Posts Tagged ‘Inspection’

Patients at risk as inspections cut by regulator

By Mike Broad - 20th September 2011 11:50 am

Patients are being put at risk because hospitals and care homes are only being inspected every two years, a health select committee report concludes.

Following its annual review of the work of the Care Quality Commission, the select committee reports that the care regulator’s move away from its core function of inspection, towards the essentially administrative task of registration, represents a significant distortion of priorities.

Stephen Dorrell MP, chair of the committee, said: “In its review of the CQC, the committee concluded that the organisation’s priorities became distorted by a statutory deadline for the registration of dentists and that this distortion led directly to a drop of 70% in inspection activity during the second half of 2010-11 compared with the same period in the previous year.

“The primary causes of this distortion, which resulted in increased risk to patients, were the unrealistic statutory obligations imposed on the CQC.”

The report says the regulator was established without a clear and realistic definition of its priorities and objectives, and the timescales and resource implications were not properly analysed.

The registration process the CQC has tried to implement was not properly tested and proven before it was rolled out.

The report welcomes the government’s decision to postpone registration of GP practices, and recommends that proper planning, including piloting of the model for registration, should be undertaken before the revised implementation date of April 2013 is confirmed.

Commenting on the report, Sir Richard Thompson, president of the Royal College of Physicians, said: “Raising quality across the NHS is essential. The focus on quality must not be lost in this period of efficiency savings and reform.

“It is crucial for clinical advice and patient involvement to be embedded into CQC’s and Monitor’s processes. Doctors working on hospital wards and in primary care understand their patients’ needs and can advise health care regulators accordingly. We also urge the government to plan for the eventual recommendations from the current Francis Inquiry to be embedded in the regulatory process.”

Robert Francis QC chaired the inquiry into the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust and examined the operation of the commissioning, supervisory and regulatory bodies responsible for the trust. The inquiry’s recommendations are expected later this year.

The health select committee report also stresses the importance of the role of inspectors in assessing the culture in care providers.

Dorrell said: “CQC inspectors cannot hope to uncover every failure of care; they can and should, however, focus on the culture of the organisation to ensure that professionalism is respected and that the proper systems of reporting and accountability operate effectively.

“We are often asked what assurance can be given to whistleblowers. The best answer is to secure an open culture in which the professional obligation to raise concerns is embedded and respected. That is what CQC inspectors should be looking for - and why their inspection activity is so important to patients.”

Read the full report.

It could be worse - we could be teachers

By Katherine Teale - 22nd February 2010 11:23 am

This Sunday has been a difficult day for the Teale household, although, glancing at today’s headlines, possibly not as difficult as Gordon Brown’s.

My husband has spent the day writing his CV in preparation for reapplying for his job. The school of which he is headmaster is being amalgamated with another due to falling school roles. Worryingly, all the recent local amalgamations have appointed external head teachers, making the sitting tenants redundant, so it’s a nail-biting time for us.

My husband tells me, bitterly, that doctors don’t know they’re born, which makes for lively dinner-time conversation - but in some ways I have to admit he may have a point.

Despite the attractive holidays, being a teacher is not the sinecure it’s widely thought to be. As a school governor, I recently sat on an appointments panel for a newly-qualified teacher. We had 138 applicants for the job, and short-listed 11, all of whom had fantastic CV’s with only marginally fewer ‘A stars’ than those I used to see during my college tutor days. Of the eight we interviewed, all were articulate, bright and appealing young people. This for a starting salary of £25,000.

Once fortunate enough to be appointed, teachers have to undergo regular scrutiny by their senior management team, and then, during thee-yearly OFSTED visits, by the dreaded inspectors, who make personal criticisms of their teaching and grade them from inadequate to outstanding.

For a lesson to be graded good or outstanding, the teacher will need to have prepared the lesson in detail, with clear lesson targets, and also be able to demonstrate whether those targets were met. They must have a clear idea of, and plan for, the progress of every child in their class. The head teacher is personally judged by OFSTED, and has his or her name plastered all over the local papers should the school get a bad report, which, unlike the case of MPs, generally results in a resignation.

Doctors have so far been largely spared this sort of direct and public scrutiny, other than by the imperfect appraisal system, and, for surgeons, having their mortality rates published on systems such as Dr Foster. Nobody’s standing in the corner watching us give an anaesthetic or take out someone’s lumbar disc, or run a chronic renal failure clinic. This may be the future, though. 

To keep the peace I’ve conceded that teachers have a tough time - however, one thing we both agree on is that both schools and the NHS are unfairly criticised for things beyond our control. The NHS is castigated for not  producing the longest life expectancy and the highest cancer survival rates, but it can no more cure all the obesity, alcoholism and depression which are the by-products of the society we live in, than schools can prevent delinquency, teenage pregnancy and poor parenting.

If we seriously tried to prevent these problems happening in the first place, we probably wouldn’t need to be looking at front-line service cuts at all. Let’s hope the next government tackles this end of the equation, although I don’t hold out much hope. It’s just much easier to blame the teachers and doctors for not being able to sort out the mess. 

Two weeks until interview day. By the time you read my next blog, I might be the family’s sole breadwinner, so wish us luck…