Posts Tagged ‘Private practice’

The Revenue offers tax-avoiding consultants an amnesty

By Mike Broad - 12th January 2010 8:00 pm

The economic downturn is having far reaching consequences for hospital doctors.

Not only is it threatening the funding of their services, and their pay rises, for years to come, it has also prompted an inquisition into their financial affairs.

In these lean times, Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) are under pressure to collect as much of our taxes as possible. With the country’s mountainous debt, every penny is needed.

You might have thought that when tracking down those professionals who have underpaid tax, it would have initially focused its energies on those who helped to create the economic crisis. Bankers and city speculators would have been top of my list.

But the HMRC has taken a different approach. For some undisclosed reason, doctors are at the top of their list.  

It’s offering a three-week ‘amnesty’ - called a Tax Health Plan - for doctors who may have underpaid tax in the past to rectify the situation.

Doctors who make a voluntary disclosure will be asked to pay the full tax they owe and a penalty of up to 10% - and the Revenue has made it very clear these will be the best terms offered.

From April 2010, the HMRC will investigate doctors they believe have not declared their full income, dating back up to 20 years.

The Revenue is playing its cards close to its chest. As well as not explaining why its targeting doctors first, HMRC is also coy on the number of doctors involved in tax fraud (unofficial figures suggest 800) and the amount it wants to recover.

It briefly consulted with FIPO, BMA, HCSA and the GMC at the end of last year so one can surmise it is particularly interested in consultants with significant private practices.

Mike Wells, HMRC’s director of risk and intelligence, explained: “Our aim is to make it as easy as possible for people to come forward, make a full disclosure and benefit from the certainty of a reduced 10% penalty that HMRC is making available to those who qualify for this opportunity.

“From April we will be using the information at our disposal to investigate medical professionals who have not declared their full income. I therefore strongly urge any in this group who think they may have outstanding tax liabilities on their income to get in touch with HMRC and get their tax affairs in order simply and on the best available terms.

“This is the first step in enabling those with undisclosed income or gains to avoid a full tax investigation together with much higher penalties. The message is clear: contact us before we contact you.”

There’s no doubt the HMRC is adopting a tough approach. If a doctor has undeclared revenue, and ignores the Tax Health Plan, they could face an additional penalty ranging from 20% up to 100% of the tax due, and face an investigation that could result in criminal prosecution. It would question a doctor’s probity and be reported to the GMC.

If the doctor in question has evaded over £25,000 of tax, they will be ‘named and shamed’ with their details being published on the HMRC website and distributed on a press release to the media.

While not wishing to excuse any doctors who have avoided paying their tax and broken the law, the way HMRC is going about collecting unpaid taxes rom professionals raises some questions.

Consultants have from now until 31 March 2010 to register their intention to make a voluntary disclosure with HMRC. By 30 June, those who have registered must have made their disclosure as well as arrangements to pay all tax interest and penalties due.

That deadline doesn’t take into consideration the potential complexity of their financial arrangements, particularly if they’re contested. The HMRC will not give them any further time, which is unlikely to instil confidence in the process.

Furthermore, there is little information available for private practitioners working in group and partnership arrangements. Is one partner liable for the tax fiddling of another, for example?

It’s unacceptable that the Treasury loses an estimated £3bn a year in tax evasion, but is the HMRC offering enough of a carrot for tax evading doctors to come clean and save itself the time and effort of an investigation?

Some accountants and legal experts suggested the campaign will provide ‘easy pickings’ for the Treasury. Unlike bankers and lawyers, doctors don’t have the same level of expertise to call on in hiding any undeclared revenue.  

The line from representative organisations, such as the BMA and HCSA, is consistent and clear: doctors who have concerns should consult their financial advisers to ensure their tax affairs are in order.

Stephen Campion, chief executive of the HCSA, said: “We are grateful that at least HMRC consulted with us to alert us in advance but the HCSA is not associated with, or party to, this campaign.

“However we do advise all hospital consultants and senior doctors to be aware of the HMRC campaign and take professional financial advice if at all concerned about tax liability and accuracy of self-assessment.”

To make a disclosure ring HMRC on 0845 600 4508, or use the e-form available via the HMRC website.

Cosmetic surgery engulfed by “perfect storm”

By Mike Broad - 16th November 2009 9:58 am

There should be a Europe-wide ban on the advertising of all cosmetic surgical procedures, the president of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery has demanded.

