Posts Tagged ‘Personal budgets’

Real personal budget pilots launched

Pulse - 30th June 2010 12:25 pm

Patients will be given cash to purchase their own NHS care for the first time under a new government scheme.

The direct payments pilot, announced by health minister Paul Burstow, is to be rolled out across eight PCTs, who will directly hand patients the money for their care, allowing them to decide how, where and from whom they receive treatment.

Real personal budgets are already available to patients to purchase some forms of social care, but until now, personal health budgets have only been obtainable via PCTs or third parties.

The pilot scheme, which will run until 2012, is being developed to help patients with long term conditions such as diabetes, stroke, heart disease, end of life care and mental health conditions.

But the BMA has expressed concerns over the potential for the funding to be used to pay for ‘inappropriate and/or non-evidence based services or treatments’, including complementary therapies such as homeopathy.

Read more at Pulse.

Personal budgets “bureaucratic and iniquitous”

By Mike Broad - 25th January 2010 11:22 am

Plans to allow patients to hold personal budgets, that can be used to buy the NHS services they want, have been heavily criticised by the BMA.

In response to the government’s consultation on personal health budgets, the BMA said they will create a new layer of bureaucracy for PCTs and divert funds into unproven treatments.

Personal budgets have been widely introduced into social care in recent years and the government is keen to extend them into health.

They’re intended to create a more personalised NHS by giving people more control over their care. They involve giving money to individuals to allow them to buy their own health care in line with an agreed care plan. Patients who are intended to benefit include those with long-term conditions.

In social care, personal budgets have proved popular among service users with physical or learning disabilities, but have not been embraced by older people.

The BMA is also concerned that giving some patients the ability to make direct payments for their care could undermine equality, even though the money is from the tax payer. The system could come to favour those that hold budgets over those that don’t.

Other concerns include personal budget holders being exploited by third parties; how to ration care if patients spend their whole budgets; ‘banking’ of funds against a rainy day rather than spending what they need on care now; and, further reinforcement of healthcare as a commodity.

Dr Hamish Meldrum, chairman of council at the BMA, said: “We believe in choice and flexibility for patients but these plans are worrying for a range of reasons. Apart from the practical difficulties and added bureaucracy involved, direct payments would take us even further towards a model where healthcare is a commodity to be bought and sold rather than something to which people are entitled.

“These proposals potentially undermine the principle of equal access on which the NHS is based.”

PCTs are currently involved in 70 pilots that have been running since October 2009. The government wants to evaluate the pilots and introduce a refined personal budget model from summer 2010.

Stephen Campion, chief executive of the HCSA, said: “In the current economic climate there should be a moratorium on initiatives such as this. The reality is that the NHS is struggling just to stand still. Do patients really want to be further worried about managing their finances and purchasing options in addition to having their health and social care needs met? I am not so sure.”

Experts slam plans for patients to buy homeopathy

Pulse - 26th November 2009 2:26 pm

Government plans for patients to have the freedom to buy homeopathy on the NHS as part of its personal budgets scheme have come under fire.

The plans include cash for patients to buy ‘non-traditional’ treatments, such as homeopathy, but have been attacked as “ill-conceived” by academics and top NHS managers.

The comments came during an evidence session of the House of Commons Science and Technology meeting which is looking at the use of homeopathy on the NHS.

Answering a question on whether homeopathy should be included as an option in the personal budget pilots, Dr James Thallon, medical director of NHS West Kent, said the plans could lead to NHS money being used for “ineffective” treatments.

There are issues about whether or not they should be able to choose a treatment without any evidence of benefit and that happens when that treatment doesn’t work and the patient has to then have treatment on the NHS,” he said.

Also speaking at the session, Professor Edzard Ernst, professor of complementary medicine at Peninsula Medical School in Exeter, said it was an “ill-conceived notion” that patient choice had to dominate in healthcare.

“If the NHS commitment to evidence-based medicine is not to be anything more than lip-service, then money has to be spent on something else.

“I would argue that it is unnecessary, unreliable and unethical for homeopathy to be available on the NHS,” he said.

Read more at Pulse.

Time to discuss direct payments and personal health budgets

By Mike Broad - 24th November 2009 5:47 pm

The Health Act, which received royal assent on 12 November, will introduce direct payments into health care. 

Direct payments will be one way of delivering a personal health budget. They will involve giving money to individuals to allow them to buy their own healthcare in line with an agreed care plan.

They have been used in social care for several years and have been used to personalise services for service users. They constitute an important part of the Darzi Review and his vision for the NHS. The proposals for direct payments are currently being consulted on until 8 January.

Direct payments will be piloted in PCTs as part of the Department of Health’s wider personal health budget pilot programme. They will only be lawful in pilot schemes approved by the secretary of state - though the Bill allows for the possibility of extending health budgets more widely in future.

