Posts Tagged ‘Workforce’

New aptitude test for medical school shows bias

By Mike Broad - 22nd February 2010 10:44 am

A new aptitude test, aimed at increasing diversity and fairness in selecting school leaver applicants for medical school, still has inherent gender and socioeconomic bias, a study finds.

The UK Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) was first used in 2006 as part of the admissions process by a consortium of 23 medical and dental schools. UKCAT’s aim was to make selection to medical school fairer and more transparent. With A Level grade inflation, discriminating between large numbers of highly able applicants on their academic achievement alone has become increasingly difficult, and participation in the profession needs to be widened.

The test is an appraisal of skills such as verbal reasoning and decision analysis, and is designed to ensure that candidates have the most appropriate mental abilities, attitudes and professional behaviours to be successful in their professional careers.

To determine whether this test provides a more equitable assessment of aptitude, Professor David James and colleagues, at University of Nottingham Medical School, analysed data from the first group of applicants who sat the UKCAT in 2006 and who achieved at least three passes at A Level in their school leaving examinations.
They found a modest correlation between A Level and UKCAT scores, which confirms that the test can be used as a reasonable proxy for A Levels in the selection process.

However, the test had an inherent favourable bias to male applicants and those from a higher socioeconomic class or from independent or grammar schools.

“These findings lead us to be cautious about use of the UKCAT and the value of any one specific sub-test within an admissions policy,” conclude the authors. They also call for further research to clarify the practical value of the UKCAT in a wider range of applicants and, importantly, its predictive role in performance at medial or dental school.
In an accompanying editorial, in the BMJ, Professor David Powis, from the University of Newcastle in Australia, says that measuring cognitive ability is a step in the right direction, but it doesn’t tackle “widening participation” - the admission of people from lower socioeconomic groups or those whose education has been compromised by attending poorer schools.
And neither does UKCAT yet provide selectors with information on the non-cognitive characteristics and personal qualities that are fundamentally essential (and those that are undesirable) in the generic good doctor, he adds. This challenge remains for the future.

Read the full paper.

Read more on improving access to the profession.

Academics must protect their jobs from cuts

By Francesca Robinson - 28th January 2010 9:22 am

Medical academics are being advised to have proper job plans and regular appraisal in order to protect their jobs from funding cuts.  

“We are anticipating a very tough time ahead for many medical schools and academics because of the current economic crisis,” warned the BMA’s medical academic staff committee co-chair Professor Michael Rees.

At the beginning of January Imperial College London made 21 medical academics redundant as part of a restructuring to tackle a £28m deficit. 

Another 14 academics are currently facing redundancy at the Institute of Psychiatry at King’s College London, which has a £5m hole in its budget.

“There is certainly an increase in the generalised threat to academic employment. I can’t quantify the level of that threat but there certainly is a threat,” said Rees.

A three-pronged funding squeeze is putting a strain on medical school budgets. All university budgets will be affected by a £400m funding cut in 2010-11, announced by business, innovation and skills secretary Lord Mandelson in December. Some medical schools will also lose money because of a redistribution of funds following the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) and a review of the Multi Professional Education and Training (MPET) levy currently being conducted by the Department of Health.

The MPET review is looking to more fairly distribute funds for clinical training. The MPET levy is likely to be replaced with a tariff-based system where the funding follows the student or the trainee.

The BMA fears that this will not equate to posts following the students and could result in academic jobs being axed. Traditional medical schools, particularly those in London, which employ more staff than the newer medical schools, are likely to suffer most from any reallocation of funds.

“The threatened redundancies at the Institute of Psychiatry at King’s are particularly unfortunate because it’s a high flying department, was shown to be a very productive department in the RAE and is an important site for academic training,” said Rees.

He added that the chances of academics finding work by either moving to other universities or NHS jobs were very slim in the current economic climate.

The BMA is publishing new job planning guidance for academics, which will advise them to ensure they have a job plan which clarifies the work they do. They should undergo regular appraisals and ensure they know exactly where the funding for their joint contracts between universities and the NHS is coming from. They are also being advised to avoid any dubious fixed term contracts and to carefully check terms and conditions before accepting any job.

