Posts Tagged ‘expert witness’

Acting as an expert witness - advice for hospital consultants

By Dr Mike Roddis, director of Healthcare Performance - 12th August 2011 2:29 pm

The Medical Defence Union has developed new guidance for doctors embarking on their first consultant post. In the eighth in a series of articles guiding you through the more common non-clinical challenges a consultant may face, Dr Mike Roddis from Healthcare Performance discusses the role of expert witnesses.

Expert witnesses play a part in many court proceedings and committees. Medical professionals with sufficient experience in their chosen field are often called upon to provide an impartial opinion, based on their medical knowledge and expertise.

The role of an expert witness is a very important one. The information they provide is used in official proceedings such as those in a court of law and will impact the overall outcome of the case. Therefore, it is important that any medical professional considering taking on the role, has the necessary experience in the appropriate field.

What experience is needed to become an expert witness?

When considering whether the time is right to become an expert witness, medical professionals should remember that experience is key. It is necessary to have an extensive level of background knowledge in a specialism before becoming an expert witness and this level is unlikely to be reached without at least 10-15 years’ experience of working in that area.

Once the decision has been made to become an expert witness, many medical professionals decide to sign up for specialist training courses aimed at training experts in writing reports, the legal process and court appearances.

Once completed, these training courses can be added to the doctor’s CV which should provide a comprehensive overview of all experience, including teaching posts, publications and lectureships. There are directories which contain details of all the expert witnesses in the UK. Usually once a doctor decides that they would like to be an expert witness, they will apply to be a member of one of these directories.

What does an expert witness do?

Once registered as an expert witness, there are a number of duties that a medical professional may be requested to fulfil. In any case, an expert witness may need to do one or all of these:

1. Report writing

Report writing is a key starting point of an expert witness’s involvement in a case. Once the relevant documents are available, they will have to write a carefully considered report, which must express an independent opinion about the medical issues. The report must be supported with evidence such as published articles which have previously appeared in case journals or textbooks.

The conduct of civil cases is governed by the Civil Procedure Rules and an expert witness report must comply with these rules. These were created to ensure that experts are independent and reports are written for the court rather than the party that has requested it. The expert must sign the report at the end to declare that they understand, and have complied with, their duty to the Court. If an expert does not observe the rules, they may find they are subject to criticism and the credibility of their evidence and of their position as an expert witness may be brought into question.

2. Sharing report findings

An expert witness will work as part of a wider team of people involved in the case including barristers and solicitors and will need to discuss their expert opinion of the matter with other team members. This discussion allows solicitors an opportunity to discover any weaknesses in the case and uncover any further medical issues. The legal team is likely to then base their decision on how to proceed with the case based on the expert’s advice.

3. Meeting with other expert witnesses

In many cases, there will be multiple expert witnesses involved who are instructed by different parties. The expert witnesses are expected to meet to discuss the case and see if any details and opinions about the case can be agreed. This helps to narrow down the issues that have to be heard at trial.

4. Attending hearings

In general, cases are often resolved before the hearing stage. However, when a case does reach trial, either in court or at the GMC, experts witnesses are put to the test. They are expected to know their report in detail and be able to answer questions about it in both a competent and credible manner when they are cross-examined by the other party. It is important that any questions asked are answered fully and that the expert witness does not change or adjust their opinion under cross-examination so as not to undermine the credibility of the report.

All in the timing

When the time is right, working as an expert witness can be an exciting and fulfilling next step for a consultant. Although rewarding, it is also a challenging role and so it is vital that any consultant considering making the step into expert witness work ensures they have the necessary experience and knowledge to carry out the role fully and with credibility.

Professor “dishonest” over medico legal report

By Mike Broad - 6th October 2009 9:01 am

A retired professor has been suspended for misleading the legal aid authorities over the amount of time he spent compiling an expert witness report for a court case.

Stewart Goodwin, a former professor of microbiology, has been found guilty of dishonesty and had his registration suspended for 12 months by the GMC.

In 2006, Goodwin provided an expert medico legal report for a firm of solicitors and invoiced them for five hours work at £350 an hour - an unacceptable rate for the Legal Services Commission (LSC), which is publicly funded.  

Two months later, Goodwin re-issued the invoice with a reduced hourly rate of £200 an hour, which he knew would be more acceptable to LSC, but listing an increase in the number of hours worked (now 8.5 hours).

This followed an exchange of correspondence, in 2005, with a firm of solicitors who had requested that he act as an expert witness. Goodwin indicated an intention to mislead the LSC in order to obtain financial advantage.

He also expressed a willingness to provide a false estimate of the numbers of hours likely to be worked in the preparation of a medico legal report in order to obtain an enhanced fee.

The GMC panel concluded that the conduct was dishonest, misleading and likely to bring the profession into disrepute.

Despite Goodwin being fully retired, with no intention of performing medico legal work or practising in the future, the panel suspended his registration for 12 months.

The panel concluded that “this period would be sufficient to send out a signal to you, the public and the profession that such conduct is unacceptable, whilst upholding public confidence in the profession. It would also allow you time to reflect on your behaviour.”

In reaching its decision, the Panel said it had “borne in mind the principles contained within the GMC’s publication Good Medical Practice…in particular, paragraph 54, under the heading of Probity: You must be honest in financial and commercial dealings with employers, insurers and other organisations or individuals.”

How to become a medical expert witness

By Mike Broad - 1st June 2009 10:54 am

An expert witness is qualified by their knowledge and experience to give an independent opinion on a specific issue in court.

