Posts Tagged ‘Public health’

Poorest people in England live seven years less

BBC Health - 11th February 2010 11:45 am

People in England’s poorest areas live an average of seven years less than those in the richest ones, says a major report on health inequalities.

Epidemiologist Sir Michael Marmot, says the NHS must spend much more on preventing illness. And he calls for an increase in the minimum wage to allow everyone to have a healthy lifestyle.

The health secretary, Andy Burnham, has welcomed the government-commissioned report and said more work was needed.

The Marmot Review shows that although life expectancy has risen in poor and rich areas, inequalities persist.

People in the poorest neighbourhoods will also spend a greater proportion of those shorter lives unwell.

The report estimates up to 202,000 early deaths could be avoided, if everyone in the population enjoyed the same health as university graduates.

Doing nothing to tackle these inequalities would cost the economy more, according to the review, which says inequality in illness accounts for £33bn of lost productivity every year.

Read more at BBC Health.

A (salt) mine of information during awareness week

By Sarah Burnett-Moore - 11:12 am

It’s National Salt Awareness Week. I’m already quite aware of salt, it tastes great, and it even looks pretty, particularly those fancy hand harvested varieties. I cook with it, and I add it to food. I don’t have high blood pressure or a family history of heart disease, so can anyone convince me that this is bad for me?

In the interest of research I had a look at the ironically named ‘CASH’ website, Consensus Action on Salt and Health. Someone has gone to a lot of effort to come up with that acronym, shame they didn’t go to the same effort to proofread the web copy. It’s riddled with spelling mistakes, atrocious grammar, and sentences that go: “The supermarkets and the food industry claim that no-one ever told them they want foods with less salt and unless consumers demand it, they don’t see a need to change.”

How reassuring that this is the language of peers and professors. You may think I’m being overly picky here, but I don’t think this online amateurism is going to win any hearts or minds. I would offer to rewrite it for them, but there is no ‘Contact Us’ information.

But back to the science, salt is going to give me high blood pressure, left ventricular hypertrophy, stomach cancer, proteinuria, osteoporosis, asthma, fluid retention and obesity. I’ve looked at the ‘evidence’ on the website, which is largely postulates and propositions. The evidence is poorly referenced, the references are mostly written by the 22 expert scientific members who comprise the committee. There are confounding variables all over the place, does salt make me fat? Or is it the chips I am liberally sprinkling it on?

But how much salt is too much? The recommended level is between three to six grammes, which is a teaspoonful. As I don’t eat any prepackaged or processed food, I can safely say that my level is well within allowed limits, despite my culinary penchant. I might be packing an extra couple of kilos, but I have the bone density of an elephant, and the blood pressure of a 20 year old. So far I seem to be getting away with it. 

The French cook with significant amounts of salt, yet their incidence of many of the above diseases is far lower than ours. It’s not because they use Fleur de Sel either, because as the CASH website points out: rock salt isn’t “any different from common salt just because it’s mor (sic) expensive.” Imagine how many Michelin stars Alain Ducasse would have if he stopped using salt.

So for the time being I am not going to worry, especially after one of the tabloids carried a headline this week saying that there wasn’t enough salt…It seems such a waste to spread it on the roads, but it does make for gourmet snow.

For public health wishlist, read bunch of arse

By Jerry Nelson - 8th February 2010 10:13 am

One of the best things about this new Information Superhighway thingy is that you learn new things every day with just a few clicks of the mouse. During my idle moments, like in clinic, say, when some patient is droning on about all their tedious problems, I surf away and pick up all sorts of little gems. For example, I have recently learnt all about something called ‘Fisting’.

What you do, is take something that someone else has written that’s a whole load of arse, and challenge it line by line. (Er…shouldn’t that be ‘Fisking’? Ed).

Anyway, I thought I’d give it a go and I had to look no further than the pinko leftist ban-everything site called Hospitably Doctored and its succinct coverage on the latest pronouncements of the Royal Society for Public Health Fascists With Nothing Better To Do.

Here goes:

“The Royal Society of Public Health and UK Faculty of Public Health want the political parties to adopt a 12-step wish list to boost the nation’s health.”

Whether the ‘nation’ wants it or not. Note: political PARTIES plural, in case in our childish ignorance we try to vote against any of this arse gravy.

“Jointly representing about 9,000 public health professionals.” 

Is it me or does that mean there are far too many of them?

“…their manifesto calls for: 1. A minimum price of 50p per unit of alcohol sold. Alcohol consumption in the UK has doubled over the last 40 years.”

Doubled!! Oh, no that sounds terrible, that means it’s as high as - save us, o wise Public Health Professionals - the level it was in 1900! You know, when the town centres were awash with vomiting Victorian Chavs beating up policemen, and everyone died of liver failure?

“Alcohol is now 69% more affordable than in 1980.”

What a load of arse. Check the Office of National Statistics. “Between 1980 and 2008, the price of alcohol increased by 283.3%. After considering inflation (at 21.3%), alcohol prices increased by 19.3% over the period”. Can you think of anything else that’s gone up by 20% in real terms, apart from the number of portentous authoritarian announcements from public health professionals? 

“Tackling price and availability are the most effective alcohol policies.”

So, if we ‘tackle availability’ all the way to zero, the problem would disappear, as in prohibition-era America, when nobody drank. And there was no crime!

