Posts Tagged ‘Scotland’

Continued attacks on doctors will damage the NHS

By Dr Brian Keighley, chairman of the BMA in Scotland - 29th December 2011 12:31 pm

It is disappointing that over the course of the year, doctors have come under repeated attack on several fronts.

Their contracts are being devalued and undermined by NHS employers and now politicians are attacking the NHS pension scheme. It would appear that our political leaders perceive these to be the solution to the country’s national deficit. While this approach might deliver some savings in the short term, it will, in the longer term cause damage to patient care and the loss of doctors from the NHS as many may choose to retire early.

The NHS is nothing without its staff and right now with pending budget cuts, pressure on boards to make further savings, and staff cuts on hospital wards, doctors have less time to spend with patients and their goodwill is being pushed to breaking point.

Next year will see us surveying our members on the proposals for reform of the NHS pension scheme, and we have not ruled out a ballot for industrial action. Politicians should be wary of underestimating the strength of feeling amongst all members of the NHS pension scheme and listen to our concerns.

Maintaining a sustainable and high quality NHS in the current financial climate will require an open and informed dialogue about the true cost of delivering health services and the priorities for the allocation of NHS resources. Doctors working on the ground in both primary and secondary care are ideally placed to help the NHS provide the services that patients need. They are experts in delivering those services and must be engaged with both nationally and locally in making key decisions on where efficiencies can be made with the least impact to quality of care and patient safety.

Public Health

We in Scotland have always been progressive in tackling our public health challenges. Scotland led the way in tackling the blight of smoking on society by banning smoking in public places. The benefits of that legislation are clear for all to see.

Alcohol misuse is costing Scotland an estimated £3.6 billion a year. The cost of cheap drink is £900 for every adult in Scotland. If our politicians are serious about helping to change our Scots culture of heavy drinking, then they must support the government’s minimum pricing bill.

Sensible drinking begins with sensible pricing and I hope that minimum pricing will begin the cultural change we need to reduce the alcohol misuse epidemic in Scotland.

Scottish government urged to implement trainees’ charter

By Mike Broad - 20th June 2011 12:56 pm

A new charter for medical training has been launched in Scotland in a bid to raise quality and patient safety.

The charter from the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh follows its recent warning that Scotland is in danger of producing a generation of inadequately trained doctors.

The RCPE adds that training can only be improved however, if all involved parties (including the Scottish government, NHS boards and training-related organisations) recognise the fundamental problems which exist and commit to the charter’s implementation in practice.

The charter is relevant to all doctors working within the medical specialties in the hospital sector and was developed in response to an erosion in the balance between the time that medical trainees have for training and providing direct patient care, and their consultants have for overseeing this training.

Successive independent inquiry reports and multiple surveys conducted by the royal colleges had indicated that this has become a major problem within the NHS throughout Scotland and the whole of the UK, with trainees often simply and inappropriately used to plug gaps in hospital rotas at the expense of their training.

The charter is based on five guiding principles:

1. Patient safety and care is paramount;

2. All parties recognise that training and service elements must be balanced;

3. Trainees are valued for their service (patient care) contribution;

4. Trainees are actively involved in the training process; and

5. Training is fair, based on principles of equality and fosters the development of professionalism

The charter then lays out 26 detailed commitments (covering the areas of patient care and safety, recruitment and induction, balancing training with service provision, ensuring quality training, assessment and curricula, and support and development).

Key commitments include:

1. The duties, workload and work patterns of trainees should ensure patient safety;

2. Trainees and their trainers should receive protected time for clinical training;

3. Trainee numbers will be based on accurate workforce planning;

4. Trainees should receive supervision and support with their clinical case-load and work at a level appropriate to their level of competence;

5. Trainees have access to a sufficient breadth and depth of clinical work to enable them to achieve clinical competencies;

6. Processes for recruitment, selection and appointment are open, fair and effective with specific details regarding training posts available at the time of application;

7. Trainees receive equitable access to personal, ring-fenced study leave budgets to support their training needs; and

8. Trainees are supported in monitoring and accurately documenting working patterns.

The charter was developed by the RCPE’s trainees and members’ committee, which represents approximately 4,000 medical trainees, and is backed by the RCPE.

