Hospital Dr News

MPs call for improved training of juniors

More must be done to reconcile reduced working hours for junior doctors with meeting their training needs, reports an inquiry by the Health Select Committee.

Dr Patricia Hamilton, director of medical education at the Department of Health, told the inquiry into education, training and workforce planning that work was underway to move away from junior doctors providing most of the service to a more “consultant-present” service.

Christine Outram chief executive of Medical Education England (MEE) said some hospitals had already begun to structure their hours differently so that more senior doctors were available to oversee the work of juniors and give guidance and advice  when needed. The intention was to spread this good practice.

MEE chairman Professor Sir Christopher Edwards, said some hospitals had shown it was possible to change working patterns to accommodate the European Working time Regulations (EWTR) and allow junior doctors to access training.

Dr Tom Dolphin, chair of the BMA’s junior doctors committee, said their preferred  model was a “trained-doctor” service. This would involve using all trained doctors – consultants, GPs, clinical academics and staff and associate specialists – to ensure that the service was not so reliant on juniors. This would give juniors more opportunities to get the training they needed within the 48-hour week. In some cases the curriculum might have to be extended to cover an extra year but it would be for each individual specialty to make that decision.

“While training occurs through exposure to patients and delivering patient care, our view is that junior doctors ought to be viewed as being employed primarily to train. It is the current arrangement they have for GP trainees and we think that ought to be the same in hospitals,” said Dolphin.

Professor David Sowden, chair of the Conference of Postgraduate Medical Deans of the UK (COPMeD) said there was a case for a new “modularised” approach to training based on credentialing. This would involve doctors reaching certain levels which would allow them to do a set range of activities within the system.  This would enable trainees to step on and off the education and training escalator in contrast to the current relatively inflexible system.

The all-party committee of MPs conclude: “We have received a broad basis of evidence which shows how it is possible to reconcile reasonable hours for junior doctors with high quality training and, most importantly, high standards of care for patients.”

But a spokesman for the Royal College of Physicians said they felt the committee had failed to recognise the difficulties caused by limitation of the hours for training doctors particularly in acute medicine caused by EWTR and New Deal. The RCP was calling for greater flexibility in application of these policies.

The report goes on to warn that the government’s plans to reform handling of the £5 billion annual training budget lack clarity. MPs are particularly concerned about the lack of detail about how postgraduate medical deaneries, Local Education and Training Boards (LETBE’s) and Health Education England will fit into the new system.

Committee chair Stephen Dorrell said the government had not yet published a detailed plan of how the new structures were intended to work. “We are concerned about this apparent lack of urgency and we believe that failure to address these issues quickly will lead to risk for patients and confusion for staff,” he said.

Professor Wendy Reid, vice president (education) of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, said: “We welcome this report as it highlights the gaps in postgraduate medical education and training – gaps which require further thought if our system is to maintain its reputation of being world class.”

RCP president Sir Richard Thompson, said: “Postgraduate deans need to be integrated into the new education and training system as soon as possible to prevent uncertainty. We must also improve national workforce planning, so as to have not just enough doctors to treat the growing numbers of acute medical patients, but the right doctors in the right places to ensure high standards of care for patients everywhere.”

Read the report.

Bookmark and Share

3 Responses to “MPs call for improved training of juniors”

  1. Malcolm Morrison says:

    A few points. First, the EWTRs were not designed to deal with the professions – more for ‘the factory floor’. Second, I know of no one in any position of responsibility who worked only 48hrs whilst ‘on the way up’. Third, I know of very few people in positions of responsibility who only work 48hrs even after they ‘have arrived’!

    In medicine, there are some specialties that have a high commitment to emergency work; and some with little OOH (Out Of Hours) commitment; so needs differ. If consultants or other ‘senior staff’ are to run a “consultant-present” serivice, then their contracts and job plans must reflect this – and they, too, are subject to the EWTRs!

    Certainly ‘traininjg posts’ should be primarily for training; though part of training must involve dealing with patients – so an element of ‘service’ must be a part of training, including the care of emergencies. But that does not mean that their ‘job plan’ should be designed around their ‘covering’ the OOHs care to the detriment of being able to get proper training under supervision – particularly in learning practical procedures (e.g operating)
    Retired Orthopod

  2. joshek says:

    WOW – the voice of reason at long last. Of course it is possible to meet juniors training needs WITHIN the 48 hour per week average.

  3. Fred Nath says:

    So IQ’s have dropped dramatically in the Health Select Committee.
    Truth is there is no substitute for experience, certainly in surgery and probably in all the other disciplines.
    Only someone with the IQ of a rabbit could imagine that juniors can get adequate experience in reduced hours for a shorter number of years of training.
    Yes, I’m a dinosaur. Yes, I worked a 1 in 2 nearly all my training. No I didn’t suffer bcause of it – I gained superb exerience in busy jobs for a few years which stood me in good stead later when, as a consultant, the buck stopped with me.
    The Government wants us to have new, shiny, polished young doctors with CST who can’t get jobs so they can start a sub-consultant grade because it is cheaper.
    The idea you should employ consultants to fill gaps is about as sensible as inviting a one-legged man to an a*** kicking party.

Post a Comment

Enter this security code

Submit Comment for Moderation