Mr Nigel Mercer, consultant plastic surgeon, says mounting public expectation, media hype and professional greed are creating a “perfect storm” around the cosmetic surgery market and measures need to be taken now to prevent it.

He says: “It is paramount that every person, organisation and regulator involved in the cosmetic surgery industry strenuously protects the patient. If we do not do that there will be a backlash, just as there has been in the banking industry.

“This is not protectionism but common sense. The world needs bankers more than cosmetic surgeons.”

He believes many doctors involved in cosmetic surgery are putting their own financial interests a head of the duty to protect their patients. Mercer, writing in the journal Clinical Risk, and who is also the president of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, says: “We are now seeing a generation of surgeons who want to train purely to perform cosmetic surgery, rather than being attracted to performing reconstructive surgery.”

He continues: “If we have to sell anything, we should sell our advice, not procedures. If we cannot self-regulate, then, like the financial institutions, regulation will eventually be imposed.”

Mercer criticises aggressive marketing techniques, such as two-for-one offers and surgical holidays.

He says: “In no other area of medicine is there such an unregulated mess. What is worse is that national governments would not allow it to happen in other areas of medicine. Imagine a ‘two-for-one’ advert for general surgery?”

The media is complicit giving “the public the impression that cosmetic surgery procedures are quick fixes and carry no risk of downtime or complications. Nothing could be further from the truth and it defies common sense to think otherwise.”

Clinical effectiveness, or lack of it, is a problem and he warns that the industry should not sell procedures directly to patients. He cites the example ‘dermal filler’.

“In the US, there are only a handful of fillers with FDA approval, whereas in the UK there are over 100 on the market. Why the difference?

“In the US, the products undergo testing as a ‘drug’, but in the UK they are tested as a ‘device’ and so only have to pass ‘CE’ mark requirements, which relate to standards of production, not of efficacy. Drug testing is lengthy and expensive but CE marking is not. That is why substances can be injected, which are perfectly legal, but do not need to be licensed for efficacy or safety.”

Europe should adopt FDA-like testing for implantable devices, and seek to control the advertising of products, even online.

He calls for all providers of care involved must be subject to regular inspection and revalidation. And for the development of an insurance product which would cover the patient for complications.

Mercer concludes by calling for cosmetic surgeons to behave responsibly, with integrity and probity.

Plans to enable waiting NHS patients to go private

BBC Health - 10th November 2009 9:06 am

Hospital patients in England may get the right to be seen privately if the NHS cannot treat them quickly enough.

Hospitals have to start treating patients within 18 weeks of referral - or two weeks in the case of cancer.

But ministers now want to give patients a legal right to private care - or treatment at another NHS centre if so desired - if this does not happen.

The Tories, who would scrap waiting time targets, said it was an “unaffordable and uncosted” pledge.

Some patients - in fact several thousand a month - are already being treated at private hospitals under the NHS through the patient choice initiative.

At the start of the referral process, they are able to choose from an approved list of providers that are willing to carry out the treatment at NHS cost.

But this latest initiative, which will be announced by health secretary Andy Burnham this week, will allow patients to opt to switch to private care at a later date if it turns out the NHS cannot see them within the deadline.

Read more at BBC Health.

Think carefully before calling in the fraud squad

By Stephen Campion, HCSA chief executive - 27th October 2009 6:36 pm

“Does your wife, or anyone else, drive your car doctor?” was, I thought, a strange question to be asked of a consultant by a clinical director.

But apparently someone - motive as yet unclear - thought his job plan meant he should have been somewhere else other than the local private hospital. So, rather than the trust first simply checking his diary and the job plan, officers of the NHS Fraud Squad instead spent months trying to get pictures of his car parked at the aforementioned private hospital.

They only succeeded in getting four pictures. Goodness knows how much time they spent hiding in the rosebushes waiting to take pictures of the car that “did not attend”.  

What a waste of money! That it was parked there was never going to be a contested issue. Just how much is being paid by way of covert surveillance, and how far are we from becoming a ‘stitch up’ society?  

Few would argue that fraud, when uncovered, means the perpetuator should be bought to account. But I would also like to think that we are living in a fair society and that the NHS should only revert to secret-service style tactics after very careful thought.

This is by no means the first occasion that I have encountered consultants being subject to such scrutiny and they might never find out if they have, if the fraud squad decides that there is insufficient evidence to proceed.

