Posts Tagged ‘Polyclinics’

Darzi polysystem plans for London to be halted

Healthcare Republic - 21st May 2010 9:04 am

New health secretary Andrew Lansley has confirmed he is to “call a halt” to NHS London’s controversial reconfiguration of services.

NHS London planned to close a third of London’s hospital beds, move 55% of hospital work into ‘polysystems’ and close 13 district hospitals because of its £5bn funding shortfall.

The plans were criticised for assuming that a network of polysystems and polyclinics could replace many local hospitals and GP practices - an idea suggested by ex-health minister Lord Ara Darzi in his 2006 review of services in the capital.

But Mr Lansley said he wishes to put local clinicians in charge of any service changes that are required.

Read more at Healthcare Republic.

Justification for polyclinics shot down by figures

By Mike Broad - 5th March 2010 4:02 pm

Lord Darzi’s plans to reconfigure A&E services, shifting huge numbers of patients to polyclinics and urgent care centres across the country are based upon inaccurate estimates of patient usage, a report reveals.

Many trusts are exploring how they can deal with more patients into primary care inorder to avoid financial crisis.

In London, one of the key assertions of the strategic planning guidance issued to PCTs in the capital last year is for “60% of A&E activity to shift to polysystems”. Up to 12 A&E departments across the capital face possible downgrading to urgent care centres, with more patients being directed towards polyclinics.

However, a Department of Health-commissioned report released today shows that no more than 30% of patients attending A&E departments could be classified as needing only primary care. It may be a little as 10%.

These proportions are much lower than the levels assumed by managers and health chiefs. It followed Lord Darzi’s suggestion, in 2007, that 50% of less serious A&E cases could be dealt with by polyclinics.

The report, by the Primary Care Foundation, investigates the use of GPs and primary care professionals in A&E. It finds that the increasing number of GPs and primary care nurses working in A&E can improve the quality of patient care. However, it found little evidence for claims that this approach drives down costs or avoids inappropriate hospital admissions.

Dr David Carson, joint director of the Primary Care Foundation, said: “Patients know who their GP is and where the nearest emergency department is. So, it’s vital to get the service right.”

Dr John Lister, information director of campaign group London Health Emergency, said: “This new report shoots plans for A&E closures and hospital rationalisation in London, and in many other cities, out of the trees.

“It is clear that diverting the least serious A&E cases away from hospital A&E departments would affect less than half the number of cases that managers had assumed - and that little or no money would be saved.

“This document means that every plan to scale back A&E services to “Urgent Care Centres” or polyclinic level needs to be torn up and revised. NHS London needs to go back to the drawing board.”

Read the full report.

London hospitals facing crisis, report says

By Mike Broad - 20th January 2010 4:57 pm

Hospital services in London could close or be down graded as healthcare in the capital heads towards ‘a major financial and organisational crisis’, a report claims.

The BMA-commissioned report, London’s NHS on the brink, predicts real term cuts of £5bn by 2017 in the capital.

London faces unique challenges, the report claims. It has 14.8% of the English population but could suffer a much higher share of the expected cutbacks.

There are more mental health patients per head of population in London than other regions, the capital has rising patient activity and it has more PFI hospital schemes. The repayments for London’s 20 PFI hospital projects will have a lifetime cost of around £16.7bn - more than six times the basic cost of the buildings.

The report highlights proposals NHS London has made public, including reducing the number of people visiting A&E by 60% and hospital outpatients by 55%. Polyclinics, as proposed by Lord Darzi, will fill the gap.

The hospital network will be slimmed down, with the reduction of many district general hospitals to smaller hospitals, leaving a lower number of major acute hospitals. The report also highlights plans to reduce staffing in non-acute services by two thirds, shorten GP appointments and cut payment by results tariffs.

The study also criticises NHS London’s refusal to release a confidential report drawn up by management consultants McKinsey’s on the way a head.