A spokeswoman for Imperial College said they had now agreed a new structure for their Faculty of Medicine that would safeguard their internationally leading research and education activities, and address a significant projected deficit of 28.7m by 2013/14. The deficit was caused by rising salary costs, a cut in central funding and “the difficult economic climate that universities are now operating in”.

“Staff identified as holding posts that were at risk were fully consulted during the process, and every effort was made to avoid compulsory redundancies. In total, 21 academic members of staff and 27 support staff have regretfully been made redundant,” she said.

Read a blog on the future of medical research sector.

Snowy crisis? Pah! It’s not a patch on 1947

By Katherine Teale - 10th January 2010 5:31 pm

“There’s no business like snow business”, says the sign above theatre reception. It’s certainly very bad for business, and we’ve all just about had enough now.

One or two days building igloos in the back garden may be fun, but now things are getting out of hand. The supermarket shelves are empty as panic-buyers fight over the last baguette, the streets of Hale and Wilmslow are littered with abandoned BMWs, and  local radio broadcasts lists of all the schools which  are closed even though there hasn’t been any actual snow now for two days.

“Those teachers - how much holiday do they want?” I ask my husband. I think I catch the words “Health & Safety”, but they were a bit muffled by the duvet.

Meanwhile those of us with jobs on the frontline have to struggle in to work. On Tuesday, we had the deepest snow that Manchester has seen for 30 years.

The hospital was on red alert and all elective surgery was cancelled. There goes our non-clinical cancellation target, for a start. In one day we cancelled more operations than we normally do in two months. 

There were many tales of heroic efforts to come to work - my lead ODP (a cycling fanatic) ran 13 miles to work. Gridlock was so bad that one colleague sat for four hours with nothing to do but a Sudoku (not unlike his usual neurosurgical list, he commented). One of my recovery nurses laid all her spare clothes behind the car wheels in order to get off the drive.

Altogether, we managed to keep the emergency service going and a consultant colleague volunteered to be resident overnight. Many nursing staff stayed in local hotels rather than risk the journey home - although, once they’d seen the inside of the local hotels (they have interesting plumbing, I’m told) they probably quite fancied the idea of three hours through black ice.

Needless to say, we did have some other members of staff for whom getting to work wasn’t quite such a high priority, including some who  lived within walking distance of the hospital but appeared to be snowed into their beds.   

Now that the acute emergency is over (for the moment at least) and the blitz spirit has dissipated somewhat, we are in the midst of bitter recrimination. Those who tried to come in on Tuesday but were unable to make it are outraged at the suggestion that they should be docked a day’s annual leave, whereas those who heroically came into work don’t see why their colleagues should get an extra day off. Those who just stayed in bed are keeping their heads down. 

There’s fresh disaster today - ice has prevented the bins being emptied. My elderly neighbour is outraged. “We had a worse winter in 1947 and everything carried on as normal”, he tells me. Events this week demonstrate the pathetic lack of backbone and work ethic of today’s youth, government and society in general.

Perhaps the fact that in 1947 there were only two cars on the road, everyone walked to work and kept hens in the back garden might have had something to do with it. Incidentally, hospitals only carried out three operations a week, and hadn’t just outsourced their sterilising units to Liverpool. Oh for those simple days…

“Male doctors deserve to earn more”

By Francesca Robinson - 8th December 2009 6:50 pm

Male doctors should earn more than their female colleagues because they are more productive, claims a prominent health economist.

Professor Alan Maynard of York University said on average male consultants manage 10 to 15% more patients than their female counterparts.

The figures come from an analysis of consultants’ activity rates published last year.

He jokes that women see less patients because they spend more time listening to them - unlike their male counterparts: “Thus female consultants may process fewer patients but perhaps their diagnostic skills are superior and this may produce better outcomes for patients.”

Maynard’s comments are dismissed as “completely unhelpful” by Dr Helen Goodyear, a consultant paediatrician at Heartlands Hospital in Birmingham and president of the Medical Women’s Federation.

They follow a BMA report which reveals that men, on average, earn £15,000 a year more than women in medicine.