I was involved in one case where the NHS Fraud Squad involved the Crown Prosecution Service who determined there was no basis to proceed; but the trust went ahead anyway because the lesser burden of proof was in its favour. More often than not these Fraud Squad activities take place with the ‘suspect’ completely unaware of what is going on.

My point is that if the employer suspects infringement of the rules, is it right to go straight to the world of hidden cameras and enforcement officers hiding in the hedgerows at vast public expense? Or would it be better if a quiet word was first spoken in the ear?

Clearly much will depend on the severity of what is being investigated; and whether the source of the information is credible as opposed to malicious - and there are far too many of those. But I just worry that the fraud squad is becoming a weapon of first rather than last resort. Either way it saddens me that spy cameras seem as much part of the NHS, as speed cameras are to local authority revenue streams. 

Is your private practice secretary self-employed?

By Rose Landinez - 26th October 2009 11:18 pm

Many consultants use their NHS secretaries to assist with their private practice administration. All too often the secretary is treated as being self-employed, with their fees paid on receipt of a monthly invoice.

Were HMRC to look into the arrangements, they would almost certainly insist that the secretary was fulfilling the role of an employee rather than a self-employed worker. It does not matter that you may pay varying amounts month by month based on hours worked or letters typed, or that the secretary “works for three other consultants so must be self-employed”, the fact is that the consultant is providing work on a regular basis and the arrangement bears most of the important badges of employment.

HMRC have several tests to weed out the employed from the self-employed, such as the requirement to receive sick or holiday pay, the right to provide a substitute worker, etc. It is not a question of simply ticking off boxes - if you have a steady arrangement with someone who works for just a few people, the position risks being classed as employment.

From a tax point of view, both consultant and secretary would much prefer to be dealing with a self-employed arrangement. The consultant would be spared the hassle of running a payroll and would not need to account for employers National Insurance Contributions, while the secretary would pay a lower rate of NIC and would be claiming for expenses that are not available to employees.

Unfortunately, what we would like and the correct way to proceed are often quite removed. Anyone continuing with such an arrangement is taking a risk. The worst case scenario would be for HMRC to insist the secretary should have been treated as an employee, and the gross amount paid by the consultant is viewed as a net salary, with the consultant being held liable for the tax and NIC that should have been deducted.

If you are caught in this sort of situation, you need to look at setting up a payroll or to give up on your secretary and use the services of an agency or a secretary who is clearly self-employed. The final option is to continue on current lines and to keep looking over your shoulder - you have been warned.

Rose Landinez runs Medic Tax. To contact her email rl@medictax.co.uk

Setting up in private practice - guidance for consultants

By Mike Broad - 1st October 2009 2:55 pm

Many consultants consider private practice to generate more income. The current size of the UK private healthcare market is about £4bn with 7.5 million insured patients (13% of the population). About 19% of the market is self-pay.

Minimum requirements to set up in private practice include a registerable medical degree, FRCA or equivalent, a certificate of completion of training or equivalent, and entry in the appropriate specialist register of the GMC.

Any doctor doing private practice will be required to pay a higher medical indemnity subscription, have more complicated accounts and must make sure that their private work does not conflict with their NHS contract.

Before starting in private practice, the consultant should get advice from a chartered accountant about their tax situation and from a colleague who is an experienced independent practitioner.

Admitting rights in private practice

Before a doctor can work in a private hospital, admitting rights or practising privileges need to be obtained. All private hospitals have a Medical Advisory Committee (MAC) that comprises consultants of all subspecialties, one of whom will be the chairman. The senior manager of the hospital should grant practising privileges to consultants who meet the standards set by the MAC. Practising privileges are not awarded by right; some hospitals may refuse to award them even to consultants who meet the criteria. The private hospital will provide a consultant with the necessary application forms on request.

Consultants must adhere to the appropriate clinical governance requirements as determined by the private hospitals and agreed by the MAC of these hospitals.

Registration with a private medical insurer

Before a private medical insurer (PMI) will pay a consultant directly for treating their customers, consultants need to register with them. This may involve providing copies of documents that will satisfy the PMI that the consultant is suitably qualified to provide medical care to their customers.

The larger PMIs include: Axa PPP Healthcare, BUPA, BCWA, Aviva and WPA.

Accountants for private practice

An accountant with experience in private practice will provide invaluable advice on billing, banking, taxation and expenses. They will also be helpful when planning pensions and eventual retirement from both NHS and private practice. The fee that an accountant charges for work done that relates to private medical practice is a tax-deductible expense.