Some reports have however indicated that London PCTs will face a funding gap in the region of £5bn by 2017. The health budget for London in 2009/2010 was £13 billion.

Dr Kevin O’Kane, chairman of the BMA’s London Regional Council, said: “We are calling for full disclosure of the proposals so that there can be a public debate. This is vital so that Londoners can have their say about local cuts and take a wider view of what is happening to the NHS.

“The truth is that most Londoners have no idea of what is happening to their health service. If people realised that we are heading towards financial meltdown involving cuts in bed numbers and hospitals closing or being down-graded, they would demand the opportunity to make their voices heard about these plans.”

A spokesman for NHS London said change was being driven by population growth and health inflation, with the downturn making it more urgent.

He said: “Healthcare for London will deliver an even better quality NHS for less money. Patients told us they wanted a more convenient and accessible health service. This meant localising services where possible and centralising where necessary.

“We already have the first of more than a hundred polyclinics open longer hours than traditional GP surgeries, providing care normally only available in hospital. We are also creating new world class specialist centres for stroke and major trauma which will save 500 lives a year. No change will lead to the death of the NHS in London by a thousand cuts.”

Read the full report.

Darzi Review and NHS modernisation: at-a-glance guide

By Mike Broad - 17th July 2009 5:01 pm

The government’s plans to reform the NHS over the next 10 years were laid out in the Darzi Review.

In 2007, colorectal surgeon Lord Ara Darzi was asked to conduct the review on health services in England and consulted with strategic health authorities and clinical pathway working groups to set future priorities.  

Darzi suggested that while the NHS was two thirds of the way through its modernisation programme - as set out in the NHS Plan in 2000 - further steps were needed. While the health service had increased capacity and driven down waiting times, quality and outcomes needed to be improved.

Other aims of the Darzi review included ensuring services were better joined up, care was more accessible and integrated, and services provided more patient control, choice and local accountability. There’s also been a drive to put clinical decision making at the centre of the reforms.

As the Darzi review took shape it echoed the themes of the white paper Our Health, Our Care, Our Say - particularly on choice, personalisation and community services - but there was a change in how it would be delivered. It was no longer about top down targets with a focus on outputs, but about quality and local determinism.

The key devices to achieving this are improved information on clinical performance, greater choice and control for patients and strengthened incentives for providers.

High Quality Care For All

The final report High Quality Care For All - NHS Next State Review Final Report was published in June 2008. It sets out how the NHS should move from centrally driven, target based management to one of empowered local services focused on quality as well as activity.

Darzi’s focus on raising quality

One of the key drivers of change will be a range of local quality indicators that will enable clinicians to benchmark and improve their performance. Areas measured will include mortality, complication and survival rates and patients’ views. 

Financially, funding formulas and contract payments will increasingly be linked to quality outcomes. All providers - NHS, private and third sector - will be required from April 2010 to publish Quality Accounts explaining how they made a difference.

Clinical Excellence Awards will be more focused on quality improvement. New awards conditional on clinical activity and quality indicators, and encourage clinical leadership and innovation.

Patient rights

The review proposed the new NHS Constitution, which spells out its principles and values and enshrines patient rights.

Patients will have a greater choice of GP practice, and ‘choice’ is a tenet of the constitution.

Patients are now guaranteed access to the most clinically and cost effective drugs and treatments. All patients will receive drugs and treatments approved by NICE where the clinician recommends them. NICE’s appraisals process is to be speeded up. Some have criticised it for being toothless.

In his first major speech as health secretary Andy Burnham outlined the developing system of accountability in the NHS, initiated by Darzi, and founded on a smaller number of agreed patient outcomes and fundamental rights. The NHS Constitution will sit alongside service guarantees linked to a minimum set of standards - rather than lots of volumetric targets - that will need to be maintained.  

Services closer to home  

Darzi had just produced his 10-year plan for the reorganisation of the NHS in London when he started his review. The London plan proposed the creation of larger specialist centres for the treatment of conditions such as stroke and heart attacks. This was combined with a network of 150 GP-led health centres providing a combination of services traditionally offered by GPs and district general hospitals.

