Archive for January, 2012

We can learn from Dr Thomas Barnardo and his ilk

By Tom Goodfellow - 31st January 2012 3:23 pm

The wife and daughter, in response to their post-Downton Abbey withdrawal symptoms, have started watching on Sunday nights the BBC adaptation of Jennifer Worth’s memoirs, Call the Midwife. This is based on her experiences in the East End of London in the 1950’s.

I watched last night’s episode with them, but then wished I hadn’t because of the memories it evoked. It featured Jennie, working as a district nurse, visiting an elderly man who was housebound with leg ulcers and living alone in a tenement flat. He was dirty, smelly and the flat was foul and infested with vermin and insects. The heroine was appropriately disgusted, but her innate goodness allowed her to overcome her middle-class feelings of revulsion and she became his friend.

Television always sanitises things, but the episode brought back the memory of events when I was a medical student at The London Hospital in the late 60’s, admittedly nearly a couple of decades later than the story, so things had started to change.

The first event was a request from a social worker to see if a group of us would volunteer to clean up the flat that belonged to a couple in their fifties. The man had summoned an ambulance to his partner and they found her cold dead in the bed, probably for several days, with a fungating untreated breast cancer. He was lousy with infected ulcers and was taken into hospital for treatment.

The one room they inhabited stank, and even after 40 years the memory of it makes my gorge rise! It was a scene far worse than any horror movie. Their four cats had been removed by the RSPCA, but the floor was covered with cat excreta. Electricity had long since been cut off and we used candles and torches for light. There was utter filth everywhere with greasy unwashed dishes strewn around the room and old rotten food on the table. None of us dared go near the bed which was a festering pile of verminous rags.

It was really a job for environmental health, not a bunch of naïve medical students. We did our best but made little realistic difference to the place. I came away mystified as to how a couple could descend to such utter degradation in the second half of the twentieth century. What had happened in their lives to render them so incapable of either caring for themselves or seeking help from others? What was their story; there would be one? Surely something could have been done to prevent that lady dying in such total darkness and despair?

The second event occurred the same year as some of us were wandering round the derelict areas of Stepney in the East End one warm summer’s evening. We came across an old building with boarded up windows but which had obviously been an institution of some sort. Above the door was engraved the words, “Dr Barnardo’s Home for Children. No Destitute Child Ever Refused Admission”.

Converted to Christianity at the age of 16, Thomas Barnardo believed he had a calling to be a missionary doctor in China. However when he began his studies at my alma mater in 1866 he discovered that his mission was on his own doorstep. The rest is history.

I learned a number of important things that warm summer so long ago. That compassion is more than just sentimentality, it frequently requires rolling up your sleeves and getting very dirty. That to be an empathic doctor requires at least some attempt to understand the complexities and perversities which govern people’s lives. And that one person with vision and commitment can make a difference to lives that seem blighted beyond hope.

These days the press is full of stories about indifferent doctors, uncaring nurses and neglected patients. Sadly many of these stories are true. We, in the modern NHS, would do well to reflect on the life of such people as Dr Barnardo, and many other similar pioneers whose love, faith and commitment helped so many.

Perhaps we will regain our soul!

“Can we afford consultant delivered NHS?”

By Francesca Robinson - 3:08 pm

A review which provides new evidence that a consultant-delivered health service improves the quality of patient care has provoked debate over its affordability and whether the consultant contract is out-of-date.

The report, by the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AMRC), cites over 70 relevant studies and written and oral evidence from professional organisations and individuals on the benefits of a consultant-delivered care throughout the week.

But it warns that to deliver this gold standard the NHS would be unlikely to be able to afford the required increase in consultants.

However, the BMA argues that the UK cannot afford not to provide consultant-delivered care and that everything the AMRC makes a case for could be delivered within the terms of the existing consultant contract.

The report says the key benefits of consultant-delivered care are: rapid and appropriate decision making; improved outcomes for patients; more efficient use of resources; better access for GPs to the opinions of fully trained doctors; improved patient expectation of access to appropriate and skilled clinicians and better training for junior doctors.

But to achieve consultant expansion the NHS has to address the affordability of an increased number of doctors coming through training. Since 1995 the number of consultants has doubled from 18,000 to 36,000 and the number of trainee doctors has risen from 27,000 to 51,000.

If current trends continue there could be an increase of over 60% in the fully trained hospital doctor headcount by 2020. If all eligible doctors become consultants this could raise the consultant pay bill to £6 billion, £2 billion more than the 2010 bill.