Billing in private practice

The keeping of accurate records is the key to efficient billing. You should keep a record of the following for every patient you treat: name, address, telephone numbers, date of birth, insurance details (PMI, registration number, authorisation number), date of procedure or treatment, the hospital at which the procedure was performed, other consultants involved, procedures performed (both narrative and OPCS codes) and any unusual occurrences or circumstances.

A logbook or database that contains this information will obviously contain confidential information. Electronic records come under the terms of the Data Protection Act, and appropriate registration and data protection are required. A secure backup of all data should be kept. Many consultants starting in private practice choose to do their own billing and to keep their own accounts. The consultant should keep precise and careful records of the date and amount billed, and the date and amount received. Commercial software packages are available that will facilitate this process. However, as private practice volumes in increase, many opt to pay others to do their billing and financial record-keeping. Consultants whose partners have no income or whose earnings are less than the threshold for higher-rate income tax may benefit financially from paying their partners to do the billing.

Setting of fees in private practice

There is a difference between benefits and fees. Benefits are what insurance companies pay out on behalf of patients according to the terms of their policy contract with them. Fees are what consultants charge patients for their professional services.

These two terms should not be confused. Most PMIs make their benefit schedules available to consultants. Some, such as the WPA, make their schedule publicly available.

It is for the individual consultants to determine their own fees. Agreeing with a group of local consultants to charge the same fee as other group members can be considered anti-competitive and should be avoided unless the group is trading as a partnership with an established legal identity.

Factors that influence private practice fees

Individual consultants are free to set fees according to a variety of factors they feel are pertinent. These might include:

1. The time taken to provide the service, including pre-operative, intraoperative and postoperative care.

2. The training, qualifications and experience necessary to provide medical care safely. 

3. The complexity of the medical care provided. 

4. The rarity of the skills necessary to provide safe and effective care.

5. The risk to the patient of the procedures being performed.

6. The time of day and day of the week that the service is provided and the degree of urgency. 

7. The risk to the consultant of providing the service. 

Consultants should review their fees on an annual basis. Read for more information.

Banking in private practice

Take advice from your accountant on how to manage your bank accounts. Most consultants who conduct private practice maintain a separate bank account that is wholly dedicated to their private practice. A consultant setting up in private practice should keep a full and accurate record of all payments into this account and all payments made from it.

Tax issues

Never forget that tax has to be paid on the money that the consultant has earned through private practice, so take advice from an accountant. Many consultants ring-fence 40% of their private practice income in a separate account so that they always have the money available to pay the tax.

Every year some doctors are investigated by the Inland Revenue. Most are chosen at random, some because they have drawn attention to themselves through poor or suspicious accounting. A tax investigation is time-consuming and costly for the individual concerned. It is possible to take out an annual insurance policy to cover the costs of an investigation.

Indemnity in private practice

A consultant undertaking contracted NHS work in a private hospital would normally be covered by the NHS Litigation Authority. NHS indemnity does not cover the defence of staff involved in disciplinary proceedings conducted by statutory bodies like the GMC, police investigations arising from professional practice or Good Samaritan acts.

It is essential for consultants – especially those undertaking private practice – to be a member of a medical defence organisation or have some other form of appropriate insurance cover. This indemnity will cover clinical negligence claims, complaints procedures, Good Samaritan acts, advice on legal and ethical dilemmas arising from professional practice, GMC enquiries, disciplinary procedures, inquests and fatal accident enquiries, and police investigations arising from professional practice. Absence of protection can lead to professional and financial ruin.

These subscriptions are allowable expenses against private practice earnings. Policies with commercial companies are on a ‘claims made’ basis. This means that the insured doctor is only covered for claims arising from incidents which both occur and are reported whilst the policy is in force. When the policy expires, so does the cover unless a run-off payment is made. The mutual organisations offer ‘occurrence or incident-based’ schemes that give protection for claims arising from incidents that occurred during the subscription period no matter when they are reported, even if it is many years after that subscription had ceased. These provide ongoing protection at retirement or death – the latter prevents one’s estate being liable for claims.

More information at the MDU and MPS.

Medicolegal work

Medicolegal work can be divided into personal injury and negligence. The former entails examining clients who are making claims for injuries that they have sustained outside the medical arena, often occupational in nature.