Many of these ideas were also reflected in the interim report Our NHS Our future: NHS Next Stage Review

published in Oct 2007. This report included recommendations to introduce MRSA screening for hospital admissions and create 100 new GP practices in deprived areas.

It also controversially proposed to create 150 new health centres around the country which would provide extended range of services and longer opening hours. Polyclinics are intended to improve access and better integrate primary care practitioners with diagnostic and specialist services.

They are intended to reflect local needs and priorities, and be open from 8am to 8pm every day to fit with people’s lifestyles. Any member of the public can walk into a polyclinic regardless of which local GP service they are registered with, and people will be offered the opportunity to register at these new facilities.

However there are concerns that, despite a lack of clarity over their purpose, they are being rolled without being piloted.

And that polyclinics will compromise the coordination of care, prompt staff shortages and end up primarily nurse-led.

It’s looking increasingly likely that polyclinics will only be established in London.  

Personalised services in Darzi review

When consulting for the review, Darzi commented: “Patients have told me that they still sometimes feel like a number rather than a person…they lack ‘clout’ inside our health care system.”

Along with clarifying and strengthening patients rights, and giving them more choice over who treats them, the review also gives them more power over how they are treated.

Everyone with a long-term condition will have a personalised care plan and personalised health budgets will piloted, with direct payments used where possible.

Andy Burnham described personal budgets in his first major speech as the “ultimate expression of power and influence being handed down to the individual patient”. The DoH is due to pilot them among 5,000 patients with chronic conditions. “These pilots will give patients the power of the purse strings: making decisions with the help and guidance of GPs or consultants that directly affect their own budget is spent.”

A more preventative approach to public health

The NHS, through partnership working, will focus on improving health alongside treatment. Every PCT will commission comprehensive wellbeing and prevention services in partnership with local authorities. And there’s a new coalition for Better Health with voluntary agreements between the Government, private sector and charities to improve health. GP’s Quality and Outcomes Framework is to be improved to provide incentives for maintaining health as well as providing care. 

Better guidance and regulation

The Care Quality Commission will have new enforcement powers to improve safety and reduce healthcare associated infection.

NICE will be expanded to set and approve more independent quality standards. A New National Quality Board will set priorities and feedback to government.

Promoting innovation

There is new emphasis on innovation and fostering an enterprise culture. Strategic health authorities will be under a statutory duty to promote innovation and regional innovation funds will be launched to invest on a commercial basis in good ideas. There will be a pilot programme of ‘health innovation and education clusters’ to stimulate partnership working between clinicians, universities and business.

Empowering staff

More support is promised in the Darzi review for clinicians who want to move out of the NHS to set up independent social enterprises. Their pensions will be protected. Integrated care organisations will also be piloted, bringing together health and social care professionals together. There is also a pledge to reinvigorate practice-based commissioning and give greater freedoms and support to high-performing GP practices to develop new services for patients.

Clinical leadership will strengthened, with medical directors and quality boards featuring at regional and national level.

Darzi review update – one year on

Darzi launched a new set of proposals in High Quality Care For All: Our Journey So Far, which charts the progress of the Darzi Review one year on.

Clinical budget ownership is to be extended to hospital doctors and nurses, with the aim of promoting entrepreneurship and innovation in service delivery.

Two “obsolete” clinical targets are also to be removed: the 13-week outpatient and 26-week inpatient performance targets. A review into other targets was also launched.

A voluntary peer review accreditation system will also be introduced to assess the standards of clinical teams and create competition among clinicians to improve. The royal colleges are currently developing a consistent approach, and it will be overseen by the National Quality Board.

Darzi’s resignation

Lord Darzi resigned, in July 2009, returning to research and surgery. While the public reason for his early departure was his concern for his patients, it’s been suggested he found the culture of Whitehall challenging.