Archive for December, 2011

New phone hotline for NHS whistleblowers

By Mike Broad - 30th December 2011 11:58 am

NHS and social care staff who have concerns about patient care will be able to access a new, free whistleblowing helpline from the 1 January, the health secretary has said.

The government-funded helpline will be available to staff and employers in the social care sector, as well as the NHS, via a now-free phone service.

This is in addition to the introduction of a contractual duty to raise concerns, which will be enshrined in the new NHS Constitution.

The new helpline number will be 08000 724 725. Provided by the Royal Mencap Society, the service will operate weekdays between 08.00-18.00, and an out of hours answering service will be available weekends and public holidays.

Andrew Lansley said: “Staff on the frontline know when patient services need to improve. That’s why staff who blow the whistle are crucial in helping to raise standards, and we’re determined to support them.

“Making it easier for staff to challenge the institutional power of organisations is a key factor in preventing, identifying and tackling pockets of culturally poor practice. That’s why we’ve created a helpline service for concerned staff…this will play an important role in creating a culture where staff will be able to raise genuine concerns in good faith, without fear of reprisal.”

But whistleblowers’ lobby group Patients First said the government shouldn’t be looking for an external solution and should ensure that the internal whistleblowing processes already in existence within NHS trusts should be made to work.

A similar web-based whistleblowing service is also being developed, with further details to be announced in due course.

Labour says rise in social care fees a stealth tax

BBC Health - 11:05 am

There has been a sharp rise in the cost of council services for elderly and disabled people, Labour has warned.

Data from 93 out of 153 councils in England showed fees for meals on wheels has gone up by 13% over the last two years, while transport rose by 33%.

The survey also found huge regional variations in the charges, which Labour says have become a stealth tax.

The government said local authorities were responsible for non-residential care and changes should be affordable.

Cross-party talks on the future funding of care are to begin in the new year.

Read more at BBC Health.

Record number of patients contract HAIs in the NHS

Telegraph - 29th December 2011 12:48 pm

The number of patients who contracted life-threatening infections in NHS hospitals has almost doubled in two years to a record level, official figures have shown.

Recorded cases of patients with a ‘nosocomial condition’ - any infection acquired in hospital or a medical environment - also rose by more than a third last year compared with the year before.

A large proportion of the patients involved were aged over 75, the figures from the NHS Information Centre show. Illnesses related to such infections led to average stays in hospital last year of 31.1 days.

Experts blamed poor hygiene for the dramatic rise in infections, including superbugs MRSA and Clostridium difficile (C. diff) as well as norovirus and E.coli.

But the Department of Health dismissed the “misleading” figures, published online, saying that officials have “got better and better at tackling hospital infections”.

Read more in The Telegraph.

Continued attacks on doctors will damage the NHS

By Dr Brian Keighley, chairman of the BMA in Scotland - 12:31 pm

It is disappointing that over the course of the year, doctors have come under repeated attack on several fronts.

Their contracts are being devalued and undermined by NHS employers and now politicians are attacking the NHS pension scheme. It would appear that our political leaders perceive these to be the solution to the country’s national deficit. While this approach might deliver some savings in the short term, it will, in the longer term cause damage to patient care and the loss of doctors from the NHS as many may choose to retire early.

The NHS is nothing without its staff and right now with pending budget cuts, pressure on boards to make further savings, and staff cuts on hospital wards, doctors have less time to spend with patients and their goodwill is being pushed to breaking point.

Next year will see us surveying our members on the proposals for reform of the NHS pension scheme, and we have not ruled out a ballot for industrial action. Politicians should be wary of underestimating the strength of feeling amongst all members of the NHS pension scheme and listen to our concerns.

Maintaining a sustainable and high quality NHS in the current financial climate will require an open and informed dialogue about the true cost of delivering health services and the priorities for the allocation of NHS resources. Doctors working on the ground in both primary and secondary care are ideally placed to help the NHS provide the services that patients need. They are experts in delivering those services and must be engaged with both nationally and locally in making key decisions on where efficiencies can be made with the least impact to quality of care and patient safety.

Public Health

We in Scotland have always been progressive in tackling our public health challenges. Scotland led the way in tackling the blight of smoking on society by banning smoking in public places. The benefits of that legislation are clear for all to see.

Alcohol misuse is costing Scotland an estimated £3.6 billion a year. The cost of cheap drink is £900 for every adult in Scotland. If our politicians are serious about helping to change our Scots culture of heavy drinking, then they must support the government’s minimum pricing bill.

Sensible drinking begins with sensible pricing and I hope that minimum pricing will begin the cultural change we need to reduce the alcohol misuse epidemic in Scotland.

Salient - if depressing views - of the NHS challenges in 2012

By Mike Broad - 12:24 pm

It’s that time of year when the great and good send out their New Year messages i.e. there’s not a lot of news around in late December and there’s a good chance that a punchy opinion could make the headlines.