The latter – clinical negligence – involves assessing the care of patients. The consultant has to derive a likely sequence of events from a bundle of documents, largely clinical records; explain those events in terms that an intelligent layman can understand and decide whether the standard of care would be regarded as acceptable by a reasonable body of peers. They produce a report and may have to appear in the witness box.

The advantages are that much of the work can be done from home and its reasonably rewarded. However, deadlines are tight and reports are often challenged and there are risks if you step outside your field of expertise. For more advice visit the Academy of Experts and the Expert Witness Institute

Legals of private practice

Professional liability insurance for clinical practice does not necessarily provide cover for medicolegal work. Consultants can fall foul of doctors who might have been unfairly castigated in a report, of patients who feel that the consultant has not been sufficiently supportive of their claim, or of lawyers who are dissatisfied with the service the consultant provided. Cheap medicolegal insurance is available from all the major defence organisations.

Avoiding a clash with NHS work

Consultants should not undertake procedures or care for which they are not appropriately trained, experienced and in ongoing practice. NHS consultants should have similar clinical portfolios in both sectors.

There will be times at which the demands of these two practices will seem to clash. The consultant contract specifies that private practice should not normally be conducted in contracted NHS hours or when on-call for NHS patients. If an existing private patient unexpectedly develops a complication that requires urgent treatment, it can be acceptable to leave NHS duties or to delay them provided adequate cover is given for those NHS patients under your care.

Chambers and group practice

Most consultants start out in private practice as sole practitioners. Some will find that an established group practice already exists. It is particularly attractive within specialties like anaesthesia, radiology and pathology with discrete episodes of direct patient responsibility.

The advantages include sharing costs and expenses, practice accommodation and administrative support and strength in negotiating with private hospitals. This has to traded off against loss of professional autonomy and the tax advantages of paying a partner for secretarial work.

Consultants can work together through chambers or partnerships. Most chambers offer a system whereby the members contribute to these common expenses by paying a percentage of their gross income. However, there is no profit-sharing as in a partnership and individual members of the group keep the fees they earn beyond what they have to pay towards the chambers expenses.

A partnership is a type of business entity in which partners share the profits or losses of the business undertaking in which they have all invested. The shares may be equal (equity partnership) or may be fractional, based upon the seniority or some other factor that varies only by the consent of all partners. A true partnership must have a legally drafted partnership agreement signed by all partners and there should be regular partnership meetings.

Generally, partners have an obligation of strict liability to third parties injured by the partnership. The liability of limited partners is limited to their investment in the partnership, hence the term Limited Liability Partnership.

Without a legally drafted partnership agreement, the group will not benefit from the legal advantages of a real partnership, such as the ability for all partners to charge the same fee without an accusation of price fixing.

Partnership administration can be largely left to the salaried partnership manager who acts under the immediate direction of the elected partnership chairperson.

More information can be gathered from the representative organisations FIPO and IDF.

Related stories:

How to employ your spouse in your private practice.

Latest developments in private practice. 

 

Revalidation challenges for independent sector

By Geoffrey Glazer, chairman of FIPO - 29th September 2009 5:41 pm

All doctors know that revalidation is coming down the line. Recertification will be necessary for specialists and GPs and every doctor who wishes to remain on the specialist register will need to report to a responsible officer, who will be the link to the GMC and revalidation.

At the moment the first draft on RO functions is out for consultation and will be laid before parliament in early 2010. ROs must be in position by October 2010 with revalidation beginning in 2011.

This raises a large number of issues for all doctors, the first being which RO they must report to. Currently, the documentation suggests that NHS consultants will report via their trusts where it is envisaged that, in the main, the medical director will take on this role. Independent consultants with practising privileges at a private hospital will report to the hospital where they do most work. Thus all independent sector hospitals (or groups) will need to appoint an RO.

The RO will only be able to accept suitable appraisals which are now to be strengthened and will include multi-source feedback. The appraisal system has yet to be formalised and the Academy of Royal Colleges has outlined its view; there is clearly a move towards specialty driven appraisals. All independent sector consultants will need to go through an accredited appraisal system.

The Federation of Independent Practitioner Organisations (FIPO) working in conjunction with other groups such as the London Consultants’ Association will reinforce the appraisal systems that already exist for consultants in the independent sector.

The work for the RO will be massive as there will have to be cross liaison between all hospitals where the consultant has an affiliation. The majority of consultants in the independent sector have an NHS appointment and they will have to take forward to their NHS RO all the details of their work in any private arena; this is “whole practice appraisal” writ large.