Regulations will govern how direct payments work, and how pilot schemes will operate. Wherever appropriate, the government has mirrored the approach already taken for direct payments in social care.

The consultation document sets out regulations and guidance required, and the following is a summary of that document:

1. Everyone in a pilot area who is capable of managing a direct payment (either on their own or with assistance), including people with learning disabilities or mental health needs, should be able to have one if they want one, and if the PCT believe their condition and circumstances are suitable, and meet the criteria  in the PCT’s pilot proposal.

2. Direct payments could be used in flexible, innovative ways to meet agreed health outcomes; they would not need to be spent on traditional NHS services. They could be spent on any services, as long as they are legal and appropriate for government to fund, and agreed in a care plan as meeting the patient’s health needs.

3. If an individual wants a direct payment but does not want to manage one, a nominated person could do this for them. In cases where an individual lacks capacity to consent to receive a direct payment, a representative could manage the budget on their behalf.

4. Before receiving a direct payment, the individual would have to agree a care plan with their care coordinator. This would set out the desired health outcomes, how they would be met (the services to be purchased) and the resources available (the budget).

5. All the information, advice, guidance and support an individual may need should be made available to enable them to make an informed decision on whether to have a direct payment (or other type of personal health budget) and to help them manage the budget. This would include advice on being an employer if they wanted to employ someone directly.

6. Any service that people purchase through a direct payment should meet all the regulatory requirements that it would need to meet if it was procured by traditional means; for example, staff should be vetted where necessary in line with existing legal requirements. PCTs would also be expected to consider the need for service providers to have indemnity cover, and discuss this with patients as part of the care planning process.

7. The individual or their nominated person would need to have a dedicated bank account or other distinct and secure means of receiving a direct payment. People receiving other forms of direct payments, for example for social care, would be allowed to use a single account for all their direct payments as long as the PCT was confident that adequate monitoring and auditing could take place.

8. It should be up to PCTs to calculate the amount of money in a direct payment (or other form of personal health budget). The amount allocated should meet the cost of all parts of the agreed care plan which are being met by the direct payment, and there would need to be regular reviews to ensure that the care plan was appropriate for meeting the individual’s needs, and that the money was being spent in line with the care plan.

9. The consultation document also discusses the setting up and evaluation of the direct payment pilots. It proposes that the health secretary should explicitly approve sites before they can offer direct payments; the pilots should run until 2012, but it would be possible to extend this if necessary; and an independent review should be commissioned to assess the effect of direct payments.

Read the full consultation document.

Doctors can offer their opinions by emailing personalhealthbudgets@dh.gsi.gov.uk

Read more on how direct payments work in social care.

Consultation on direct payments in health

By Mike Broad - 28th October 2009 9:05 am

Direct payments for healthcare moved a step closer this week with a new consultation launched by care services minister Phil Hope.

Personal health budgets are being piloted in PCTs to 2012. Direct payments are an important part of these pilots, having been offered in social care since 2005.

Millions of people now receive money to buy their own social care and the Health Bill is set to legalise direct payments in healthcare next month. It is intended that personal health budgets will help to create a more personalised NHS, by giving people more choice and control over how money is spent on their treatment and care. 

The consultation discusses the three ways a personal health budget could work: through a notional budget being held by a commissioner, such as a patient’s doctor or PCT; a budget managed on the individual’s behalf by a third party, like a charity or User Trust; or a cash payment to an individual patient and managed by them (a direct payment).

Trusts are already able to offer the first two options, which do not involve giving money directly to individuals. The consultation seeks views on the rules for making direct payments as well as proposals for setting up and evaluating direct payment pilots.

The proposed regulations show there will be more restrictions in the use of direct payments than in social care.

PCTs would have to carry out a Criminal Records Bureau check on anyone employed by a patient to care for a patient who is not a friend or family member of the patient, or a member of their household, and tell the patient the results. There is no such obligation on councils in relation to people hired by adult direct payment users so long as they possess capacity.

Patients would also have to provide more information to the PCT on how the direct payment is being spent. The consultation says PCTs should set local policies on what direct payments could be spent on, such as a course of physiotherapy or hydrotherapy for people suffering from long-term chronic pain; an air conditioner for someone suffering respiratory conditions, or complementary therapies, such as acupuncture.

A BMA spokesman expressed concern that direct payments further establishes the idea of healthcare as a commodity, reinforcing the concept of the market and undermining the principles of the NHS.

He added: “While we recognise that these proposals are being piloted, the BMA would welcome a range of practical questions being addressed as soon as possible.

