Posts Tagged ‘Prevention’

Cultural shift required to meet children’s needs

By Mike Broad - 20th September 2010 8:48 am

A huge cultural shift is required across health services to meet the needs of children and young people and take the service from its current “mediocre state”, a major review concludes.

The review, called Getting it right for children and young people, calls for children’s health services to be as high a priority as adult services.

Professor Sir Ian Kennedy, who led the review, found that although there are some excellent services from which others might learn, a large number are in need of significant improvement. Standards of care across the country were shown to vary, with some health services lacking co-ordination and struggling to communicate effectively across the complex array of organisations, units and teams.

The data collection, necessary for effective management of services, is described as poor or non-existent in many areas of healthcare for children and young people. The findings also call for a review of how young patients are progressed from children’s to adult care.

Currently, under what Professor Kennedy describes as “a phenomenon created by the system”, young patients are arbitrarily moved from children’s services to adults services because they turn 16 or 18, regardless of their needs.

Health secretary Andrew Lansley welcomed the review and published an engagement document, Achieving Equity and Excellence for Children. It sets out what the recent white paper will mean for children, and explores how children’s services can be improved in future.

The review recommends focus be given to getting policy right, for GPs to be given additional paediatric training and for investment to be shifted towards children and young people’s health services.

Other key recommendations of the review include creating a single point of responsibility for children’s health and wellbeing, linked in to other public services used by children, with an identified funding stream for their health and healthcare.

And the review calls for a focus on prevention, early intervention and wider well-being instead of the current model of treating illness and injury.

It also suggests that a responsibility for policy relating to children’s healthcare and wider well-being be brought together.

Kennedy said: “In assessing how the NHS meets the needs of children and young people, I have found many barriers. They were created, and operate, at a staggering number of levels, from Whitehall right down to patients. These myriad systems can make life impossible for the children, young people and their families who desperately need the services that the NHS exists to provide.

“We must shift investment towards children and young people and the staff who work tirelessly to help them. This has to happen now, and be there from the moment a child is conceived.”

The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health welcomed the report. A spokesperson commented: “This is a crucial document for the future health of children and is particularly important given that the recent white paper has little to say about children.

“We support Kennedy’s emphasis on the joining up of children’s services. We also strongly support his emphasis on early intervention, as it helps to ensure the best outcomes for children and is a crucial investment for their wellbeing in later life. This requires making sure that any health professional, particularly in primary care, who sees a child has the skills to best support their needs. The college is fully committed to working with other professions to overcome the cultural barriers recognised by the Kennedy report.”

Lansley responded: “In our new vision for the NHS, and in preparing for our public health white paper later this year, we are determined to provide for children and young people as an essential and integral part of delivering better health outcomes.”

After 13 years of Labour, do we have a high performing NHS?

By Mike Broad - 13th April 2010 11:14 am

Opposition parties are painting a picture of an NHS with major deficiencies. The Labour government, however, believes that the NHS is ‘good’ but needs further transformation to become ‘great’.

The King’s Fund released a review this week, called A High Performing NHS, which assesses how far the investment and accompanying reforms since 1997 have transformed the NHS in England. The following is a summary of its findings:

1. Access

Since 1997, there have been major and sustained reductions in waiting times for most hospital treatments. Now most patients are seen, given tests and treated within 18 weeks of referral by their GP. More progress is needed in some specialties and services which are not included in the targets. Sustaining short waiting times might prove challenging as funds tighten in the future.

There have also been improvements in the number and variety of primary care services, and most people can access GP services within the target of 48 hours. Progress is needed in access to out-of-hours care. The government has identified public demand for some kinds of hospital care to be delivered closer to home, but progress in shifting care out of hospital settings has been slow.

2. Patient safety

Ongoing increases in the number of reported safety incidents reflect improved reporting and coding, but under-reporting continues to be a major obstacle, particularly in primary care, and will have to be addressed in the future.

There have also been considerable efforts made to learn from adverse events and disseminate that learning to the NHS front line. But it is clear that there is some way to go on creating a fully open culture of reporting within NHS organisations.

3. Health promotion

There has been significant progress in tackling smoking. It is too soon to see the benefits of the most radical legislative action - the 2007 ban on smoking in public places - but the effects are likely to accelerate falls in smoking rates and associated ill health.

This review has found that progress has been more elusive in reducing harm from alcohol and rates of obesity. Consumption of alcohol has increased since 1998, accompanied by a rise in alcohol-related hospital admissions and rates of liver disease, suggesting more aggressive, cross-departmental action will be needed in the future. The prevalence of obesity is rising in adults and children, despite government targets to halt the increase.

4. Clinically effective

This review considered the progress made in relation to the three major health conditions which account for the most NHS spending: cancer, cardiovascular disease and mental ill health. Mortality from cancer and cardiovascular disease has fallen substantially since 1997 and suicides have also reduced.

Even though mortality and survival rates for several cancers have been improving they still lag behind those of other European countries and effort will need to be sustained in the areas already identified as needing further work, for example, early diagnosis and access to radiotherapy.