The report says that delivering a meaningful consultant-delivered service would require changes to traditional models of service delivery and some “reshaping” and “layering” of consultant careers and working patterns.

It says: “It could be argued that the funding of such consultant expansion is a priority for the country. However, the realities of the current economic climate and, in particular, the financial pressures on the NHS make this unlikely.”

Dr Ian Wilson, deputy chairman of the Consultants Committee, said the report added new evidence to the case for a ‘consultant-present’ service the BMA and many other organisations had been arguing for over many years.

“While some people say we cannot afford a consultant-based service I would argue we can’t afford not to have one - given the consequences of reduced quality, poorer outcomes and increased risks if you don’t have one.”

He pointed out that a shift towards providing more consultant-delivered care had already occurred in some areas of the country and in some specialities such as paediatrics, obstetrics and anaesthetics

“It doesn’t need a new contract. Everything the Academy is arguing for is completely deliverable within the terms and conditions of the existing consultant contract,” said Wilson.

He said a new guide to consultant job planning produced jointly by the BMA and the NHS Employers was now available to give trusts and consultants all the support they needed to deliver change.

“When we work together we can deliver profound and sustainable change. This report adds a huge amount to the debate about a consultant-present service. It is really well thought through and now needs to be properly debated, planned for and paid for,” said Wilson.

Prof Terence Stephenson, AMRC vice-chair, said: “The weight of evidence makes it clear that it can no longer be acceptable for some patients to have to risk poorer outcomes because consultants may not be available at some times of the day or week.

“This will mean changes to the working patterns of consultants but also to how services need to be staffed and configured in a local area to provide safe care.”

Read The benefits of consultant delivered care.

NHS panel defines rules for rationing decisions

GP - 11:25 am

Cataract surgery, knee replacement and other ‘low clinical value’ treatments must only be restricted on the basis of strict evidence-based criteria, an NHS panel has warned.

Inconsistency in access to ‘low clinical value’ treatments leads to postcode lotteries, the Quality, Innovation, Productivity and Prevention Right Care Team said.

Most PCTs now have lists restricting ‘non-urgent’ or ‘low clinical value’ treatments, such as knee replacement and cataract and bariatric surgery.

The Right Care Team was commissioned by NHS medical director Professor Sir Bruce Keogh to determine how the clinical value of such treatments should be decided.

Read more at GP.

Radiologists voice opposition to Health Bill

By Mike Broad - 30th January 2012 9:21 pm

The Royal College of Radiologists has joined the BMA, the Royal College of Nursing and Royal College of Midwives in opposing the passage of the Health and Social Care Bill.

The RCR says the Health Bill does not currently contain a clear duty on health secretary to take direct responsibility for the provision of comprehensive and equitable healthcare for the whole of the population of England.

A statement from the College said: “Recognising that whilst competition has for some time played a role in the NHS, we remain alarmed that the dangers of unfettered competition as outlined in the Bill will adversely affect integrated care in both clinical oncology and clinical radiology.”

It added that there is “great risk of widespread, and potentially embedded, health inequalities across the NHS”.

Meanwhile, a YouGov poll this week finds that 78% of 1,600 medical professionals believe the Health Bill plans will exclude more people from healthcare.

Seven out of ten think it will lead to patient charges for basic services such as ambulance, cancer screening and maternity care.

Commenting on the survey, Dr Helena McKeown, a GP from Wiltshire, said: “This poll shows what anyone who works in the NHS has known for months - Lansley’s plans are a disaster for patients. 84% have no confidence that the right balance between competition and collaboration will be struck as Lansley claims, so it’s no surprise that only 13% of NHS staff surveyed think he’s doing a good job - he’s not.”

The hardening in opposition follows the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges’ (AMRC) eleventh hour about face on publicly opposing the Health Bill. Behind the scenes ministers accused the colleges of becoming too political, and the Royal College of Surgeons maintained its support for the Bill.

The RCR statement adds: “Clinical radiology has already seen the negative impact of outsourcing on integration. Procuring radiology services from different sources would have a hugely detrimental impact on integration adding costs to the NHS overall.

“In a tertiary specialty such as clinical oncology, fragmentation will impact negatively on the capacity to deliver coherent care locally. It will also undo the excellent national co-ordinated patterns of care achieved through the cancer agenda. The capacity to deliver the right care in the right place to the right patient would be seriously undermined.”

