Hospital Dr News

Charging patients or reducing services the only way to save the NHS without more investment

The only options open to the government on the future of the NHS – if it is not prepared to increase funding – is to start charging patients to use some services, such as a fee to see a doctor, or to reduce services.

That’s the conclusion of a report by the Chartered Institute of Public Finance & Accountancy.

The NHS is unlikely to achieve the £22bn of efficiency savings it has agreed to make by 2020, it says, because it’s unable to react fast enough to the challenges.

CIPFA’s report says making efficiency savings on the scale required, while maintaining service levels, will be impossible. The savings are aimed at plugging the emerging £30bn gap in the NHS’ finances, but such a radical transformation is “not a realistic possibility by 2020”.

Chief executive Rob Whiteman blamed “insufficient will to improve productivity” for the service’s predicament.

CIPFA’s report The Health of Health Finances also warned the savings the NHS had to make might exceed £30bn because of Conservative manifesto pledges such as increasing seven-day working in the NHS.

Pay restraint was also likely to become harder to deliver – even with the 1% cap on annual pay increases issued in last month’s Budget – while the introduction of the National Living Wage would put further pressure on NHS costs.

This would mean that even were the £22bn of savings delivered, the £8bn of additional support from government would still be insufficient to meet the demands placed on the service.

Whiteman said: “The NHS is beset by a Five-Year Forward View and resource assumptions that will not add up.

“System leadership is needed with less short-term promises and more medium-term financial planning.”

He said the NHS could not though solely blame its problems on a lack of resources.

“There is insufficient will to improve productivity, encouraged by the prevailing expectation and culture that more state funding will continue indefinitely,” he said.

“This is simply not sustainable and we urgently need to do away with this approach, plan for the long term and secure greater integration of health and social care services to lessen long term spending pressures and better manage future demand.”

Whiteman also called for debate between politicians and the public about what kind of NHS would be needed in the next 10 to 20 years.

CIPFA urged ministers to protect the £5.3bn Better Care Fund to join up the NHS and social care systems and to support ‘invest to save’ projects to save money on back office services.

The institute’s warning follows calls from Monitor and the NHS Trust Development Authority for trust boards to refocus their attention on financial control. Letters send to trust chairs and chief executives warned that current spending plans were “unaffordable”.

Bookmark and Share

One Response to “Charging patients or reducing services the only way to save the NHS without more investment”

  1. mct.morrison says:

    AT LAST! An ‘independent’ body that has faced reality!

    I wonder if they commented on the reason for the “inssuffient will to improve productivity”? Could this possible be due to the ‘interference’ with clinical care by ‘management’, QANGO’s and politicians? And the constant ‘fear of litigation’?

    Let us hope that the politicians face up to their responsibility and address the ‘only options’ they have. This is a political decision – NOT a medical one.

Post a Comment

Enter this security code

Submit Comment for Moderation