So the independent sector will need to produce more precise clinical data and reports on incidents/complaints but as a consultant may work in more than one independent hospital the network could be complex and costly.

There are also questions over data availability, conflicts of interest, fairness, standardisation of appraisals, funding and what constitutes an “incident” plus a general fear that unfounded allegations may end up on a doctor’s file. These are yet to receive satisfactory answers.  

Many of these issues will be explored at a forthcoming conference, Consultant Revalidation in the Independent Sector, on 24 November in London. It’s CPD recognised, and full details are available here.

Employing your spouse in your private practice

By John O'Leary - 14th July 2009 7:24 am

The logic behind employing your spouse in your private practice is often sound - if you look at a couple as a whole, you are likely to pay less tax if you can spread the income between you both so as to utilise two sets of personal allowances and basic rate tax bands.

If you are a high earning couple, for example married consultants both on 40% or 50% tax rates, there is little to be gained from going down this route, but for others it can be a useful planning tool.

If a spouse or civil partner is employed in the business, care must to be taken. It is important that their services can be justified (i.e. are they worth what they are paid). You cannot simply create a role on paper for your spouse and then pay a salary.

In practise, however, it is rare for the spouse of a consultant not to help out to some degree - they may well perform receptionist/secretarial duties, help with banking matters, do a spot of bookkeeping etc. Such services should be rewarded with a reasonable wage.

Another issue concerns payment arrangements. Far too often a spouse will perform a vital role in the practice, be paid a reasonable wage via the PAYE scheme, but because the payments have not been handled correctly the consultant will be denied the expected tax relief.

It is vital that the wages of a spouse are paid by standing order into an account in your spouse’s name. Should your payments be made into a joint account or be made in cash, HMRC have the power to treat the payments as not having been made and can deny you the appropriate tax relief.

If the payments are less than the personal allowance (currently £6,475), there is no need to set up a PAYE scheme as long as your spouse does not have another job. Should their salary be greater than the allowance or if it is possible to obtain NIC credits for the spouse, you will need to register with HMRC and go through all of the PAYE hoops regarding tax, National Insurance, end of year returns etc. In practice many consultants simply get their accountants or a payroll bureau to relieve them of the hassle.

It is not uncommon for the services of a spouse or partner to command a salary in excess of the tax and national insurance thresholds. When this happens, the downside is often that national insurance (paid both by the employee and the employer) leaves the couple worse off than if they had paid a low salary.

There are ways around such issues, for example through the creation of a partnership (there is a lot of misunderstanding about partnerships – many accountants will say that husband and wife partnerships will be attacked by HMRC, whereas if things are handled properly you should have no problems).

For the majority of consultants, utilising their spouse in the practice is a practical way to save tax – but make sure that you do not get caught out by the small print.

John O’Leary is head of medical taxation at Sheen Stickland LLP. Contact him on joleary@sheen-stickland.co.uk or 01420 83700.

How to become a medical expert witness

By Mike Broad - 1st June 2009 10:54 am

An expert witness is qualified by their knowledge and experience to give an independent opinion on a specific issue in court.

Role of a medical expert witness

The medical expert offers an opinion on the facts of the case. This can be based on written notes and documents, or through an examination of the patient. The medical expert is not the treating doctor.

While their opinion is provided at the request of one or other of the parties involved in the claim, the duty of the medical expert witness is to assist the court rather than the party who instructs them.

The medical expert’s report or comments must be independent, objective and unbiased. The doctor’s expertise helps the court decide the matter before it, and may be used to diminish the other side’s case. It can lead to appearing as a witness in court and having the opinion tested by cross examination.

The role can vary from considering a breach of duty in a clinical negligence claim, offering opinions on liability and causation, to examining a claimant and discussing their treatment and what could be offered.

A medical expert witness should not be confused with a professional witness. The former provides an expert medical opinion on a case, whereas the latter is requested to testify solely on the observed facts of a case.

Who can be an expert witness?

Doctors put themselves forward as experts. Mail-shots can be sent to local law firms. It is also possible to advertise on the internet and/or in the legal press.