The developments follow a series of high level talks last week including a parliamentary meeting of the royal colleges and others chaired by Lord Owen, and another between the BMA, the Royal College of Nursing and the AMRC.

“Health Bill fight mirrors Bevan’s bid to start NHS”

GP - 11:13 am

Health secretary Andrew Lansley has compared his bid to force through NHS reforms in the face of growing opposition to Aneurin Bevan’s efforts to establish the NHS in 1948.

His comments drew a furious response from BMA chairman Dr Hamish Meldrum, who hit out at Mr Lansley’s “inflammatory remarks” and urged him to listen to warnings about the NHS reforms.

In a speech on Thursday, Mr Lansley rejected calls for the Health Bill to be withdrawn. He said: “Look back to 1948 when the BMA denounced Aneurin Bevan as ‘a would-be Führer’ for wanting them to join a national health service. And Bevan himself described the BMA as ‘politically poisoned people’.

“A survey at the time showed only 10% of doctors backed the plans. But where we would be today if my predecessors had caved in?”

Read more in GP.

Private healthcare providers feeling the pinch

By Mike Broad - 10:46 am

The private acute healthcare industry is facing contraction despite the potential for NHS work increasing, according to analysis.

Laing & Buisson’s Healthcare Market Review shows that revenues generated by independent hospitals providing medical treatments in 2010 were flat at £3.84bn.

The main funding source for independently run hospitals is patients with private medical cover. However, the proportion of business accounted for by this audience has slipped consistently over the past five years, accounting for just 59% (£2.3bn) of revenues generated in 2010 - compared to 65% in 2005.

NHS patients using private facilities now account for a quarter of hospital income (compared to 14% in 2005) generating £957m. Latest analysis, though, suggests that this source - which has bolstered market fortunes in recent years - may be reaching a cyclical high.

Pay-as-you-go patients provided 14% of revenues (£534m) for independent medical hospitals, up by 0.5%. Other sources contribute the remaining 2.5% (£104m).

In addition to static income, the report suggests that competition is increasing. It reported a record 515 independent medical hospitals at mid 2011, compared with 454 in mid-2010. Of these, 211 offer 9,545 inpatient beds and 304 provide only day surgery. In addition, 73 private patient units within NHS hospitals also compete for a slice of the private healthcare market.

Co-author Philip Blackburn said: “There are certainly near term challenges for service providers of private acute healthcare under current market conditions, but also opportunities in the longer term.

“Delivery efficiencies from providers are being solicited, not least from medical insurers, which are seeking savings to pass on to their customers, and the recent OFT report, which found evidence of potential competition limiters in the provision of private healthcare by hospitals and consultants.”

The report also says that with the government’s proposed increase in the private patient income cap to 49% for the NHS, independent hospitals will also face competing interest from this area, though there is certainly limited scope for increased private healthcare capacity at this time.

The independent acute sector is estimated to have treated around 425,000 NHS (overnight and day case) patients in 2010. Centrally procured ISTC activity decreased only marginally in the year to £357m (2009: £365m) with Care UK, Circle and UK Specialist Hospitals the largest scheme providers during 2010, accounting for 35%, 18% and 16% respectively of the total centrally procured services.

During the period 15 schemes came to the end of their initial contracts, while two new large scale facilities carried out their first full year of activity. Revenues from centrally procured schemes are expected to dip more significantly in 2011 as a further 13 schemes are due to expire.

Just what the NHS (and I) need - a bit of privatisation

By Jerry Nelson - 29th January 2012 10:39 am

Five-a-day, my arse

The secret to healthy eating? Colour-coding the unhealthy stuff and moving it out of the patient/shopper’s eyeline, according to new ‘research’ from the tofu-scoffing food police. Mind you, this was in America where they do have a glut of simple-minded lardarses to cope with, and I suppose you can just imagine that some of them might fall for such an obvious ploy. Well, shame on you, fat Yanks! It would take more than a red sticker  and a place on the bottom shelf of the chill cabinet to stop me going for the bacon and sausage sandwich with extra lard and a nice big bag of crisps. And I suspect that if the researchers go back in a couple of weeks, they will find that even our slow-witted transatlantic cousins have discovered where they’ve hidden the stuff that actually tastes nice. Bariatric surgery, that’s the answer. Private bariatric surgery. And I know a man who can help…

Surgeons stick it to the hand-wringers

And talking of private surgery, well done the Royal College of Surgeons - seven words I never expected to hear myself saying. It’s almost worth the subscription fee. I see the boys from Lincoln’s Inn Fields have refused to line up with the other namby-pamby royal colleges to oppose the Tory’s NHS reforms, and quite right, too. Just what the NHS needs, a bit of privatisation and fresh thinking. Best of all, we get to stuff the NHS beds with fee-paying punters instead of blocking them with incontinent grannies. I might have to give some serious thought to my standing with the GMC - this journalism lark’s all very well, but if the Middle Bit of England Trust is going to turn into a gold mine, I don’t want all the cash going into the pockets of my erstwhile colleagues. Especially not that Beardy-sandal compost-face Johnson waster.