“For example, if a patient’s budget runs out, would they be allowed to access it in subsequent years? If a patient spends less than their allocated budget, would they be encouraged to spend the remaining balance or would the money be returned to the NHS pot? How will care be priced? Will prices differ from PCT to PCT and/or between NHS and private providers?”

The consultation will run until 8 January 2010.

Care services minister Phil Hope said: “There are some really inspiring stories already from people whose lives have been transformed by personal budgets - they get more choice and control over their own care.

“By making direct payments available in healthcare I know many more people will feel the benefits. We want to make sure we get this right and I want everyone to have their say to make sure we do.”

Earlier this year, 70 sites from across the country were granted provisional pilot status - 20 will be evaluated in depth. Personal health budgets were originally proposed in Lord Darzi’s Next Stage Review.

Darzi Review and NHS modernisation: at-a-glance guide

By Mike Broad - 17th July 2009 5:01 pm

The government’s plans to reform the NHS over the next 10 years were laid out in the Darzi Review.

In 2007, colorectal surgeon Lord Ara Darzi was asked to conduct the review on health services in England and consulted with strategic health authorities and clinical pathway working groups to set future priorities.  

Darzi suggested that while the NHS was two thirds of the way through its modernisation programme - as set out in the NHS Plan in 2000 - further steps were needed. While the health service had increased capacity and driven down waiting times, quality and outcomes needed to be improved.

Other aims of the Darzi review included ensuring services were better joined up, care was more accessible and integrated, and services provided more patient control, choice and local accountability. There’s also been a drive to put clinical decision making at the centre of the reforms.

As the Darzi review took shape it echoed the themes of the white paper Our Health, Our Care, Our Say - particularly on choice, personalisation and community services - but there was a change in how it would be delivered. It was no longer about top down targets with a focus on outputs, but about quality and local determinism.

The key devices to achieving this are improved information on clinical performance, greater choice and control for patients and strengthened incentives for providers.

High Quality Care For All

The final report High Quality Care For All - NHS Next State Review Final Report was published in June 2008. It sets out how the NHS should move from centrally driven, target based management to one of empowered local services focused on quality as well as activity.

Darzi’s focus on raising quality

One of the key drivers of change will be a range of local quality indicators that will enable clinicians to benchmark and improve their performance. Areas measured will include mortality, complication and survival rates and patients’ views. 

Financially, funding formulas and contract payments will increasingly be linked to quality outcomes. All providers - NHS, private and third sector - will be required from April 2010 to publish Quality Accounts explaining how they made a difference.

Clinical Excellence Awards will be more focused on quality improvement. New awards conditional on clinical activity and quality indicators, and encourage clinical leadership and innovation.

Patient rights

The review proposed the new NHS Constitution, which spells out its principles and values and enshrines patient rights.

Patients will have a greater choice of GP practice, and ‘choice’ is a tenet of the constitution.

Patients are now guaranteed access to the most clinically and cost effective drugs and treatments. All patients will receive drugs and treatments approved by NICE where the clinician recommends them. NICE’s appraisals process is to be speeded up. Some have criticised it for being toothless.

In his first major speech as health secretary Andy Burnham outlined the developing system of accountability in the NHS, initiated by Darzi, and founded on a smaller number of agreed patient outcomes and fundamental rights. The NHS Constitution will sit alongside service guarantees linked to a minimum set of standards - rather than lots of volumetric targets - that will need to be maintained.  

Services closer to home  

Darzi had just produced his 10-year plan for the reorganisation of the NHS in London when he started his review. The London plan proposed the creation of larger specialist centres for the treatment of conditions such as stroke and heart attacks. This was combined with a network of 150 GP-led health centres providing a combination of services traditionally offered by GPs and district general hospitals.

Many of these ideas were also reflected in the interim report Our NHS Our future: NHS Next Stage Review

published in Oct 2007. This report included recommendations to introduce MRSA screening for hospital admissions and create 100 new GP practices in deprived areas.

It also controversially proposed to create 150 new health centres around the country which would provide extended range of services and longer opening hours. Polyclinics are intended to improve access and better integrate primary care practitioners with diagnostic and specialist services.

They are intended to reflect local needs and priorities, and be open from 8am to 8pm every day to fit with people’s lifestyles. Any member of the public can walk into a polyclinic regardless of which local GP service they are registered with, and people will be offered the opportunity to register at these new facilities.

However there are concerns that, despite a lack of clarity over their purpose, they are being rolled without being piloted.

And that polyclinics will compromise the coordination of care, prompt staff shortages and end up primarily nurse-led.

It’s looking increasingly likely that polyclinics will only be established in London.  

Personalised services in Darzi review

When consulting for the review, Darzi commented: “Patients have told me that they still sometimes feel like a number rather than a person…they lack ‘clout’ inside our health care system.”

Along with clarifying and strengthening patients rights, and giving them more choice over who treats them, the review also gives them more power over how they are treated.