Dr Neil Dewhurst, president of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, said: “In recent years increasing pressures upon the NHS have reduced the amount of time that can be devoted to medical training. As a result, many trainee doctors are currently receiving an inadequate level and quality of training, and their consultants have insufficient time to oversee this training effectively. This has the potential to seriously undermine the future provision of high quality and safe patient care in Scotland and throughout the UK.

“Having recognised these problems, and as a major contributor to the training of doctors, the RCPE has developed a charter for medical training which we believe can lay a solid foundation for beginning to tackle the problems which exist and securing the future level of care needed by patients. However, we simply will not be able to make progress in decreasing the potential risk to patient safety and improving the quality of training if all involved do not commit to the implementation of this charter. This issue has to be considered urgently at a national level by the Scottish government and all stakeholders. Consensus then needs to be reached on how we can tackle these problems together, and a timescale agreed and resources identified for implementing the recommended measures.”

The charter has been submitted to the Scottish and UK governments and circulated widely to all of those involved in training. It represents the views and practical experiences of RCPE trainees and trainers, and builds on earlier GMC standards and other source documents.

Dr Kerri Baker, chair of the RCPE trainees and members’ committee, said: “Patients and the public, in general, may be largely unaware of the extent to which trainee doctors prop up the NHS. Trainees, often experienced doctors in their own right, are frequently the first point of contact for patients and are fully committed to providing them with the highest quality of care. But, in addition to providing direct patient care, trainees also need to be able to access training which will enable them to become fully trained and to function safely and efficiently as the consultants of the future.

“It has now reached the point where the need to plug gaps in hospital rotas, increasing work intensity - in part due to working time regulations - and the reduced availability of trainers, by the same mechanisms, are preventing trainees’ ability to receive adequate training. Almost 60% of trainees who responded to a recent survey believed they would not be adequately trained by the time of completing their training. It is, therefore, essential that trainee doctors are better supported and are provided with protected training time if we wish to secure the future safety and quality of patient care.

“The charter does not provide all of the answers, but by clarifying the roles and expectations of trainees and their trainers, and encouraging a consistent approach to trainees’ experiences nationally, we believe the charter could afford trainees greater support, strengthen their training and reassure patients.”

Read the charter.

Scotland will not follow England into competitive NHS

GP - 14th March 2011 12:16 pm

Scotland will not follow England’s lead to increase competition and privatisation in the NHS, Scottish health secretary Nicola Sturgeon has said.

Talking at the LMC conference in Glasgow, Nicola Sturgeon said increased competition in the NHS is “not the future I want for Scotland”. But she said she supported an “active role” for GPs in service planning and implementation.

Ms Sturgeon warned that the English reform plans are “damaging” and “wrong headed”. She said the plans around increasing competition pose a “real danger” and could signal “the end of the NHS as we know it”.

Read more at GP.

Payments stop but expectations continue

By Caroline Whymark - 5th December 2010 6:20 pm

It came out of the blue. Scottish health minister Nicola Sturgeon suddenly announced that in the coming year there would be no allocation of local discretionary points, or Scottish clinical leadership and excellence awards. No doctor will progress through the scheme for existing award holders.

Thus the Scottish equivalent of CEAs shuddered to a halt. Until this point, I’d felt smugly recession proof. As a consultant, I’ve not been affected by the FTSE crashing, devaluing my pension, and prolonging my working life indefinitely past the age of 60 (although I’m sure the government will do those for me in due course), nor have I suffered the waiting for said retirements to occur to free up the Consultant vacancy I sought.

No, I’ve been fine. Firmly on the flat part of the consultant salary scale, I had banked five years worth of teaching trainees, foundation doctors, medical students, recovery nurses, in fact anyone who would listen. I’ve sat on national, regional and local committees from the Blood Users Group to the Labour Ward Forum. The latter, in particular, making me feel that I really deserved at least one little point.