Three-in-a-test tube romp shocker

Three-parent IVF - what’s all that about then? Do they have three test tubes? What goes into them? Doesn’t sound half as much fun as doing it the old-fashioned, sticky way. Still, whatever the mechanics of the proccess, it sounds as if it will get right up the noses of the Catholics and the happy-clappers, in which case it can’t be all bad.

Hooray for natural selection!

Apparently the recession has caused 2,000 heart attack deaths in London. The story seems to suggest that this is a bad thing, but I’m not so sure. Although a few might have been bankers - the sort of chap you wouldn’t mind drinking with or getting insider financial tips from - most of them will have been poor people who can’t afford to go private, and who waste their GP’s time with constant complaints about feeling tired and unhappy. Darwinism in action, and I’m all for it. Now we just need some sort of metropolitan plague to selectively wipe out that bunch of crusties camping outside St Paul’s, who keep denying me unimpeded access to my place of worship (no, don’t panic - I’m referring to the Snail & Cabbage on the Ludgate Circus).

“Health Bill opposition not representative of GPs”

By Mike Broad - 10:19 am

In a letter to the Telegraph, a group of GPs challenged the growing perception that all doctors are opposed to the Health and Social Care Bill which is set to become law. A recent Royal College of GPs survey suggested the overwhelming majority of GPs were opposed to the government’s reforms:

Dear Sir,

The NHS faces a challenging few years. Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) are already showing their ability to innovate and improve the care of patients despite difficult circumstances.

Blanket opposition to the NHS reforms by the British Medical Association and the Royal College of Nurses is not representative of the views of GPs who, like us, already lead CCGs, and the large number of GPs and nurses who support us. In many parts of England, CCGs are already showing effective leadership in their local health systems. This brings frontline clinical experience and the views of local people into the heart of the NHS.

Co-operation between hospitals, social services, GPs and community nurses is much stronger as a result – this can only benefit people who rely on these services.

The risks of derailing the development of clinical commissioning must not be underestimated. Previous health service reforms have failed to commit to clinical leadership and have paid the price of disengaging the frontline staff most needed to modernise the NHS. We cannot allow that to happen this time. Without strong clinical leadership and the coordinated efforts of local clinicians, the NHS itself may be in peril: local services can only be improved if we all pull together.

Yours sincerely,

Dr Shane Gordon

GP and CEO, North East Essex CCG

Dr Jonathan Marshall

Chairman, United Commissioning Group

Dr Amit Bhargava

Crawley CCG

Dr Dilip Acquilla

Vice-chairman, Easton CCG

Dr Shane Gordon

GP & CEO North East Essex CCG

Dr Jonathan Marshall

Chair, United Commissioning Group

Dr Tony Ainsworth

Chairman, Northeast Birmingham CCG

Dr A Ali

Vice-Chairman, Barnsley Peoples First Commissioning Consortium LLP

Dr Ken Aswani

GP/Medical Director, Waltham Forest Federated GP Consortium

Dr Nick Balac

Chairman, Barnsley Peoples First Commissioning Consortium LLP

Dr Barhey

Chairman, Luton CCG

Dr Sam Barrell

Clinical Director, Commissioning & Transition TCT

Chairman, Baywide CCG Ltd

Dr Kamal Bishai

West Essex CCG Board, Epping Forest Locality Lead

George Boulos

Deputy Lead, North & West Reading CCG

David Eyre-Brook

Chairman, Guildford and Waverley CCG

Charles Broomhead

Contract Lead, Northeast Birmingham CCG (NEB)

Dr Harry Byrne

Chairman, Darlington CCG

Mr Joseph Chandy

Chairman, Easington Locality Group, Durham Dales, Easington, Sedgefield Shadow CCG

