Posts Tagged ‘Exams’

GMC to review exam ruling following uproar

By Francesca Robinson - 4th May 2010 9:03 am

A review of the legality of exams taken outside approved training posts has been announced by the GMC following uproar from trainees concerned that their qualifications may no longer be valid.

Anxiety was sparked among trainees last month when the GMC published a note clarifying legislation which states that exams must be taken within an approved training post in order to count towards a CCT (certificate of completion of training).

This ruling affects doctors who passed exams when they were not on training programmes and those who took exams during periods of unapproved training or work experience overseas.

In a bid to calm nerves, the GMC says that it will not be reviewing any CCTs which may already have been erroneously awarded.

It has also clarified that trainees who are not affected are those who sit exams during the foundation programme, are undertaking research, on maternity leave or working overseas - providing they maintain their training status.

Doctors who fall foul of the new ruling can gain entry to the specialist register via one of the equivalence routes and most can do the CP (combined programme) which is more straightforward and lower in cost than a CESR (certificate of eligibility for specialist registration), says the GMC.

The regulator says it will now explore whether it is possible to amend the legislation to provide greater flexibility around the timing of exams. 

But in a letter to trainees GMC chair Professor Peter Rubin says the bottom line is that the integrity and educational coherence of approved training programmes must be maintained.

The GMC plans to meet with the royal colleges, the deaneries, the BMA and the four UK health departments to develop a “pragmatic approach” to resolving this issue.

Professor Bill Burr, medical director of the Joint Royal Colleges of Physicians Training Board described the GMC ruling as “counter-intuitive, illogical and inconsistent” with the way training has been conducted in the UK.

“It is not sufficient to tell trainees that they are eligible for CESR (CP). In spite of claims to the contrary this continues to be viewed as an inferior qualification to CCT and in practice is a lesser qualification since it has no European recognition,” he said.

The ruling is causing problems for deaneries who are now having to gear themselves up to deal with doctors needing remediation in order to complete the MRCP. Problems could be massively compounded by doctors who decide to retake all or part of the MRCP to qualify for CCT, claimed Burr.

Royal College of Surgeons president Mr John Black said the The Joint Committee on Surgical Training was concerned that those responsible for administering programmes may face logistical problems trying to keep trainees in training posts until they pass exams. “We hope further discussions with the GMC will help unravel these issues,” he said.

The BMA’s junior doctors committee said the issue has caused “great anxiety “ among juniors. Committee chair Dr Shree Datta insisted that no additional juniors should be affected by any changes and action must be taken to reverse the negative effects of the GMC’s advice.

Changes after doctors forced to repeat finals

By Mike Broad - 2nd February 2010 5:53 pm

A medical school is changing the way it manages examination results after four practising doctors were forced to repeat their finals when it was discovered they’d wrongly been awarded passes.  

Cardiff University School of Medicine’s changes include creating two new positions aimed improving the analysis and management of assessment data, and bringing forward the final written exam.

BMA Cymru warned that the reputation of medical education in Wales depended upon the changes preventing a similar error in the future.

The four medical students were told they had passed their finals last summer and started working as doctors. But, when the mistake was uncovered, they were suspended from duty and are now repeating their final year.

Professor Paul Morgan, dean of medicine at Cardiff University, said: “The School of Medicine recognises the seriousness of the issues which have been raised through the investigation and I reiterate my personal apology to those students affected.

“The school will be undertaking all the action required to ensure that such errors cannot be repeated. The implementation of the recommendations is regarded as an absolute and high level priority.”

Following an investigation into the mistake, two appointments are being made: an assessment data manager, who will be responsible for the capture, secure storage and reporting of assessment data; and an academic psychometrician, who will be responsible for analysing assessment data and ensuring that examinations and other assessment activities in the school are fair and robust.  

A new director of medical education has also recently been appointed, with responsibility for oversight of all aspects of the five year undergraduate course.

The final written examinations have been brought forward to May 2010 to allow more time to verify the results, and a monitoring group has been set up by the university to oversee the changes.

Dr Richard Lewis, the BMA’s Welsh secretary, said: “We sincerely hope that the measures taken by the university, including the appointment of a director of medical education and an assessment data manager, together with implementing the recommendations of this investigation, will ensure that such events will never happen again.

“The reputation of medical education in Wales depends upon it.”

RCPsych must reconsider examination decision

By Dr Waqqas Khokhar, CT3 trainee - 19th January 2010 9:33 am

A grave injustice has been inflicted on psychiatric trainees - particularly the staff and associate specialist group - by its own royal college. The Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) has seen fit to invalidate a pass in MRCPsych Part 1 retrospectively.

Under the old system, the exams were divided into Parts 1 and 2. Each part had a written and a clinical component. But, the RCPsych changed its exams to three written papers followed by a clinical assessment of skills and competencies examination (CASC).

In this system, a pass in paper 1 and 2 can be banked forever. However, after passing paper 3 of the exam, you get four chances at CASC. If you fail to pass it within an allocated timeframe, you are expected to re-sit paper 3 and then the cycle continues.

Part of the process was that the college set a validity period for those who hold a pass in Part I of the previous format. The college decided that a pass in Part I will be expired, and will not count towards completing the membership exams, by July 2010.

The trainees were not aware or informed that this could be the case when they sat for this exam. The regulations of the previous format of the exam (to the best of our knowledge) did not state a number on attempts or period of validity.

Part I candidates had to endure the stress of sitting the OSCE exam, which took a lot of effort and competence. This is now going to be discarded, and candidates are disadvantaged by the above decision. What makes it worse is the fact that the college decided to consider a pass in papers 1 and 2 permanent in the new exam system.

This has been a source of great distress for many trainees and SAS doctors who feel cheated and abused at the hands of their own college. What a waste of time and money for them.

The specialty of psychiatry is already experiencing the consequences of the MMC debacle. Recruitment and retention problems in this already battered specialty are surfacing and this decision will further aggravate the problem as many people are considering working abroad. Countries like Australia and Canada are already actively recruiting experienced psychiatrists from the UK.

A group of trainee and SAS psychiatrists have recently set up an e-petition calling for the RCPsych to reconsider its decision. It’s been signed by 200 doctors and I urge readers to put their names towards helping our cause.

We are even considering a legal challenge. It’s time the college listened to its trainees and SAS doctors whose careers are being compromised.

Junior doctors suspended over exam error

BBC - 20th August 2009 9:41 am

Four junior hospital doctors who were wrongly told they had passed all their final exams at Cardiff School of Medicine have been suspended.

The four started work at hospitals across south Wales two weeks ago after completing their studies. Cardiff University has found the four were given the wrong exam result for one module of their degree.

The hospital trusts say they would have been heavily supervised and made no significant decisions on patient care. However, as a precautionary measure Hywel Dda NHS Trust, which is responsible for Llanelli’s Prince Philip Hospital and Withybush General Hospitals, has decided to review the care of patients seen by the students.

The four students have been working as junior doctors at Llandough Hospital in Cardiff, Swansea’s Singleton and Morriston hospitals, Prince Philip Hospital in Llanelli and Withybush General Hospital at Haverfordwest.

Read more on BBC.