Archive for June, 2011

Doctor barred from flying after refusing body scan

Telegraph - 30th June 2011 4:51 pm

Tony Aguirre an eye specialist at Huddersfield Royal Infirmary declined to go through the full-body scanner on both medical and ethical grounds.

But instead of being offered a pat down search as an alternative, the father-of-two was escorted out of the airport by police and not allowed to board his flight to Zurich.

It is now mandatory for passengers to go through the full body scanners before boarding their flights at Manchester, Gatwick and Heathrow airports staff there have been told that anyone who refuses should be grounded.

The X-ray device scans through a person’s clothes creating an image of a person’s naked body in order to look for hidden objects potentially hidden on their person.

But Mr Aguirre said he was not prepared to take the risk of going through the scanner as it was potentially dangerous to his health. He also said it was undignified to expose his nude body.

“X-rays are known to cause cancer and I think somebody will get cancer from this body scanner whether its me or someone else,” said Mr Aguirre.

“It is well known that X-rays can cause cancer. It can cause mutations in the genes in the spermatogenetic cells, as in most other cells.”

Read more in the Telegraph.

Major investigation into care at London NHS trust

BBC Health - 2:54 pm

The Care Quality Commission has started a full investigation - only the second time it has done so - into the Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust.

In April, it was told to improve its maternity services but the CQC said not enough has been done. The trust said it welcomed the inquiry.

In April 2010, the CQC imposed eight conditions on the trust - seven of which have now been lifted - due to concerns about its performance.

Since then, inspectors have made unannounced visits, resulting in urgent demands for improvement and have carried out reviews into the maternity and A&E services.

The review of A&E, which will be published next month, found that problems with how the department was organised was affecting care.

Read more at BBC Health.

Juniors better off investing in a private pension

By Mike Broad - 2:36 pm

Many junior doctors could be better off investing in a private pension than joining the reformed NHS scheme, new figures reveal.

Initial figures from illustrative modelling, commissioned by the BMA, show that the potential pension a doctor embarking on a career as a GP could expect to build up in the NHS scheme - assuming it undergoes key reforms proposed by the government - could be lower than the pension built up by investing in a personal scheme with no employer contributions.

Proposals to increase the retirement age could also have a dramatic impact. A junior doctor currently aged 30 could expect to work to the age of 68 rather than 60. Over the course of the additional eight years worked, they could expect to pay more than £140,000 in contributions.

It has prompted the BMA to repeat its call for talks with the government on pensions. Delegates at the BMA’s annual representatives conference in Cardiff passed a motion calling for a possible ballot on industrial action over pension reform.

Following the annual meeting, BMA leaders are reported as having agreed with 16 other unions representing healthcare workers to plead a special case for the NHS Pension Scheme, with the threat of combined industrial action if ministers refuse to back down.

Doctors are set to be balloted on what could become co-ordinated, NHS-wide industrial action against the government’s pension reforms.

The BMA is concerned that if the NHS pension ceases to provide value to doctors, many would opt out, potentially destabilising the largest public sector pension scheme, and adding to the burden on the state.

In a speech to the conference, Dr Andrew Dearden, chairman of the BMA pensions committee, called on the government to “stop throwing punches” and enter into dialogue. Dearden emphasised that many of the changes proposed by the government for public sector pensions have already been applied to the NHS scheme, which is currently in surplus.

He said: “There is great anger and fear among doctors and medical students. And rightly so, when you consider that the NHS pension scheme is in a very different position from other public sector schemes. It went through a major overhaul only three years ago. And for all the talk of it not being affordable to the taxpayer, it is currently delivering a massive surplus of £2 billion per year to the Treasury.

“In 2008, we agreed to work longer and pay more. Our message to the government is simple - we want to be treated fairly and have a reasonable dialogue on pensions - something that has been sadly lacking so far. The government wants you to work longer, pay more and get a lot less. This is no way to treat the very doctors who have devoted their entire careers to patients and the NHS.”

The government recently said it would adopt the recommendations of the Hutton Review on public pensions, which suggested that the retirement age should be raised and pensions based on career average earnings - rather than final salary - should be introduced.

Read a blog on the issue.

Climate is ripe for a perfect storm in the NHS

By Stephen Campion - 29th June 2011 10:14 am

In our response to the NHS ‘listening exercise’, the HCSA warned that the climate is ripe for a perfect storm.

It is all very well reforming the NHS - most commentators agree that reform is necessary - but even the most ardent supporter of the government’s plans must surely see that today’s problems must take priority over tomorrow’s NHS.

Like the tragedy in Staffordshire, the NHS is in real danger of losing sight of the ball. The experiences reported about the financial crisis in Leicester are not unique.

Many trusts are openly saying that they can’t pay the bills and are resorting to draconian measures to balance the books. At the same time NHS staff remain under a pay freeze, redundancies are becoming the norm and staff are being asked to accept higher pension contributions in return for a lower pension income. Morale is low; and goodwill rapidly destroyed as the NHS is forced to manage a financial crisis not of the staff’s making.