This is exactly what Mike Farrar achieved this week. Mike who? You know, the head honcho of employers’ organisation the NHS Confederation.

He says political and healthcare leaders must in 2012 persuade public to let go of “hospital-or-bust” model of care and failure to do so could lead to a potential loss of confidence in the NHS.

Setting out his top issues for 2012, Farrar says resources must shift into community-based services, early intervention and self-care.

NHS leaders believe that at least 25% of patients in hospital beds could be looked after by NHS staff at home, Farrar says. Political and NHS leaders need to be “honest about the issues, bold about the solutions and decisive in taking action”.

They must offer the public a compelling vision of how services can be better after the changes. They must avoid the traps of focussing exclusively on the closure of some hospital services and failing to explain how the public would benefit overall.

The NHS is already trying to make £20 billon worth of efficiencies by 2015 in order to cope with a flat budget and rising demand. But Farrar says the economic backdrop suggests that the age of austerity will now go on even longer, making the task more urgent.

He says: “We have had a lot of talk about changing services but 2012 must be the year we convert talk into action.  It feels like the focus is on everything but the thing that would make most difference.

“Hospitals play a vital role, but we do rely on them for some services that could be provided elsewhere. We should be concentrating on reducing hospital stays where this is right for patients, shifting resources into community services, raising standards of general practice, and promoting early intervention and self care. There is a value-for-money argument for doing this, but it not just about money and the public need to be told that. This is about building an NHS for the future.

“Care would be better for frail patients who would have fewer crises, shorter hospital stays when they need them, and more time in the comfort and safety of their homes. There would be opportunities to improve safety through consolidation of specialist services. There would be major potential to deliver better value for money and keep the NHS on a sustainable footing. We all know that quality of care will fall victim to a financial crisis.”

Mr Farrar identifies four factors that would help bring about change:

1. Strong political leadership - politicians have failed to support the NHS even when the case for change has been clear.

2. Strong clinical leadership - the voice of clinicians will be more powerful than ever under the new system but they must not be set up to fail through lack of support.

3. Changing how health services are paid for - perverse incentives often mean it may not make financial sense to provide care out of hospital even though this may be best for patients.

4. Listening to the public - NHS must always listen and be prepared to change course when it is getting something wrong.

The task of shifting public and political opinion on change is one of five key challenges for the NHS that Farrar identifies for 2012. The others are:

- Coping with unprecedented financial pressures

- Addressing concerns about the quality of care, particularly the dignity of care of older patients and the monitoring of safety

- Implementing government reforms to NHS structures, minimising distraction and loss of momentum

- Resolving the long-term funding of social care, with a failure to tackle this issue having a major impact on patients and NHS services.

Farrar says: “The NHS absolutely must rise to these challenges. Those doing the day job however face major pressures in trying to keep the NHS’s head above water. They will be trying to stop waiting times getting out of control. They will be focusing on making all the new structures work as a result of NHS reform. There is a real danger of distraction.

“We must not allow that to happen if we want 2012 to be a success.”

The other New Year’s address which caught the eye was that of Dr Brian Keighley, chairman of the BMA in Scotland, who warned that continued attacks on the medical workforce’s terms and conditions, could risk ‘compassion fatigue’ amongst NHS professionals and lead to the long term damage of the NHS.

He said that politicians should not seek to blame doctors as part of the problem but instead “look to us as part of the solution” and urged them to work more closely with doctors to identify ways to overcome the financial challenges facing the NHS in the year to come.

“It is disappointing that over the course of the year, doctors have come under repeated attack on several fronts. Their contracts are being devalued and undermined by NHS employers and now politicians are attacking the NHS pension scheme. It would appear that our political leaders perceive these to be the solution to the country’s national deficit.

“While this approach might deliver some savings in the short term, it will, in the longer term cause damage to patient care and the loss of doctors from the NHS as many may choose to retire early.  The NHS is nothing without its staff and right now with pending budget cuts, pressure on boards to make further savings, and staff cuts on hospital wards, doctors have less time to spend with patients and their goodwill is being pushed to breaking point.”

Amen to that. Neither are the most uplifting New Year messages ever, but both set the current challenges in context.

“Let go of outdated hospital-or-bust care”

By Mike Broad - 11:54 am

Political and healthcare leaders must persuade the public to let go of the outdated “hospital-or-bust” model of care in 2012, the NHS Confederation chief executive has claimed.

In setting out the big challenges for the year ahead, Mike Farrar warns of a potential loss of confidence in the NHS unless political and healthcare leaders make a compelling case to the public for changes to the delivery of services.

He believes that at least one in four patients would be better off being cared for out of hospital and resources must be shifted into community-based services, early intervention and self care.

