Tom Goodfellow

Junior doctors – please put away your placards and turn up for work

In my last blog I stated that I had concluded that the BMA were heading to defeat on the issue of the junior doctor’s contract.

My primary reason was that as August approaches the vast majority will swallow the bitter pill and capitulate (the mortgage still has to be paid and the children fed). I think that both the BMA and the Secretary of State share the responsibility for having totally failed to reach a satisfactory conclusion.

I received only one response to this from a junior, and while I strongly sympathise with his predicament I was worried by his comment, “We are the last line of defence. No one else is fighting for the NHS”. Really? I don’t think that is the case – there are many who care deeply about the service and who are doing their best to shape a sensible and deliverable agenda (as I did for many years).

But what concerns me most about his comment it that it suggests a total blurring of the reasons behind these damaging strikes.

Obviously I am not party to all the nuances of the negotiations but my understanding is that considerable agreement had been reached on most issues. The contract contains a significant reduction in hours and many built in protections with a 13% pay increase, perversely to make up for reduced overtime payments!

The sticking points are the level of overtime pay for Saturdays (most other services work Saturdays for standard rates of pay), and the proposals for penalties on trusts who produce non-contractual rotas. If this is the case then there is, in my view, minimal grounds for continuing the industrial action.

Emotive placards stating, “tired doctors make mistakes” is a sentiment with which no one could disagree. However the evidence that the new rotas generated by the contract would be unsafe is shaky.

On February 1st Sir David Dalton, the government chief negotiator, stated that the government had reached agreement with the BMA on measures to protect juniors from unsafe hours.

Any trust which tried to implement dangerous rotas would be in deep trouble. The BMA seem to have forgotten that trust boards are legally accountable for the quality and safety of the service they provide and regulatory authorities would come down like a ton of bricks on offenders.

But this is where the blurring comes in this dispute because the ground now seems to have shifted from the nit-picking details of a contract to “saving the NHS” as my previous respondent stated. The BMA seem to have moved away from fears of “unsafe working hours” and moved on to – well I am not quite sure!

Clearly at the heart of the debate is the issue of full seven day NHS working but with the same resource. Everyone, including I suspect the SoS, knows that this is just nonsense. NHS England has refrained from publishing a report from Deloitte commissioned in 2015 into this matter, but leaks suggest that there will be an additional £900m p.a. required to make this work.

Juniors largely already work rotas which cover seven days, as do nurses, ambulance crews, radiographers and many others in the NHS. The real target of the government is consultants, and even more specifically acute medical physicians (surgeons and radiologists are already well down this road).

The definition of seven day working in the NHS is vague, but all wish to see fully staffed and adequately resourced acute services which is probably what Joe Public both understands and wants, and it would seem sensible to put time and effort into delivering this (I doubt anyone wants to attend an outpatient clinic on a Sunday afternoon).

I have lived through numerous NHS dis-organisations in my time. But the NHS is a massive behemoth and will lumber on despite the best worst efforts of the politicians, and I can find no reason for the continuing series of BMA strikes which were initially merely inconvenient but which will become more damaging and possibly dangerous.

I suspect that many of my generation of doctors will be increasingly uncomfortable with this.

I believe that the BMA were itching for a fight with the Government if only to recover their reputation following the drubbing they got from the juniors as a result of the “Modernising Medical Careers” debacle when in 2007 they sat in the High Court alongside the Department of Health against a cohort of junior doctors (Remedy UK).

They have led their troops to the top of the hill, but seem unclear as to where to go next and I suspect will have no alternative but to march them down again. Or, to change the metaphor, “when in a hole stop digging!”

Dear junior doctors, for whom I have huge respect and indeed affection, please put away your placards and turn up for work on April 6th.

Bookmark and Share

6 Responses to “Junior doctors – please put away your placards and turn up for work”

  1. bob.bury says:

    Tom – Well done on putting your head above the parapet, I hoe you’re wearing your tin helmet! However:

    ‘The contract contains a significant reduction in hours and many built in protections with a 13% pay increase, perversely to make up for reduced overtime payments!’

    Surely you don’t accept Hunt’s assertion that he is going to cover the weekends with the same number of staff, while reducing their hours and increasing their pay, all without any increase in resources? I don’t know the details of the negotiations any more than you do, but something is clearly not right here, and the government are simply refusing to negotiate in good faith.

    I’m as unhappy as anyone with IA, but I suspect there’s nothing else that will force the Tories to accept reality. I might be less inclined to think that HMG were simply lying to cover up their hidden agenda if Hunt was not still trotting out the ‘weekend effect” nonsense, and pretending that this all has something to do with the ‘7-day NHS’, whatever that means.

    We’ve both retired, but if I was still a consultant, I would be quite clear that they were coming for me next, and uneasy as I am about strike action, I think I’d als be grateful that the juniors weren’t rolling over.

  2. Ashie says:

    You’ve ignored the fact that the new contract is discriminatory to female doctors. Seeing as the future workforce in the NHS will be predominantly women, that’s a bit of a problem for me.

  3. Tom Goodfellow says:


    Of course I think that a five day work force stretched over seven is nonsense, and if you read both my blogs after cleaning your glasses you will see that I explicitly state this. But the BMA have backed away from the “unsafe working hours” due to the changes and safeguards which have been agreed.

    If any junior believes that s/he is working an unsafe rota then there are clear guidelines as to what to do.

    Ultimately they could contact the CQC, and this would be a serious worry to the Trust Board who have a legal duty to provide a safe service.


    I fully accept that this is an issue, although I understand there has been significant progress on this. However you have made my point. The BMA led the troops out of the trenches largely on the message that the contract would provide an unsafe service, and this is the message given to the public.

    However it would appear that these issues have largely been resolved. So what remains as the basis for an ongoing series of more damaging strikes? A dispute over pay for part timers? It may be a real issue; but enough for ongoing strike action? If that is the case then the ground has changed.

    The media are already turning against you, e.g. Adam Boulton, Sunday Times last week. The public will soon follow.

  4. bob.bury says:

    Tom, you misunderstand. I’m sure you do realise that it’s foolish to try and spread staff over more days and expect it to work. My poiint was that Hunt continues to insist that the contract will result in increased wages and shorter hours while delivering more input to the service. Since this is clearly impossible, it means we can’t trust anything he says on the issue.

    And I wouldn’t recommend the Sunday Times as a source of information on anything relating to the dispute.

  5. Tom Goodfellow says:

    Sunday Times – point taken!

  6. bob.bury says:

    Should have said – I think that proceeding to the all-out strike, including emergency cover, should now be put on hold, given that there are at least two judicial reviews of the legitimacy of the new contract pending.

Post a Comment

Enter this security code

Submit Comment for Moderation