Where does patient care stand in this mess? Many treatments are being put on hold or restricted. Care of the elderly is regularly reported as being sub-standard. Waiting times are lengthening; tensions within the NHS increasing.

Reform can only be built upon a solid platform and I fear that the sinking sands will inevitably lead to structural collapse. Raiding surplus pension funds to bail out the business is Maxwellian, dangerous and ill-conceived. How often are we told: “Staff are the greatest NHS asset?” Well now is the time for politicians to put their support for the NHS to the test.

The perfect storm is not a cheap sound bite. Until or unless NHS staff are valued, respected and treated fairly, the storm clouds will loom large.

‘Poison doctor’ Erin struck off for abortion bid

BBC Health - 9:53 am

A doctor who was jailed for trying to poison his lover to induce a miscarriage has been struck off the medical register.

A GMC disciplinary panel found Edward Erin had “shown no remorse” and had not “gained insight into the gravity of his actions”.

Erin, of west London, was jailed for six years in 2009 for spiking Bella Prowse’s drinks after she became pregnant, but refused an abortion.

Prowse gave birth to a healthy boy. She was a secretary at St Mary’s Hospital in Paddington where Erin was a chest consultant.

His trial at the Old Bailey heard they were having an affair in 2008 which left her pregnant.

Erin gave Ms Prowse miscarriage-inducing drugs by grinding up tablets and spiking her coffee and then a bottle of orange juice. But she became suspicious and alerted the police.

Erin, a married father-of-two, was found guilty of two charges of attempting to administer poison.

Read more at BBC Health.

Reality bites - the candid views of THAT CEO

By Mike Broad - 8:30 am

The chief executive of University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Malcolm Lowe-Lauri, has sent a controversial email to his senior staff warning them of the consequences of tackling a £6m overspend.

The trust needs to make savings of £158m over the next five years due to government spending cuts.

The communication said: “The overshoot on our Income and Expenditure account lies somewhere between £5m and £6m. This can only be described as catastrophic.

“There’s a real issue about whether we will be able to pay our staff by August or September.”

In a bid to ensure the trust can pay its staff, health bosses have agreed to an immediate freeze on all but essential locum, bank and agency expenditure. There will also be a recruitment freeze on all but essential posts, and a new system of theatre management.

“That deals with the today issues. As for tomorrow, this is the bigger job,” he said.

“The divisional teams, led by the divisional directors and as part of the work to complete our five-year plan, will be bringing their teams together, especially their consultants, to take a long hard look at the way their services operate.

“Many of the questions I’ve had over the last few days have been about wages.

“Will staff be paid come September? Here’s my answer. Yes. We will put the brakes on and sort this, but only if we pull together and resolve some of the issues I’ve talked about.”

He concluded: “I’m writing this because I want no-one to be under the illusion about where we are.”

Was he right to be so candid?

BMA representatives reject revised NHS plans

BBC Health - 28th June 2011 7:10 pm

Doctors have rejected the government’s revised NHS plans, urging their union to take a tougher stance.

Delegates at the annual British Medical Association conference voted in favour of calling for the Health and Social Care Bill to be withdrawn by 59%.

The union initially welcomed concessions by ministers this month on competition and patient choice. But doctors at the Cardiff meeting said it was time to keep pushing the government “further and harder”.

The plans involve opening up the health service to greater competition and giving GPs a lead role in spending the NHS budget.

Amid mounting criticisms the government put the changes on hold in April. Two weeks ago ministers attempted to appease opponents by watering down certain aspects of the plans.

But delegates at the BMA said they were still not satisfied - despite pleas by BMA leader Dr Hamish Meldrum not to vote in favour of a series of critical motions.

One of those was calling for the bill underpinning the changes to be withdrawn. Meldrum said he would continue to ask for more.

Read more on BBC Health.

Guidance on duty to protect children from abuse

By Mike Broad - 7:05 pm

Doctors have a duty to protect children from abuse, new guidance from the GMC confirms.

Doctors who suspect children are being abused or neglected must tell parents and the young people themselves as soon as possible about their concerns and what action they will take.

The new guidance, developed by a working group chaired by Lord Justice Thorpe, seeks to set clear standards for all doctors, including those who do not routinely treat children. It says doctors have a duty to protect children even when they are only treating adults.

Every doctor should be able to spot signs that a child could be at risk at an early stage, for example if a parent misuses drugs or alcohol.

The group was set up following concerns by paediatricians and others involved in child protection about the difficulties of working in this area. These include knowing when to share confidential information and the risk of complaints being made by parents about the doctor’s decisions.

Evidence presented to the group from both doctors and parents suggested that open and early communication can help reduce the distress and confusion that parents and children often experience after concerns are raised.