Yes, this was my year to apply for the coveted points and the rug has indeed been whipped from under my feet. I am disappointed, but believe I am not alone in also feeling de-motivated by this unilateral decision. It’s not often I wish to emulate the Welsh but they were definitely onto something when, right from the beginning, they refused to top slice the consultant salary pot. Rather, they chose to share it out evenly to all. A bird in the hand and all that - very wise. After all, isn’t all our frontline work in this consultant-led and consultant-delivered service worthy of recognition and reward for its excellence?

Apparently not. Even before Ms Sturgeon had re-applied her lipstick, an email from the office of our medical director (one of the highest paid consultants in the country) arrived. It stated how proud of us he was, what a great service we delivered, how he knew we understood these difficult economic times and stating his faith in us to continue going the extra mile while the proportion of our salary allocated to reward such excellence was withheld. The flurry of e-mails ‘replying to all’ almost crashed the hospital IT system. (No excellence there, clearly).

Barely had I finished digesting this message when I was distracted by the ping of another e-mail arriving in my in box. It was from the undergraduate administrator requesting someone to step in at short notice, to take the afternoon’s third year medical students’ problem based learning session. The usual clinician was unable to take the session due to unforeseen circumstances (although I suspect that ‘foreseen’ may be a more accurate term).

Who says nothing ever happens quickly in the NHS?

Distinction award scheme in Scotland halted

By Mike Broad - 17th November 2010 10:13 pm

No new distinction awards will be handed out to consultants in Scotland in next year’s round, the Scottish health secretary has announced.

In 2010/2011, the value of awards was frozen and the only new awards were those freed up by retiring consultants. In 2011/12, the value will continue to be frozen and there will be no new awards made at all, not even from those freed up by retiring consultants.

This effectively halts the scheme pending the outcome of the UK-wide review being undertaken by the Doctors and Dentists Review Body, which is due to report in summer 2011.

Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon said the move will save an £2m on top of the £2m already saved by freezing the scheme in 2010/11.

She said: “I recognise the significant cost of distinction awards and my decision to freeze the bonus scheme reflects the need to free up valuable resources that can be redirected to frontline healthcare.

“I have already made clear my view that the current system of consultant distinction awards should be reformed so that we can achieve a fairer and more cost-effective method of rewarding excellence across the NHS.”

It follows the scrapping of this year’s round of Clinical Excellence Awards in Northern Ireland despite having already been launched.

The UK government has already sought to reduce the number CEAs handed out to doctors in the 2011 round prior to the review’s findings.

In the draft guides for the 2011 round of CEAs from the Advisory Committee on Clinical Excellence Awards, the government agency that administers them, the ratio used to calculate the minimum level of investment for employer based awards has been reduced from 0.35 to 0.2 per eligible consultant.

BMA Scottish consultants committee chair Lewis Morrison said: “Consultants are stunned by the Scottish government’s U-turn. Doctors recognise that savings need to be made in the NHS, but freezing awards will be a substantial blow to the morale of overstretched consultants at a time when the health service needs more innovation and clinical leadership to maintain high-quality patient care.”

However, Sturgeon added: “It is no longer possible to justify paying significant bonuses even to highly skilled members of the NHS workforce. Bonuses across other areas of the public sector have already been cut and NHS consultants are not exempt from the need for budgetary restraint.”

Scottish Labour health spokeswoman, Jackie Baillie, welcomed the additional savings, but said more needed to be done.

“I have been saying for months now that the Scottish Government does not need to wait for the UK to act on distinction awards and I welcome today’s U-turn from the health secretary,” she said.

Read more on the value of CEAs.

“Generation of unemployed doctors in Scotland”

Healthcare Republic - 12th November 2010 12:35 pm

BMA Scotland has warned the country may be left with large numbers of unemployed doctors unless medical student places are cut.

The level of specialty training intake between 2011 and 2015 means 5% of medical graduates are expected not to secure a foundation training place in Scotland, BMA Scotland warned.

The concerns were raised in a manifesto outlining what the BMA believes the political parties’ priorities for health should be ahead of the Scottish Parliament elections in 2011.

The manifesto says 21% of those on the foundation programme will not progress further in Scotland.

Read more at Healthcare Republic.

Thousands of NHS posts could go in Scotland

BBC Health - 3rd June 2010 11:09 am

The NHS in Scotland is forecasting it could lose the equivalent of 3,790 full time staff over the next year.

