Our esteemed editor recently had a bit of a rant concerning our medical representatives. At first I thought he was going to write about those delightful lads and lassies who provide us with pens and mugs while trying to get us to use their drugs or whatever. But it turned out that he was referring to the officials of our various royal colleges and their apparent reluctance to mount any meaningful opposition to the Health Bill (with the possible exception of the RCGP’s Dr Gerada).
Now Bob Bury was able to put him right concerning the proper function of royal colleges which is primarily education, standards and training (although Bob himself was just a teensy bit involved in a recent attempt to get some political lead into the RCR’s pencil).
However our editor, although not a medical man, is in the fairly unique position of being on the edge of the establishment and able to peer in. Consequently we should consider his views seriously. “Wad some power the giftie gie us to see ourselves as others see us,” R. Burns.
Joe public at large has a rather bipolar view of the profession, shaped largely by the Daily Wail and TV medical dramas. I never watch any of these with the occasional exception of Scrubs where the blend of dysfunction and surrealism seems to capture something of the reality of working in the NHS.
Dysfunction and surrealism was brought into sharp focus a decade ago when a small trust in a neighbouring town was deemed to be failing. My own trust was mandated to take it over and sort it. However the reaction of the local population was vitriolic, my trust branded as vile asset strippers whose only aim was to close their beloved hospital.
At public meetings the medical failings of the trust were clearly stated. A hospital in which over 50% of the medical staff are locums clearly has issues. But representatives of the major royal colleges were dismissed merely as mouthpieces of the doctors’ unions (sic) when they pointed out that recognition for training had been withdrawn due to major clinical deficiencies.
All to no avail! It was clear that the good folk of the town in question would prefer to have heart surgery performed on the kitchen table by a junior doctor supported by a porter and a cleaner, rather than having to travel 12 miles up the road to the specialist centre. They decided that an unconscious head injury patient with a steadily deteriorating GCS would have a better chance of survival in the small A&E department, with no CT scanner and being managed by a locum casualty doctor imported for the weekend from Germany.
It was too dangerous for heart attack patients to be moved - they were better off being treated in the middle of the night by a locum FY1. And the fact that the obstetric unit had very inadequate paediatric cover and insufficient deliveries to attract quality obstetricians and midwives was of no importance. Reason, rationality and clinical evidence are irrelevant to the public when a beloved local hospital is threatened.
That is, of course, until something goes badly wrong. In which case both the managers and the doctors end up in the deepest doodoo with cries of “how could this be allowed to happen?”
However our editor’s challenge is that “every time a big old challenge comes over the hill there’s a lack of coordination and cohesion in the response”. But like the proverbial curate’s egg he is right only in parts. I agree that the profession is bad at challenging inept political tinkering with the NHS. My generation should have stood up to Margaret Thatcher when she took away doctor’s clinical freedom and introduced Griffiths managers to run hospitals.
I did try to stand up against Tony Blair’s top-down, command-and-control, target-driven, name-blame-and-shame management style which further destroyed clinical freedom. I believe this period did more to demotivate and de-professionalise doctors than anything else, and it largely explains why most of us are semi-detached from the current issues. This is why so many doctors and college officers made only token protests about the latest health bill; we have become used to being ignored!
But we can and do rise to the challenge if given the opportunity. Ten years down the line the small trust which we took over is thriving and growing. Its patients have most of what they had before, plus many additional high-quality specialist services and facilities. All this came about because the doctors, with management and the allied professions, got stuck in and made it work.
We can and do rise to challenges - especially if they are in the direct interest of our patients. What we are not good at is fighting the system.