Dr Jonathan Cockbain

Joint Chairman of Sutton CCG

Dr Rosemary Croft

Member of the management Exec, GP South Reading Consortium

Ms Jane Dempster

Clinical Lead, Farnham CCG

Dr Stewart Findlay

GP Chair, Durham Dales, Easington and Sedgefield CCG

Dr Colin Fleetcroft

Founder member of Guildford and Waverley CCG

Dr Annet Gamell

Chairman, Bucks Primary Care Collaborative

Dr Andy Harris

Chairman, Leeds South & East CCG

Dr John Havard

Board Member, Ipswich & East Suffolk CCG

Dr Mark Hayes

Shadow Clinical Accountable Officer, Vale of York CCG

Mr Ken Holton

Information & Data Lead, InSpires & Godiva CCGs (part of Arden Consortia)

Dr Derek Hooper

Chairman, NE Lincs Care Trust CCG Council

Dr Mark Jefford

Clinical Lead, Newark & Sherwood NHS CCG

Dr Elizabeth Johnston

Chairman, South Reading CCG

Dr Andrea Jones

GP/Associate Clinical Lead, Darlington CCG

Dr Mahesh Kamdar

Clinical Co-Chair, Castle Point CCG

Dr David Kelly

Chairman, North Kirklees Health Alliance

Dr Stephen Madgwick

Clinical Lead, Wokingham CCG

Dr Joanne Medhurst

Managing Director, Bexley BSU

Dr Joe McGilligan

Chairman, EsyDoc LLP

Dr Vaishali Nanda

Vice-chairman, Middlesborough CCG

Dr Steve Ollerton

Chairman, Greater Huddersfield CCG

Dr Ramila Patel

Chairman, South Birmingham Independent Commissioners

Dr Amal Paul

Chairman, Leeds Alliance CCG

Dr Boleslaw Posmyk

Chairman, Hartlepool Locality & Hartlepool & North Tees CCG

Ms Stephanie Poulter

Business Manager, Northeast Birmingham CCG

Mrs Jan Randall

Commissioning Manager, NHS Kirklees

Dr Hugh Reeve

Chairman, Cumbria CCG

Dr Stephen Richards

Consortium Lead, Oxfordshire CCG

Dr John Ribchester

Board Member, Canterbury & Coastal CCG

Dr John Rivers

Chairman, Isle of Wight CCG

Dr Dinah Roy

Chairman, Sedgefield Locality, Durham Dales, Sedgefield & Easington Shadow CCG

Dr Raian Sheikh

Clinical Lead, Mansfield & Ashfield CCG

Dr Gordon Sinclair

Chairman, Leeds West Commissioning Group

Dr Ramji Sinha

Deputy Chairman, Trans Walsall Independent Commissioners

Dr Rod Smith

Chairman, North & West Reading CCG

Dr Mark Spencer

GP/Chairman, Fleetwood CCG

Dr Koyih Tan

Clinical Lead & Chair, Fareham & Gosport CCG

Dr Helen Thomas

Associate Medical Director NHS Devon, SHA GP Lead South West

Board Member, Plymouth CCG

Dr Peter Wilczynski

Interim executive chair, Corby Healthcare CCG

Dr Martin Writer

GP Chair & GP Principal, Coastal Community Healthcare Consortium CCG

GMC to review private health perk for employees

Pulse - 27th January 2012 8:16 pm

The GMC is to review its controversial policy of offering staff private medical insurance this year, as the regulator seeks ‘efficiency gains’ that would allow it to offer further cuts to GP fees in 2013 and 2014.

The GMC’s resources committee is to look specifically at the GMC’s policy of offering full-time staff private medical insurance in 2012, after an outcry from GPs over the £280,000 spent on the staff perk.

Alongside routine reviews of staff pay and other benefits such as maternity cover, the GMC said it is looking for ‘further efficiency gains’ that would allow it to make further reductions in its fees.

Read more at Pulse.

Doctor only forced to pay a fraction of huge legal bills

This is Staffordshire - 3:32 pm

A surgeon has been told to pay just £20,000 of a legal bill of more than £350,000 run up by two hospitals.

The order was made against paediatric surgeon Shiban Ahmed, who had been taken to an employment tribunal by the University Hospital of North Staffordshire and Alder Hay Hospital, in Liverpool, in a bid to recover the costs.

Most of the £350,000 was built up as the trusts prepared to defend a case of discrimination he was bringing against them.

The consultant had made 101 allegations in two-and-a-half years, accusing managers of targeting him for his race, religion and beliefs and for blowing the whistle on standards.

Read more at This is Staffordshire.