Role of a medical expert witness

The medical expert offers an opinion on the facts of the case. This can be based on written notes and documents, or through an examination of the patient. The medical expert is not the treating doctor.

While their opinion is provided at the request of one or other of the parties involved in the claim, the duty of the medical expert witness is to assist the court rather than the party who instructs them.

The medical expert’s report or comments must be independent, objective and unbiased. The doctor’s expertise helps the court decide the matter before it, and may be used to diminish the other side’s case. It can lead to appearing as a witness in court and having the opinion tested by cross examination.

The role can vary from considering a breach of duty in a clinical negligence claim, offering opinions on liability and causation, to examining a claimant and discussing their treatment and what could be offered.

A medical expert witness should not be confused with a professional witness. The former provides an expert medical opinion on a case, whereas the latter is requested to testify solely on the observed facts of a case.

Who can be an expert witness?

Doctors put themselves forward as experts. Mail-shots can be sent to local law firms. It is also possible to advertise on the internet and/or in the legal press.

However, the most common way doctors promote their expertise is through registering with organisations that maintain expert witness databases. There are a number of them and they have varying degrees of rigour in determining eligibility for entry. None are endorsed by medical institutions:

Society of Expert Witnesses

Academy of Experts

Expert Witness Institute

UK Register of Expert Witnesses

The Expert Witness  

Expert Witness

The Council for the Registration of Forensic Practitioners

How much does a medical expert witness get paid?

It varies. Research suggests that they range from £50 per hour up to £200 per hour. Fees are however under pressure.

Skills required of a medical expert witness

The most obvious is a sound knowledge and practical experience of the subject matter in dispute. Additional skills needed include an ability to communicate findings and opinions clearly, concisely and in terms adapted to the court or tribunal. Doctors are advised to seek training on report writing and courtroom presentation skills.

Understanding the responsibilities of being an expert witness

Doctors are advised to understand the duties of the role before putting themselves forward. A good understanding can be developed by attending a relevant, CPD-approved course. They should also consider organising a proper induction into expert witness work, particularly in those specialties frequently called on to assist the court. 

The GMC’s guidance Good Medical Practice, which sets out the principles which underpin good care, includes information relevant to doctors working as expert witnesses.

Paragraph 51 states: “You must be honest and trustworthy when writing reports, completing or signing forms, or providing evidence in litigation or other formal inquiries. This means that you must take reasonable steps to verify any statement before you sign a document. You must not write or sign documents which are false or misleading because they omit relevant information. If you have agreed to prepare a report, complete or sign a document or provide evidence, you must do so without unreasonable delay.”

To meet these principles, medical expert witnesses should ensure that their statements, reports and verbal evidence are: straightforward, rather than intentionally misleading or biased; as objective as possible and not omitting material or information which does not support the opinion expressed or conclusions reached; and properly and fully researched.

Appointment process to being a medical expert witness

It is the court’s responsibility to decide whether a doctor is an ‘expert’. The court should examine the following issues in establishing the credibility of the medical expert: is the expert’s area of practice and expertise relevant? When did they last saw a relevant case in their practice? Is their view is widely held? Have they been trained as a medical expert? Are they up-to-date on CPD and in good standing with their royal college? Doctors should only put themselves forward if they are comfortable with the answers.

Questions to consider when taking a case as an expert witness?

1. What type of case is it?

2. On whose behalf are you being instructed?

3. What are the timescales involved, and how much time will be involved?

4. Has the fee scale been agreed?

5. Are you an expert in this area? Can you provide references that support your evidence?

6. What are the implications for you if the court does not accept your evidence?

Professional conduct issues

There are salutary lessons for all medical expert witnesses from the case of Professor Sir Roy Meadow. These particularly concern the provision of poor or misleading evidence, or evidence drawn from outside one’s expertise.  

Paediatrician Sir Roy came to prominence for his research into Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy and his crusade against parents who harm their children.

He appeared as an expert witness for the prosecution in several child murder trials. Meadows was struck off by the GMC in 2005 after he was found to have offered “erroneous” and “misleading” evidence in the Sally Clark case. Clark was a lawyer wrongly convicted in 1999 of the murder of her two baby sons. At her trial, Sir Roy said the odds of two children from such an affluent family dying of natural causes were one in 73 million. His claim was later disputed by the Royal Statistical Society. Clark’s conviction was quashed in 2003.

Meadow appealed to the High Court, which ruled in his favour in 2006 by a majority decision. The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision in part, ruling that Meadow’s misconduct was not sufficiently serious to merit the punishment he received.

The Court of Appeal did, however, over turn the High Court’s finding that expert witnesses should ordinarily be immune from regulatory bodies disciplinary hearings. Expert witnesses continue to be immune from civil litigation in respect of the evidence they give.

In 2004, the Deputy Chief Justice was scathing about Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy in setting out the reasons for Angela Cannings’ appeal – another mother wrongfully convicted of murdering her child. It led to the overturning of a number of convictions. The law was changed so that no person can be convicted on the basis of expert testimony alone.

Messages for medical expert witnesses

1. Recognise the overriding duty to the court and to the administration of justice. 

2. Give opinion and evidence within the limits of professional competence. 

3. Keep up to date with your specialist area of practice.

4. Explain, where appropriate, that there are a range of views on a particular issue. 

5. Take appropriate action if your opinion changes

More information

BMA guidance

Crown Prosecution Service  

Code of practice and directory in Scotland

Criminal procedure and court rules in Scotland

EuroExpert

Bond Solon

The Law Society of England & Wales

Academy of Medical Royal Colleges