Farrar calls on political and NHS leaders need to be “honest about the issues, bold about the solutions and decisive in taking action”.

They must offer the public a compelling vision of how services can be better after the changes. They must avoid the traps of focussing exclusively on the closure of some hospital services and failing to explain how the public would benefit overall, he says.

The NHS is already trying to make £20 billon worth of efficiencies by 2015 in order to cope with a flat budget and rising demand. But Farrar says the economic backdrop suggests that the age of austerity will now go on even longer, making the task more urgent.

He said: “We have had a lot of talk about changing services but 2012 must be the year we convert talk into action. It feels like the focus is on everything but the thing that would make most difference.

“Hospitals play a vital role, but we do rely on them for some services that could be provided elsewhere. We should be concentrating on reducing hospital stays where this is right for patients, shifting resources into community services, raising standards of general practice, and promoting early intervention and self-care. There is a value-for-money argument for doing this, but it not just about money and the public need to be told that. This is about building an NHS for the future.”

He identifies four factors that would help bring about change: strong political leadership - politicians have failed to support the NHS even when the case for change has been clear; strong clinical leadership - the voice of clinicians will be more powerful than ever under the new system but they must not be set up to fail through lack of support; changing how health services are paid for -perverse incentives often mean it may not make financial sense to provide care out of hospital even though this may be best for patients; and, listening to the public  - NHS must always listen and be prepared to change course when it is getting something wrong.

Tax: Are you sitting on a retirement timebomb?

By Justine Roberts - 28th December 2011 12:49 pm

This year we will see an unprecedented attack on the pension provision of higher earners. With the government putting in place austerity measures the NHS pension scheme is directly in the firing line only four years after it was last changed. As individuals there is little we can do to influence government policy however there is another even more pressing issue estimated to affect at least 100,000 and possibly up to 500,000 higher earners retiring over the next few years that you can plan for.

Currently anyone retiring in the current tax year can accrue pension benefits equivalent to £1.8million. This figure is calculated as the current value of any personal pension with the NHS being valued as the annual pension entitlement multiplied by 20 with tax free cash entitlement added.

From April 2012 this current pension allowance is reducing to £1.5million. The government has announced it will remain at this level at least for the lifetime of the current parliament, after the 2015/16 tax years there is no indication of what is likely to happen however with the expectation of a continued financial squeeze there may be little appetite amongst politicians or the general public to increase pension tax benefits for high earners.

While this allowance may still seem generous, any doctor retiring with an NHS pension of £50,000 will have utilised £1.15million of the allowance leaving scope for £350,000 of private pension arrangements. Increase the NHS pension to £60,000 and the level of permissible private pension fund reduces to £120,000. NHS pension increases have been significant in the last few years and coupled with private arrangements means that a significant number will breach the new limit. Some consultants are losing their enhanced protection as many have breached the terms of the agreement due to these increases over the past few years.

If allowances are exceeded the penalties are harsh. Pension accrued above the allowance is returned either as a lump sum or as a pension. If returned as a lump sum it is subject to a 55% tax penalty, if taken as income there is an immediate penalty of 25% plus taxation at marginal rate making a tax rate of up to 75%. This change means anyone planning their retirement around the higher allowance of £1.8million is now sitting on a tax penalty of up to £165,000.

There are a number of things that can be done in order to mitigate these penalties but time is short. Firstly it is possible to seek from the revenue a protected allowance. This is called fixed protection and preserves the individual’s higher allowance of £1.8million. The significant downside to this is that in order for the protection to remain valid it is necessary to cease all contributions to pensions including the NHS scheme. Leaving the NHS pension scheme is a significant step and I would strongly urge taking professional advice prior to making this decision. The nomination for fixed protection must take place before April 2012.

A more drastic measure is to draw retirement benefits before the new limits apply in April. This may not be practical due to the timescale; however it is possible to draw retirement benefits without ceasing work.

It makes sense to review private pension contributions being made if likely to be close to the lifetime allowance, as the tax penalties for exceeding the limits are significantly greater than the reliefs received for making the contributions. It also makes little sense investing in high risk pension funds if the outcome is pension growth that will be heavily taxed when benefits are taken.

The reduced lifetime allowance has the most immediate impact upon those retiring within the next three years. However, with uncertainty over how much - if at all - allowances will rise in years to come, more and more doctors will find themselves breaching this limit especially those with high NHS incomes.

It is always sensible to review pension arrangements and with legislative changes affecting the NHS pension and market forces playing havoc with private arrangements, it is more important than ever to ensure retirement planning is appropriate.