The figure includes 1,523 nursing and midwifery posts and 1,053 administration service jobs. The workforce projections have been published following pressure from opposition parties at Holyrood.

Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon said there would be no compulsory redundancies and the figures “were not set in stone”.

Read more at BBC Health.

“Trusts must support consultants’ SPAs”

By Mike Broad - 25th March 2010 1:02 pm

Consultants must demonstrate effective use of their Supporting Professional Activities to ensure employers support them.

This is the message of a BMA report on SPAs, which reminds employers that under the consultant contract a consultant should in most cases undertake 7.5 direct clinical care programmed activities and 2.5 SPAs.

It also calls on NHS managers must invest in their consultants to enable them to improve their skills, develop research and new techniques, build their services and contribute to innovation. This is particularly important during a period of financial constraint, the BMA says.

The report includes examples of achievements made by consultants across Scotland, which have only been possible because of SPA time and demonstrates the importance of non-clinical time to promoting quality in NHS services.

Tayside consultant, Dr Stephen Curran, used his SPA time to set up a community-based eating disorder service for his health board; Mr Alastair Murray, orthopaedic surgeon at the Royal Hospital for Sick Children in Edinburgh, was able to create a new service for treating clubfoot in South East Scotland; and, Dr Graham Tydeman, O&G consultant in Fife, designed and implemented one of the first fully integrated video archive, telemetry and electronic reporting and audit packages in fetal medicine, which is now used in over 30 units in the UK.

Dr Charles Saunders, chairman of the BMA’s Scottish Consultants Committee, said: “The Scottish Government is shortly to publish a Quality Strategy for the NHS in Scotland and the role of consultants as clinical leaders is central to this agenda. NHS managers must not be short sighted and recognise that SPA time is an essential part of a consultant’s role. SPA time is also essential to enable consultants to keep up to date with their skills as well as to develop and innovate services.

“Consultants want to improve services for patients. It’s largely down to their persistence, dogged determination and leadership that these services have developed to the benefit of their patients.”

Read more on SPAs.

Merit awards defended against speculation

By Francesca Robinson - 29th October 2009 1:50 am

A sustained attack on consultants’ distinction awards in Scotland has been dismissed as ill informed by doctors’ leaders.

Doctors’ representatives in England say they have no fears that the government would attempt to abolish the Clinical Excellence Awards, negotiated as part of consultants’ remuneration.

In Scotland, Dr Ian Mckee a Scottish National Party MSP and a former GP, has called for reform of the Scottish system of distinction awards for senior doctors. 

He has questioned the need for the Scottish SNP Government to set aside £30 million for next year’s awards. “If consultants are getting the equivalent of a junior government minister’s salary on top of their own salary this latest round of awards does look bit off,” he said.

He has called for the awards to be frozen in the short term. Other politicians have called for the system to be scrapped.

Stephen Campion, chief executive of the Hospital Consultants and Specialists Association, said: “It is a very real worry that ill informed speculation and comment will be made on anything that could remotely be seen to be a bonus because that is the political and economic climate that we are currently working in. 

“But the important thing to understand is that CEAs are not a bonus. A bonus is based on profit share while the CEAs are paid to recognise the work such as teaching and research that consultants do which is of added value and benefit to the NHS.”

For 2009/10, a level one CEA was worth £2,957 while the highest level 12 (or platinum) award was £75,796.

Paul Flynn, deputy chairman of the BMA’s consultants committee, said: “At the moment both ourselves and the Department of Health through the Advisory Committee on Clinical Excellence Awards recognise that CEAs reward excellence among consultants.

“The scheme is part and parcel of consultants’ remuneration and if the government wanted to change that we would expect them to open negotiations with us. I don’t believe the system in England is under threat.”

A Scottish government spokesman said that in evidence to the pay review body this year they had recommended a pay freeze for consultants and no uplift to the amount payable as individual distinction awards.

A spokesman for the BMA in Scotland said: “Scotland needs to retain the distinction awards system in order to encourage innovation and to prevent consultants from leaving to work south of the border where they can traditionally earn more.”

Read more on Clinical Excellence Awards.