However, the most common way doctors promote their expertise is through registering with organisations that maintain expert witness databases. There are a number of them and they have varying degrees of rigour in determining eligibility for entry. None are endorsed by medical institutions:

Society of Expert Witnesses

Academy of Experts

Expert Witness Institute

UK Register of Expert Witnesses

The Expert Witness  

Expert Witness

The Council for the Registration of Forensic Practitioners

How much does a medical expert witness get paid?

It varies. Research suggests that they range from £50 per hour up to £200 per hour. Fees are however under pressure.

Skills required of a medical expert witness

The most obvious is a sound knowledge and practical experience of the subject matter in dispute. Additional skills needed include an ability to communicate findings and opinions clearly, concisely and in terms adapted to the court or tribunal. Doctors are advised to seek training on report writing and courtroom presentation skills.

Understanding the responsibilities of being an expert witness

Doctors are advised to understand the duties of the role before putting themselves forward. A good understanding can be developed by attending a relevant, CPD-approved course. They should also consider organising a proper induction into expert witness work, particularly in those specialties frequently called on to assist the court. 

The GMC’s guidance Good Medical Practice, which sets out the principles which underpin good care, includes information relevant to doctors working as expert witnesses.

Paragraph 51 states: “You must be honest and trustworthy when writing reports, completing or signing forms, or providing evidence in litigation or other formal inquiries. This means that you must take reasonable steps to verify any statement before you sign a document. You must not write or sign documents which are false or misleading because they omit relevant information. If you have agreed to prepare a report, complete or sign a document or provide evidence, you must do so without unreasonable delay.”

To meet these principles, medical expert witnesses should ensure that their statements, reports and verbal evidence are: straightforward, rather than intentionally misleading or biased; as objective as possible and not omitting material or information which does not support the opinion expressed or conclusions reached; and properly and fully researched.

Appointment process to being a medical expert witness

It is the court’s responsibility to decide whether a doctor is an ‘expert’. The court should examine the following issues in establishing the credibility of the medical expert: is the expert’s area of practice and expertise relevant? When did they last saw a relevant case in their practice? Is their view is widely held? Have they been trained as a medical expert? Are they up-to-date on CPD and in good standing with their royal college? Doctors should only put themselves forward if they are comfortable with the answers.

Questions to consider when taking a case as an expert witness?

1. What type of case is it?

2. On whose behalf are you being instructed?

3. What are the timescales involved, and how much time will be involved?

4. Has the fee scale been agreed?

5. Are you an expert in this area? Can you provide references that support your evidence?

6. What are the implications for you if the court does not accept your evidence?

Professional conduct issues

There are salutary lessons for all medical expert witnesses from the case of Professor Sir Roy Meadow. These particularly concern the provision of poor or misleading evidence, or evidence drawn from outside one’s expertise.  

Paediatrician Sir Roy came to prominence for his research into Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy and his crusade against parents who harm their children.

He appeared as an expert witness for the prosecution in several child murder trials. Meadows was struck off by the GMC in 2005 after he was found to have offered “erroneous” and “misleading” evidence in the Sally Clark case. Clark was a lawyer wrongly convicted in 1999 of the murder of her two baby sons. At her trial, Sir Roy said the odds of two children from such an affluent family dying of natural causes were one in 73 million. His claim was later disputed by the Royal Statistical Society. Clark’s conviction was quashed in 2003.

Meadow appealed to the High Court, which ruled in his favour in 2006 by a majority decision. The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision in part, ruling that Meadow’s misconduct was not sufficiently serious to merit the punishment he received.

The Court of Appeal did, however, over turn the High Court’s finding that expert witnesses should ordinarily be immune from regulatory bodies disciplinary hearings. Expert witnesses continue to be immune from civil litigation in respect of the evidence they give.

In 2004, the Deputy Chief Justice was scathing about Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy in setting out the reasons for Angela Cannings’ appeal – another mother wrongfully convicted of murdering her child. It led to the overturning of a number of convictions. The law was changed so that no person can be convicted on the basis of expert testimony alone.

Messages for medical expert witnesses

1. Recognise the overriding duty to the court and to the administration of justice. 

2. Give opinion and evidence within the limits of professional competence. 

3. Keep up to date with your specialist area of practice.

4. Explain, where appropriate, that there are a range of views on a particular issue. 

5. Take appropriate action if your opinion changes

More information

BMA guidance

Crown Prosecution Service  

Code of practice and directory in Scotland

Criminal procedure and court rules in Scotland

EuroExpert

Bond Solon

The Law Society of England & Wales

Academy of Medical Royal Colleges