There have been notable improvements in access to cardiac surgery and recommended standards of stroke care, and these have contributed to falling mortality for cardiovascular disease. However, variations in quality persist.

In mental health services, access to specialist early intervention and crisis resolution teams for acute illness has improved and is judged to be one of the best systems in Europe. This has led to reductions in acute admissions, but long-term reductions in symptoms and improvements in the quality of life of service users have been more difficult to achieve.

5. Patient experience

Overall public satisfaction with the way the NHS is run has been increasing steadily for the past few years.

Understanding how patients experience the NHS has been transformed through the creation of one of Europe’s largest patient experience surveys. Most patients report being treated with dignity and respect but progress still needs to be made in relation to choice, involving patients with their care and some aspects of the hospital environment.

6. Equity

From 1997 there was a clear shift in government policy towards reducing inequalities in health outcomes, and goals were put in place to reflect this ambition. Infant mortality has reduced and life expectancy has improved for all social groups in England; however, progress has been faster among less deprived groups. Targets to reduce gaps in infant mortality and life expectancy between the most deprived areas and the national average have not been met.

Questions remain about the extent to which reducing inequalities has received adequate investment and commitment from the NHS.

New legal requirements on the NHS to ensure equitable access for all patients regardless of age, gender, disability, ethnicity, religion and sexual orientation, as well as deprivation, represent a big challenge in the future.

7. Efficiency

NHS productivity overall has declined over the last decade despite the introduction of stronger incentives through new hospital payment systems and quasi-market reforms in part designed to bear down on production costs.

Higher pay costs have absorbed more than half of the increase in the financial resources that became available to the NHS since 2002. On the other hand, substantial savings have been made in the cost of medicines and other goods and services used.

There is substantial scope for further savings through more efficient delivery of hospital and other services, such as reducing lengths of stay in hospitals, increasing the rate of day case surgery, and using lower-cost drugs.

8. Accountability

Since 1997, accountability of NHS trusts to the government has been strengthened, particularly through the use of targets and strong direct performance management.

NHS trusts are also accountable to local commissioners, but it is clear that PCTs are still at a fairly early stage of development in their capacity to use commissioning as a lever, in part due to several years of reorganisation.

There have been significant developments in creating more locally accountable services, for example, through the creation of foundation trusts with members and elected governors. The impact of these changes has so far been limited.

One of the government’s most striking contributions in this area has been to set up independent regulators of health care organisations to inspect and assure the quality of services.

Professional regulation has also been overhauled, with the aim of making the professions more responsive to public rather than professional interests, but many of the changes are still very recent.

There has also been effort to make the system more accountable to individuals, notably through the NHS constitution.

Summary

In summary, the King’s Fund says the NHS is closer to being a high-performing health system now than it was in 1997. It is capable of delivering high-quality care to some patients, in some areas, some of the time.

But, it claims work remains to be done to fill in the gaps: unwarranted variations in access, utilisation and quality of care even where national guidelines exist; ensuring that patients’ experiences have a real impact on the quality of care locally; and, above all, ensuring there is adequate investment and energy in tackling the preventable causes of ill health and better support and care for those living with chronic conditions.

Read the full report.

Will NHS leaders tackle our sick leave culture?

By Stephen Campion, HCSA chief executive - 20th August 2009 11:36 am

When is the NHS not the NHS? It seems to me that the answer is: whenever it suits the politicians.

I am not sure there is anything remotely ‘national’ about the NHS these days. Of course the health service is publicly funded and has some common frameworks and standards but the service has rapidly fragmented.

That in itself is not necessarily a bad thing; I have always been a firm advocate of the centre letting go. But my rule of thumb guide is that the NHS is national when boasting its achievements - but very much local when things go wrong.

It is amazing how the NHS can be both the largest employer in Europe when politicians point to success but an individual, self-managed hospital trust is rapidly distanced from mainstream NHS at times of failure. ‘Hands on’ when the news is good; ‘Hands off’ when politicians want to be disassociated with the bad. 

So, is the news that 45,000-odd staff employed within the NHS are absent daily from work a ‘hands on’ or ‘hands off’ issue? Well, it is certainly uncomfortable news, although comes as no surprise.

At last Dr Boorman has the courage to bring it into the open. But I am not convinced that counselling, gym facilities and occupational health will restore NHS staff to rude health. If prevention really is better than cure surely the real issue is how illness should be avoided in the first place rather than dealing with it when it strikes. Why are doctors at such high risk of self-harm or worse? Why are managers driven to achieving targets through bullying their staff? How long can sustained and often unreasonable pressure be applied to NHS employees whose health needs are secondary to the overriding requirement to satisfy the political imperative?

These are issues of culture within a health service driven by ‘hands on’ imperatives. That same influence must now be galvanised into recognising that the health and welfare of all NHS staff is crucial.

At last Dr Boorman has put his finger on it. His report concludes that there must be a complete NHS culture change to make workforce health the responsibility of every single member of staff. He is right in his assessment. Will those with ‘hands on’ responsibility act? Or will this report and further research become ‘hands off’?

Talking of hands I only hope that the health and welfare of NHS staff does not become a two fingered exercise! It is far too important for that.