Posts Tagged ‘Abortion’

Abortion: why can’t I be a conscientious objector?

By Monica Lalanda - 2nd August 2010 10:59 am

We have a brand new abortion law in Spain, it is called something like Law on Sexual Health and Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy and it replaces the previous one, which was already 25 years old. Some people describe it as one of the most liberal of its kind in Europe even when the rest of the world still think of Spain as a very traditional and catholic country.

With this new piece of legislation, Spanish women will be able to request a free abortion up to week 14/40 without needing any excuses and up to week 22 if there is any risk for their health or their lives, and beyond then if there is serious fetal malformation.

In 2008, there were 115,000 abortions according to the Ministry of Health but since the morning after pill became available without prescription on January 2010, there has been a decrease of 9% in the abortion rate.

This law has been approved after a lot of controversy and against the will of the Spanish Conservative Party (Partido Popular) but there is currently a great campaign against it by doctors themselves and led by the Organización Médica Colegial (which is like a mixture of the BMA and GMC).

The reasons for this fight are twofold. First, the new law makes allowances for doctors and other health workers with issues of conscience to be allowed to refuse taking direct part in an abortion but is leaving all those doctors who might need to be involved in an indirect way without any legal cover. For example, a GP who is approached by a patient requesting an abortion will not have the chance from a legal point of view to object getting involved. The second issue that is creating uneasiness is the situation is with 16 and 17 year old girls who want to abort. These young women do not need parental consent but they have to show that at least one parent or legal tutor is informed and they have to attend the abortion clinic with them. However if the girl can prove that informing her parents could cause her a serious conflict it is the doctor who takes the responsibility.

So, now that I have told you where we are at, I’ll get on with my blogging. My personal opinion about abortion and whether it is right or wrong is somehow unclear, I find myself unable to stand up and say either that I am in favour or I am against it in a blank way and for all cases; I guess I can probably understand some of the women that go for it and I can be very judgemental with others. I don’t think I would ever choose to have an abortion myself but I don’t know how I would react if my daughter ever wants to have one. No black or white there.

However when it comes to my medical opinion, I am very certain of what I think. I want to stick to the most basic principles of medicine, the kind of medical ethics that will allow me to look at myself in the mirror every morning and be comfortable with it. I refuse to be involved in abortions on the principle of primum non nocere, I simply don’t want to cause any harm to any human beings born or unborn. It is upsetting to know that if a woman asks me to refer her for an abortion, I’ll have no choice as the law does not to allow me to be a conscientious objector. I do respect the doctors who agree to it, or the women that go for it, but I never want to take any part on it.

It will be interesting to watch what happens from now on, it is unlikely that any other changes will be introduced so it will be outrageous to watch a doctor being penalised for practising the sort of medicine he or she strongly believes on.

“I shot abortion doctor to protect children”

The Guardian - 29th January 2010 1:22 pm

A born-again Christian who believes abortion is a sin failed yesterday to ­convince a judge that he need not stand trial for murder after he admitted shooting dead an ­abortion doctor.

Scott Roeder, 51, told the court in Wichita, Kansas, that on 30 May 2009, the day before he shot George Tiller, he had bought a .22-calibre gun and bullets and then practised target shooting with his brother. He checked into a motel in Wichita and the next day followed Tiller to the Reformation Lutheran church, where the doctor was an usher.

His defence lawyer asked: “Did you go and shoot Dr Tiller?” Roeder replied: “Yes.”

The fact Roeder was the killer, with a single shot to the head, was not in doubt, but the confession was an attempted defence that he felt forced to act to save the lives of unborn children. He has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder, and it was the first time in US legal history that an anti-abortionist was allowed to present the jury with his justification for murder.

The judge, Warren Wilbert, dismayed pro-abortionists and doctors this month when he ruled that Roeder could present his justification. They feared that if a jury were to find him guilty of just manslaughter it would encourage more attacks. But after Roeder gave his evidence, Wilbert ruled that the jury could not consider the lesser charge, since abortion, including late-term abortion, is legal in Kansas, and Tiller did not pose an imminent threat.

Tiller had long been a target for anti-abortionists as he was one of few doctors prepared to ­perform legal abortions after 21 weeks of gestation. In 1986 his clinic was bombed and in 1993 he was shot in both arms, but he carried on working.

Read more at The Guardian.

Six years for poison abortion bid hospital doctor

BBC Health - 16th November 2009 11:54 am

A doctor who attempted to poison his lover in a bid to induce a miscarriage has been jailed for six years.

Edward Erin, 44, of west London, spiked 33-year-old Bella Prowse’s drinks after she became pregnant but refused to have a termination, the Old Bailey heard.

Miss Prowse, a secretary at the hospital where Erin worked, noticed her coffee and juice had been tampered with, and drug traces were later found.

Erin was found guilty of two charges of attempting to administer poison.

Sentencing the married father-of-two, who is originally from Caerphilly in South Wales, Judge Richard Hone called Erin “a liar, a cheat and a predator”.

He said the doctor, who worked at St Mary’s Hospital, led a fantasy life and had “betrayed his profession and his family”.

He added that Erin’s wife “deserves somebody better than you who goes on the prowl”.

Dr Lowri Erin had defended her husband during the trial and said that she was aware of his affairs.

Read more at BBC Health.

Three babies aborted every day due to Down’s

The Telegraph - 27th October 2009 12:57 pm

An increasing number of pregnant women are being told their babies have the condition because of a growing number of women putting off having children until their 30s and 40s and improvements in screening, doctors say.

And around nine in ten women who are told they are going to have a baby with the problem opt for a termination.

The research shows that around 1,100 babies in England and Wales are aborted every year because of Down’s syndrome, an increase from 300 in 1989/90.

The findings have led Down’s Syndrome support organisations to call for greater counselling to help parents make the right decision for them.

Prof Joan Morris, professor of medical statistics who carried out the research at Queen Mary, University of London, said: “We are getting more pregnancies with Down’s syndrome because women are having their babies older and because we are screening more accurately and screening more women, there are more terminations.

“It is important that women have the full information. There is a group of women out there who don’t want screening because they would not terminate anyway and that is a good thing if that is what they want.”

Read more at The Telegraph.