“There is no evidence for Professor Maynard’s comments. They come from one flawed study which had a number of misconceptions in it,” said Goodyear.

Women often earn less than men because they are not as forceful in their contract negotiations, she explained. “If a woman gets paid for seven sessions she will often actually do nine or ten. If a woman is on a full-time contract of 10 programmed activities her male counterpart will often be on 13 because they are not so shy in coming forward.”

If her pay was linked to productivity, Goodyear said her salary would immediately double.

The solution is for women to take more of the top leadership posts in the profession. “Women need more encouragement and mentorship to take on these roles. We need to do away with the old boys’ network where leaders who are stepping down nominate the next leader, as still happens in quite a number of posts within medicine,” said Goodyear.

But she said there is still a long way to go: “Although more women are coming in at the bottom in medicine, it is going to take at least 20 years for them to reach the top and to change the culture.”

A BMA spokesperson said there was no justification for a pay gap in the NHS of 2009. “Women doctors undertake the same training and perform the same tasks as their male counterparts - and should also receive the same level of pay.”

Improve recognition of overseas qualifications

By Mike Broad - 7th December 2009 9:00 am

Experienced overseas doctors - from outside Europe - should have their eligibility to work in the UK considered more favourably in future following new recommendations.  

The UK Border Agency’s Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) has reported to government that some professional qualifications should be considered equivalent to a masters level qualification, which is currently required for Tier 1 immigration in the Highly Skilled Migrant Programme.

Presently, doctors with years of experience, some of whom have passed Royal College exams or been awarded a CCT to enable them to take up a substantive consultant-level post, do not meet the educational requirements within Tier 1. In a submission earlier this year, the BMA said: “In many instances success at professional examinations and in gaining a CCT will demonstrate more sustained and greater commitment than that required to gain a master’s level qualification.”

In its report, the MAC acknowledged that professional qualifications in addition to an undergraduate medical degree are now considered equivalent to master’s degrees for the points-based system of immigration, following a recent ruling by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.

Dr Shree Datta, chair of the BMA’s junior doctor committee, said: “It is pleasing that the MAC has today recognised the BMA’s concerns over recent immigration rule changes which could leave the NHS short of doctors. The government must now implement MAC’s recommendations to stop an exodus of UK-trained international doctors from the NHS.
“The BMA has taken hundreds of calls from UK-trained international doctors and medical students distressed with the prospect of having to uproot their families because of the Government’s arbitrary decision to raise the bar for educational attainment from a bachelor’s degree to a master’s degree. These doctors are vital to the future of the NHS.”

This development follows the Prime Minister’s recent announcement that there would be a reduction in the number of jobs for overseas doctors, and reduced the list of specialties on the shortage occupation list.  

There could also be a relaxation of the current rules which prevents overseas doctors, who have attended medical school in the UK, from completing their training here.

The MAC report calls on the UK Border Agency to consider the issue with “relevant stakeholders”. It says: “A situation where medical students can commence their medical training within the UK but cannot complete it does not appear to be optimal and we would not object to amended arrangements being put in place.”

Read the full report.

One in three A&E departments lack senior doctors

The Telegraph - 4th December 2009 10:59 am

One in three hospitals are relying on inexperienced doctors to look after patients in A&E, the Conservatives said.

Health regulators have highlighted concerns that patients are being put at risk in some hospitals because of a lack of senior doctors on duty in accident and emergency departments.

It was a key criticism in the Mid-Staffordshire hospital scandal and also at Basildon Hospital uncovered last week.

Using the Freedom of Information Act, the Conservatives found almost one in three hospitals did not have a senior doctor on duty including 13 per cent which only had a junior doctor present.

Hospital trusts were questioned about staffing on a range of nights.

It was found that hospitals rated poorly for patient safety by the Dr Foster report, released at the weekend, also had low staffing levels in A&E.

Of the five worst hospitals for patient safety three did not have a sufficiently senior doctor on duty or used 40 per cent or more agency staff on either night. They were Basildon and Thurrock, Scarborough and North East Yorkshire and Weston Area Health.

When asked about staffing on a weekday night, seven hospitals reported that at least half their nurses were agency or bank and three reported that at least half their doctors were agency staff.