Everyone with a long-term condition will have a personalised care plan and personalised health budgets will piloted, with direct payments used where possible.

Andy Burnham described personal budgets in his first major speech as the “ultimate expression of power and influence being handed down to the individual patient”. The DoH is due to pilot them among 5,000 patients with chronic conditions. “These pilots will give patients the power of the purse strings: making decisions with the help and guidance of GPs or consultants that directly affect their own budget is spent.”

A more preventative approach to public health

The NHS, through partnership working, will focus on improving health alongside treatment. Every PCT will commission comprehensive wellbeing and prevention services in partnership with local authorities. And there’s a new coalition for Better Health with voluntary agreements between the Government, private sector and charities to improve health. GP’s Quality and Outcomes Framework is to be improved to provide incentives for maintaining health as well as providing care. 

Better guidance and regulation

The Care Quality Commission will have new enforcement powers to improve safety and reduce healthcare associated infection.

NICE will be expanded to set and approve more independent quality standards. A New National Quality Board will set priorities and feedback to government.

Promoting innovation

There is new emphasis on innovation and fostering an enterprise culture. Strategic health authorities will be under a statutory duty to promote innovation and regional innovation funds will be launched to invest on a commercial basis in good ideas. There will be a pilot programme of ‘health innovation and education clusters’ to stimulate partnership working between clinicians, universities and business.

Empowering staff

More support is promised in the Darzi review for clinicians who want to move out of the NHS to set up independent social enterprises. Their pensions will be protected. Integrated care organisations will also be piloted, bringing together health and social care professionals together. There is also a pledge to reinvigorate practice-based commissioning and give greater freedoms and support to high-performing GP practices to develop new services for patients.

Clinical leadership will strengthened, with medical directors and quality boards featuring at regional and national level.

Darzi review update – one year on

Darzi launched a new set of proposals in High Quality Care For All: Our Journey So Far, which charts the progress of the Darzi Review one year on.

Clinical budget ownership is to be extended to hospital doctors and nurses, with the aim of promoting entrepreneurship and innovation in service delivery.

Two “obsolete” clinical targets are also to be removed: the 13-week outpatient and 26-week inpatient performance targets. A review into other targets was also launched.

A voluntary peer review accreditation system will also be introduced to assess the standards of clinical teams and create competition among clinicians to improve. The royal colleges are currently developing a consistent approach, and it will be overseen by the National Quality Board.

Darzi’s resignation

Lord Darzi resigned, in July 2009, returning to research and surgery. While the public reason for his early departure was his concern for his patients, it’s been suggested he found the culture of Whitehall challenging.

Health secretary will bin “superfluous” targets

By Mike Broad - 17th June 2009 8:00 am

The new health secretary pledged to rid the NHS of superfluous national targets in favour of a set of clearer, simpler standards in his first major speech.

Andy Burnham, who was appointed in the Prime Minister’s cabinet reshuffle last week, explained that the Department of Health would be prioritising quality of care and patient empowerment as proposed in the Darzi Review.

He said: “So what does this mean for targets? I think it offers the chance to change the debate about targets fundamentally and deep clean the target regime so that it achieves what we all want: better patient care, more staff satisfaction.

“Targets have their time and place. When they meet, and where they are important, they should become permanent minimum service standards. But where they have served their purpose – and are subsidiary or contributory – they should be removed and believe me, I will do that.”

Speaking to managers at their annual conference, he outlined a new system of accountability for the NHS, based on a smaller number of agreed patient outcomes and fundamental rights. The NHS Constitution, with its patients’ rights, will sit alongside service guarantees linked to a minimum set of standards that will need to be maintained.  

“We’ve got to make sure minimum standards are fairer and more focused on local contexts than the targets that precede them,” he said.

Burnham described the impact of the downturn on the NHS as a “moment of opportunity, not threat” and said that through improving the quality of services and developing a more preventative approach both efficiency and patient experience would be improved.

He also outlined his determination to introduce personal budgets for patients describing them as the “ultimate expression of power and influence being handed down to the individual patient”. The DoH is about to pilot the use of direct payments by patients for their care.

He said: “These pilots will give patients the power of the purse strings: making decisions with the help and guidance of GPs or consultants that directly affect how their own budget is spent.”

Commenting on his speech, HCSA chief executive Stephen Campion said: “If Andy Burnham now accepts that national targets need to be ‘deep cleaned’ and that many of them are superfluous, then I am delighted. I am only sorry that his predecessors failed to see the light as he appears to have done.

“The HCSA has consistently called for quality standards as opposed to dogmatic targets and we shall be very interested to see the extent to which this new approach is taken. I think this is a case of watch this space to see whether this policy change does actually happen.”