Justine Roberts is a director of Medical & Financial Ltd who are an Independent Financial Consultancy Service, specialising with doctors and dentists. She has over 12 years experience working with the medical community providing pension, investment and general financial planning advice. For further information email Justine on justine@medicalandfinancial.com

CEA review decision anticipated in New Year

By Mike Broad - 12:13 pm

The government will make an announcement on the continuance or otherwise of the national Clinical Excellence Awards scheme “as early as possible” in 2012.

The body which administers the scheme - the ACCEA - has been informed by ministers that there will definitely be a renewals round, but uncertainty still shrouds the local and national schemes.

If the announcement is positive in the New Year, the ACCEA will open the round soon afterwards and will ensure that the application process remains open for eight working weeks.

CEAs, which are awarded to doctors who work above and beyond their contractual commitments, have been under review since August 2010 and have been subject to a series of un-negotiated cuts.

The pay review body reported on the future of the scheme to ministers some time ago, but the government has yet to announce what will happen to the doctors’ reward scheme.

In 2011, the number of national awards was limited to 300 for the second year running in an attempt to cut costs. In 2009, 601 national awards were made to doctors in England and Wales.

Furthermore, the ratio used to calculate the minimum level of investment for employer-based awards was reduced in 2011 from 0.35 to 0.2 per eligible consultant, making it much harder to secure a local CEA.

Mark Porter, chair of the BMA’s consultants committee, said: “The government has seriously delayed confirmation on the 2012 round of CEAs. However, we have pressed strongly for the round to go ahead in order to recognise appropriately the contribution of consultants to excellence in care and expect the round to be delayed rather than cancelled.

“We have also worked with employers both locally and nationally and in most trusts the Local Negotiating Committees have secured agreement to mount the 2012 employer-based awards round.”

The ACCEA is urging doctors to continue accessing their website to keep up-to-date.

The BMA Northern Ireland consultants committee recently informed health, social services and public safety minister Edwin Poots that it will seek leave for a judicial review into suspension of CEAs in Northern Ireland.

The BMA’s Dr Steven Austin said the decision to suspend CEAs in Northern Ireland while they continued in England and Wales would have an adverse impact on service delivery and deter people from working there.

However, the BMA confirmed that there would be no legal action in England and Wales “at present”.

Read more on the value of CEAs.

Leadership vacuum threatens care in London

By Mike Broad - 9:59 am

Health services in London will be operating in a leadership vacuum following the abolition of strategic health authorities by April 2013, a report claims.

Successive reviews of healthcare in London have highlighted the poor health of the population in some areas, variations in the quality of primary care, and inappropriate configuration of hospital services.

The King’s Fund study said the most recent by Lord Ara Darzi started the process of restructuring London’s services only for the coalition government to halt the reforms.

Many of the historical problems remain and report questions who will take a lead in improving health and health care in London with the dismantling of SHAs.

There needs to be much greater clarity of roles and responsibilities within the reformed NHS structure within London to avoid ambiguity and confusion, it says.

The report suggests the particular challenges for London include a worsening in the capital’s financial situation with both providers and commissioners forecasting deficits greater than those in other parts of the country.

Furthermore, very few of the trusts that should be aiming to achieve foundation status by 2014 are likely to be financially viable by that date.

Variations in the quality of both primary and secondary care persist, it says: patients report poor quality care in general practice; health inequalities need to be addressed; reconfiguration of hospital services is needed to save lives.

In the absence of a strategic health authority, there is considerable uncertainty about who will make the difficult decisions about issues that affect the whole of London.

Improving health and health care in London presents an overview of the current financial position and the distribution of activity and resources around the various sectors of London. It assesses the likely impact of the new government’s NHS reforms and concludes with some suggestions of ways to facilitate appropriate service change, improve the quality of care, and improve the health and health outcomes of Londoners.

The report recommends that hospital services are reorganised, with emergency care concentrated in fewer hospitals.

Chris Ham, chief executive of The King’s Fund, said: “London’s NHS is in urgent need of change, but the risk is no-one will be in the driving seat to push through the changes needed to improve patient care. New pan-London health organisations are emerging, but none has a clear mandate to take the lead. Strategic leadership is important across the NHS, but in London it is particularly important as the challenges are more acute and urgent.”

A combination of perspectives is needed to drive forward the required changes, which brings together the NHS Commissioning Board, clinical commissioning groups, health and wellbeing boards and health care providers. But the report warns that this will fail unless it is clear who is responsible for overall pan-London leadership and co-ordination.

Read the report.

Up to 50% private patients in English NHS hospitals

BBC Health - 9:23 am

NHS hospitals in England will be free to use almost half their hospital beds and theatre time for private patients under government plans.

A recent revision to the ongoing health bill will allow foundation hospitals to raise 49% of funds through non-NHS work if the bill gets through Parliament.

Most foundation trusts are now limited to a private income of about 2%.

The health secretary says the move will benefit NHS patients but Labour claimed it could lead to longer waiting lists.

Read more at BBC Health.