On a weekend night, there were ten hospitals with half of the nurses on duty working for an agency, and six trusts with half of the doctors on duty being agency workers.

Read more at The Telegraph.

Sustainable future sought for the NHS by BMA’s election manifesto

By Mike Broad - 3rd December 2009 4:18 pm

With a General Election due to be called at some stage in the next few months, the BMA launched its manifesto - Standing up for doctors, Standing up for health - this week.

It offers a range of ideas and policies on healthcare that the BMA hopes will promote political debate and help shape the approach of the next government.

How to manage public services during the economic downturn will be one of the key political debates. The BMA’s manifesto urges politicians to continue supporting the NHS because of its greater role in helping people during difficult times. The next government must resist quick savings and short-term cuts in the NHS.

Dr Hamish Meldrum, chairman of BMA council, said: “Tough questions are being asked about public services. But even during a time of financial stringency, continued investment in the NHS is vital.

“A slash and burn response to the need for savings would be dangerous and short-sighted, risking long-term damage to the infrastructure of the health service. Now more than ever we should acknowledge the success of the NHS and recognise the support it gives people when times are hard.”

Standing up for doctors, Standing up for health covers three key themes: ensuring the sustainability of the NHS in the longer term, supporting the medical workforce and improving and protecting the nation’s health.

On the sustainability of the NHS, the BMA is calling for all political parties to pursue evidence-based planning of services. It believes that best value for tax payers will be delivered through reforms based on cooperation and equity that seek joined up care.

The BMA calls for an end to expensive market-based reforms, such as PFI, independent sector treatment centres, Payment by Results and the split between the purchaser and provider in England.

Meldrum said: “When the drivers are profits, it has to be asked whether patients’ interests are really being served, and value for money being achieved. Creating a market means high transactional costs and bureaucracy, with money that could be spent on patient care going to private companies and shareholders.”

On the medical workforce, the manifesto points out that high quality services can only be delivered by a well supported workforce. A full complement of trained and regulated staff is required.

Meldrum said: “It would be a disastrous error to resort to measures such as cutting clinical staff at a time when demand for healthcare is increasing.”

The BMA also calls for fair working conditions and rewards, and urges the next government to ensure that good undergraduate education and postgraduate training and continuous professional development are in place and readily accessible.  

More specifically, consultants call on politicians to rethink targets, invest in a consultant-based service and put more value on medical leadership.

SAS doctors want better access to training to promote the grade as a positive career choice. They also want swift implementation of the ‘new’ specialty doctor contract.

Juniors want the next government to review and improve training, negotiate a new contract, and recognise the value of overseas doctors.

Medical academics understandably desire the decline in the medical academic workforce to be halted. They also want more support for medical research, and for a balance to be maintained between patient confidentiality and access to data for medical research.

On improving and protecting the nation’s health, there is a long list of issues and the BMA clearly sees itself as having an important role to play in this sphere.

Alcohol, tobacco, obesity, organ donation and climate change are all highlighted as pressing issues for the next government.

There should be an increase in alcohol duty, support for minimum price levels, an end to irresponsible promotional activities, and a ban on alcohol advertising in the media.

The BMA also wants ours to be a tobacco-free society by 2035. Again it calls for increased taxation and support for minimum price levels. Smoking cessation services should be properly funded and pro-smoking footage in films should influence their classification.

On obesity, it wants a consistent approach to food and drink labelling based on ‘traffic light’, front-of-pack labelling recommended by Food Standards Authority. Legal obligations to reduce salt, sugar and fat in pre-prepared meals should be introduced and the advertising of unhealthy food stuffs should be banned.

The media should also be better used to promote healthy, aspirational lifestyle messages.

The BMA wants to facilitate a public debate on an opt-out system of organ donation.

On climate change, there should be binding and enforceable carbon footprint reduction guidelines for the NHS and the government should support initiatives to promote the health co-benefits of actions aimed to mitigate climate change, such as reducing car use and increasing levels of physical activity.