Niall Dickson, chief executive of the GMC, said: “We recognise that taking action to protect children from abuse can be challenging and distressing for everyone involved. This is a complex area of practice, but we believe this new guidance will provide greater clarity about what doctors need to do to protect children, even if they are uncertain about the risks involved. We hope it will also help give doctors confidence to make these extremely difficult decisions.”

A foreword to the guidance reassures doctors that when they act reasonably in response to concerns about abuse or neglect, following the principles in this guidance, they will not be subject to censure by the GMC.

Key issues emerging during the development of the guidance included the importance of working closely and effectively with other professionals involved in child protection and the benefits of good and constructive communication with parents and carers. The guidance covers these and other areas including giving evidence in court, communicating with children and parents and sharing confidential information. 

Dr Amanda Thomas, officer for child protection at the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, said: “Spotting signs of child abuse and neglect is a complex and difficult field. This new guidance is fundamental for all medical staff to protect children and young people from harm.

“We have worked very closely with the GMC on this as the first duty of a paediatrician is to the child or young person. There is no doubt that these standards will help to keep children and young people safe and the consultation is a real chance to improve their medical care.”

Dr Nick Clements, head of medical services of MPS, added: “We have seen doctors concerned and potentially confused about when they should disclose information to other agencies, and how much information they should provide. The new GMC guidance is very helpful in this regard, and also provides further clarification about other important issues, such as where to store case conference records, and what information to provide to families about any investigation process.”

The GMC has also published analysis of the involvement of paediatricians in the GMC’s fitness to practise procedures which shows that paediatricians are no more likely than other doctors to have their cases referred to a public hearing.

Over a five year period, paediatricians received proportionately fewer complaints on average than other specialties including general practice and surgery. The analysis also indicates that complaints about paediatricians are more likely to be investigated, but are also more likely to be closed following an investigation with no further action than complaints about other doctors. This may be because paediatricians can be involved in contentious areas of practice that raise serious concerns, which may not always be borne out on investigation.

Since April 2006, the GMC has held 15 fitness-to-practise hearings involving paediatricians and only two were concerned with paediatricians involved in child protection.

The regulator controversially struck off both professors Southall and Meadow for their roles in fabricated and induced illness cases, before they were re-instated by the high court. Southall’s long-running case with the GMC is ongoing.

The consultation runs to 16 October 2011.

Time for presumed consent on organ donation

By Mike Broad - 2:42 pm

Doctors reaffirmed their support for the introduction of a system of presumed consent for organ donation at the BMA’s annual representatives meeting.

Under presumed consent, also known as an opt-out system, all people are assumed to be willing to donate their organs unless they have opted out. The BMA reaffirmed its support by defeating a motion which called for the reconsideration of its policy.

Those in favour believe it would help boost UK donation rates, which, despite recent improvements, still lag behind many other countries.

Over the last three years, the NHS has invested in specialist nurses and transplant co-ordinators to identify potential donors and allow for approaches to families when death becomes likely.

The BMA supports the introduction of a ‘soft’ system of presumed consent in which relatives’ views are also taken into account. Instead of being asked to consent to donation, they would be informed that their relative had not opted out of donation and unless they object - either because they are aware of an unregistered objection by the individual or because it would cause major distress to close relatives - the donation would proceed.

Donation would be the default position.

More than 3,700 donations took place last year - a 5% rise on the previous year - but there are still about 8,000 people on the waiting list.

Recent figures published by the Scottish government report that the number of Scots on the organ donor register is at an all time high, with 1.8million signed up to save a life. However, last year, there were only 67 organ donors in Scotland, while more than 600 people are still waiting for an organ.

Many more die before they even reach the waiting list.

Dr Sue Robertson, a renal physician and member of the BMA’s Scottish council, said: “Every year people die whilst waiting for a donor organ and evidence from other countries has shown that a system of presumed consent can address the shortage of donor organs and can save lives.

“It is important that an individual’s views on organ donation are taken into account following their death. Repeated surveys indicate that up to 90% of people are in favour of donating organs after their death, yet organ donation rates remain disappointingly low.

“Following the implementation of the recommendations of the organ donation taskforce in 2008, the NHS introduced a more robust system to support organ donation, but now is time for the government to take the next step. A system of presumed consent will create a system whereby the wishes of the individual can be taken into account and will increase the number of organs available for transplant.”

No part of the UK has introduced a system of presumed consent yet, although Wales has said it intends to.

BMA demands national list of “low priority” treatments

Pulse - 9:43 am

Doctors have demanded that the government produce a “consistent set of national standards” on low priority treatments to eradicate postcode lotteries in care.

Delegates at the BMA’s Annual Representative Meeting in Cardiff overwhelmingly backed a motion deploring the variable definitions and thresholds of low-priority treatments being implemented by PCOs, and said it was imperative that national standards were laid out to ensure patients had ‘equitable access to services’.

A separate motion, also carried, called upon the BMA to ‘ensure there are appropriate safeguards to prevent local variations in care leading to a “postcode lottery” and that patients are treated equitably’.

Read more at Pulse.