“No junk food advertising in pre-watershed television. The Ofcom measures, in 2006, to ban junk food advertising between programmes where 20% of the audience were younger than 16 have been ineffectual. A complete ban is needed to effectively reduce consumption of salt, saturated fats and sugars by children and adolescents, reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease later in life.”

So if a partial ban had no effect, why would you assume a complete ban would do anything, other than make you feel butch and important?

“25% increase in the number of cycle lanes and cycle storage facilities.”

Don’t get me started. Looks like they didn’t read this. Oh, and this is a cycle storage facility and they’re everywhere.

“Introduce presumed consent for organ donation.” Your kidneys now belong to the state. So they will take them out and give them to someone so cack-handed and useless they could only get a job in transplant surgery.

“Free school meals for all children under 16. Evidence shows that cardiovascular diseases can originate in childhood, and it is important to start good dietary habits early.”

‘Good dietary habits’? BWAHAHAHAHA. Yeah, that’s why we all still eat school meals as adults! School meals is a byword for ghastly inedible 14p-per-head state-delivered swill. Also dangerous in combination with previous item. 

God helps us all. I shall leave the last word to Professor Henry Brubaker of the Institute of Studies: ”Once again [doctors are] talking about ‘public’ health as if that’s an actual thing. There is ‘my’ health, which is ‘mine’, and ‘your’ health which is ‘yours’, but there is no ‘our’ health. D’you see?”

Quite.

Twelve step plan for boosting the public’s health

By Mike Broad - 21st January 2010 5:29 pm

The Royal Society of Public Health and UK Faculty of Public Health want the political parties to adopt a 12-step wish list to boost the nation’s health.

They claim practical steps need to be taken to tackle serious public health concerns such as obesity, heart disease, alcohol abuse and sexually transmitted infections.

Jointly representing about 9,000 public health professionals, their manifesto calls for:

1. A minimum price of 50p per unit of alcohol sold

Alcohol consumption in the UK has doubled over the last 40 years. The average consumption of alcohol in a population is directly linked to the amount of harm. Consumption is strongly linked to affordability: as price has fallen, consumption has risen. Alcohol is now 69%more affordable than in 1980. Tackling price and availability are the most effective alcohol policies.

2. No junk food advertising in pre-watershed television

The Ofcom measures, in 2006, to ban junk food advertising between programmes where 20% of the audience were younger than 16 have been ineffectual. A complete ban is needed to effectively reduce consumption of salt, saturated fats and sugars by children and adolescents, reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease later in life.

3. Stop smoking in multi-occupancy cars

Evidence shows that a car can be 23 times more toxic than a home environment for passive smoking.

4. Chlamydia screening for university and college freshers

STIs are rising, up by 150% between 1997 and 2007, particularly amongst young people. A concerted drive to encourage universities to offer screening to students and highlight its health impact, would raise awareness the importance of sexual health with this age group.

5. 20mph speed limit in built up areas

A 20mph speed limit in built up areas would have manifold benefits. It would reduce pedestrian and cycle accidents; encourage people to walk and cycle more because it would be safer; and discourage people from using polluting cars because of the ‘frustration’ of having to drive slowly.

6. A school nurse for every secondary school within 10 years

School nurses play a vital role in child and adolescent health. They can also help identify at-risk teenagers.

7. 25% increase in the number of cycle lanes and cycle storage facilities

Making roads safer for people to cycle on will help reduce cardiovascular disease and decrease carbon emissions as more people use bikes instead of cars on short and medium distance journeys. The economic benefits of walking and cycling routes show a cost benefit ratio of 20:1 with likely savings including a reduction in deaths due to heart disease and stroke. Planning controls should include stipulations to build appropriate cycle storage facilities spearheaded by supermarkets and hospitals.

8. Compulsory and standardised front-of-pack labelling for all pre-packaged food

A clear at-a-glance labelling system, including a traffic-light‚ indication of the level of fats, saturated fats, sugars and salt, would help consumers choose healthier options, and should be made compulsory.

9. Olympic legacy to include a commitment to expand and upgrade school sports facilities and playing fields

Increasing physical activities in schools is vital to fighting childhood obesity. Evidence suggests that pupils who are more active are also more attentive in class and have greater concentration.

10. Introduce presumed consent for organ donation

The need for donor organs is more pressing than ever and surgeons are increasingly using higher risk‚ donors with less healthy organs. One thousand people per year die waiting for an organ donation. We need the urgent introduction of a presumed consent scheme, allowing people to opt out if they choose to do so.

11. Free school meals for all children under 16

Evidence shows that cardiovascular diseases can originate in childhood, and it is important to start good dietary habits early. It is estimated that by 2020 one in five boys and one in three girls will be obese. A free school meal scheme has been successful for over 30 years in both Sweden and Finland, and ensures that pupils receive at least one nutritious meal everyday, regardless of their home circumstances. This would do much to reduce health inequalities in terms of childhood obesity.

12. Stop the use of transfats

It has been proven that transfats (industrially produced transfatty acids) can damage health. As with cigarettes there is no known safe level of consumption. Banning transfats from foods is a relatively easy way to help protect the public.

Professor Richard Parish, chief executive of the Royal Society for Public Health, said: “We are facing unprecedented challenges to public health ranging from climate change to a catastrophic diet and accidents to alcohol abuse. The time to act is now, not to wait until it is too late to do anything meaningful.

“Many of the actions needed require political will, rather than resources. This manifesto represents a start upon which the next government can build a healthier and more prosperous future.”

Both the government and the Conservatives said that public health was a priority, but declined to commit themselves to the policies.