The overriding message of the BMA’s manifesto is that to develop a sustainable, high quality NHS, we all have to be more realistic about what it can deliver. There is a growing need to reconcile ever-increasing public and patient expectations about the role of the NHS, championed as a provider of universal and comprehensive care, with the reality of finite resources in an economic downturn.

The BMA calls for a ‘mature debate’ between the public, patients and health professionals about the true costs of delivering healthcare and how resources are allocated.  

Read more on the BMA’s campaign Look after our NHS.

Demand increases for medical school in 2010

By Mike Broad - 30th November 2009 9:44 am

More students than ever want to study medicine in the UK next year, figures released by UCAS, the universities admissions service, suggest.

Over 21,300 people had applied by the October deadline, with numbers being boosted by a significant increase in applications from overseas.

There’s an increasing trend - 11.6% in 2010 - of people generally applying for higher education. The increase in UK applicants to medical school was lower than this at 10.9%.

Applications from overseas, however, eclipsed these figures. There was a 35.3% increase to 2,148 applications from people in EU countries (40.8% growth among European women wanting to do medicine in the UK). And a sizable 18.4% increase from non-EU countries.

UCAS acting chief executive Virginia Isaac said: “Medicine, dentistry and veterinary medicine and science as well as places at Oxford and Cambridge are very competitive and this year is no different.

“Applicants to medicine are up 13.7 per cent with those from women, particularly from overseas and other EU countries, continuing to outstrip men.”

Meanwhile, the UK Foundation Programme Office has reported that all final year medical students are to be allocated a two year foundation programme.

They said there was a very close match between the number of eligible applications and the number of vacancies.

Consultant numbers up but so is pressure

By Mike Broad - 25th November 2009 8:20 am

Consultant expansion in medical specialties continued in 2008, according to the annual census by the Royal College of Physicians.

The workforce numbers increased across all medical specialties by 4.5%. There was a 23% expansion in consultants in acute and general medicine in one year, reflecting the increasing importance of consultant physicians on the frontline of medical admissions. 

The other specialty experiencing a large increase in consultants was stroke medicine, with an 85% increase from 27 physicians to 50. It reflects the prioritisation of stroke care in Lord Darzi’s quality agenda.

Despite the overall increase in numbers, nearly three quarters of consultants said they experienced increased work pressure in 2008 compared with three years ago. Consultants work an average of 11.6 programmed activities per week.

Consultants in paediatric cardiology work the highest average number of hours. 

Some specialties contracted, notably geriatric medicine (-1.6%), dermatology (-0.2%), and allergy (-7.7%). The latter is already a small specialty, with no specialists in either Scotland or Wales. 

The census also shows that 26.5% of consultants and 50.5% of SpRs/STs in medical specialties were women in 2008. However, only 13% of consultants worked less than whole time. Cardiology has the lowest percentage of female consultants and SpRs/STs, and palliative medicine the highest.

Dr Andrew Goddard, director of workforce at the RCP, said:The WTD has reduced the number of junior doctors available to see patients admitted to hospital. Expansion of consultants is vital to ensure that patients get high quality care early.

The census shows that this appears to be happening at the moment, but as public finances face a big squeeze over the next few years further expansion may be limited. Unless we can maintain that expansion, patient care and safety will be compromised.”

In 2008, the total number of SpRs/STs increased, but the whole-time equivalent number has not because of the rise in less than whole-time working.

The average amount of time spent by SpRs/STs training others is only 7.3%, with a wide variation between specialties.

Over 5,000 physicians responded to the survey.

Nurses call for safer staffing levels in NHS

BBC Health - 19th October 2009 11:03 am

Four out of 10 nurses say staff shortages compromise patient care at least once a week, according to the Royal College of Nurses.

An RCN manifesto to all the political parties says NHS employers must assure themselves they have safe staff levels. The RCN, whose survey covers the views of 9,000 nurses, is warning against job cuts due to possible reduced funding.

NHS trusts said managers were increasingly examining their workforces to best use the skills of their staff.

The RCN has issued its 2009 Employment Survey which shows that more than half (55%) say they are too busy to provide the level of care they would like.

Almost two thirds (67%) consider their workload is too heavy.

Read more at BBC Health.